Cargando…
Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force
The shape of the cell nucleus can vary considerably during developmental and pathological processes; however, the impact of nuclear morphology on cell behavior is not known. Here, we observed that the nuclear envelope flattens as cells transit from G1 to S phase and inhibition of myosin II prevents...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31368207 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948084 |
_version_ | 1783449173173993472 |
---|---|
author | Aureille, Julien Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin Harvey, Ben E Boyault, Cyril Pernet, Lydia Andersen, Tomas Bacola, Gregory Balland, Martial Fraboulet, Sandrine Van Landeghem, Laurianne Guilluy, Christophe |
author_facet | Aureille, Julien Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin Harvey, Ben E Boyault, Cyril Pernet, Lydia Andersen, Tomas Bacola, Gregory Balland, Martial Fraboulet, Sandrine Van Landeghem, Laurianne Guilluy, Christophe |
author_sort | Aureille, Julien |
collection | PubMed |
description | The shape of the cell nucleus can vary considerably during developmental and pathological processes; however, the impact of nuclear morphology on cell behavior is not known. Here, we observed that the nuclear envelope flattens as cells transit from G1 to S phase and inhibition of myosin II prevents nuclear flattening and impedes progression to S phase. Strikingly, we show that applying compressive force on the nucleus in the absence of myosin II‐mediated tension is sufficient to restore G1 to S transition. Using a combination of tools to manipulate nuclear morphology, we observed that nuclear flattening activates a subset of transcription factors, including TEAD and AP1, leading to transcriptional induction of target genes that promote G1 to S transition. In addition, we found that nuclear flattening mediates TEAD and AP1 activation in response to ROCK‐generated contractility or cell spreading. Our results reveal that the nuclear envelope can operate as a mechanical sensor whose deformation controls cell growth in response to tension. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6726894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67268942019-09-10 Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force Aureille, Julien Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin Harvey, Ben E Boyault, Cyril Pernet, Lydia Andersen, Tomas Bacola, Gregory Balland, Martial Fraboulet, Sandrine Van Landeghem, Laurianne Guilluy, Christophe EMBO Rep Reports The shape of the cell nucleus can vary considerably during developmental and pathological processes; however, the impact of nuclear morphology on cell behavior is not known. Here, we observed that the nuclear envelope flattens as cells transit from G1 to S phase and inhibition of myosin II prevents nuclear flattening and impedes progression to S phase. Strikingly, we show that applying compressive force on the nucleus in the absence of myosin II‐mediated tension is sufficient to restore G1 to S transition. Using a combination of tools to manipulate nuclear morphology, we observed that nuclear flattening activates a subset of transcription factors, including TEAD and AP1, leading to transcriptional induction of target genes that promote G1 to S transition. In addition, we found that nuclear flattening mediates TEAD and AP1 activation in response to ROCK‐generated contractility or cell spreading. Our results reveal that the nuclear envelope can operate as a mechanical sensor whose deformation controls cell growth in response to tension. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-01 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6726894/ /pubmed/31368207 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948084 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reports Aureille, Julien Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin Harvey, Ben E Boyault, Cyril Pernet, Lydia Andersen, Tomas Bacola, Gregory Balland, Martial Fraboulet, Sandrine Van Landeghem, Laurianne Guilluy, Christophe Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force |
title | Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force |
title_full | Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force |
title_fullStr | Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force |
title_full_unstemmed | Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force |
title_short | Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force |
title_sort | nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force |
topic | Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31368207 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aureillejulien nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT buffiereribotvalentin nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT harveybene nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT boyaultcyril nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT pernetlydia nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT andersentomas nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT bacolagregory nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT ballandmartial nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT frabouletsandrine nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT vanlandeghemlaurianne nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce AT guilluychristophe nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce |