Cargando…

Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force

The shape of the cell nucleus can vary considerably during developmental and pathological processes; however, the impact of nuclear morphology on cell behavior is not known. Here, we observed that the nuclear envelope flattens as cells transit from G1 to S phase and inhibition of myosin II prevents...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aureille, Julien, Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin, Harvey, Ben E, Boyault, Cyril, Pernet, Lydia, Andersen, Tomas, Bacola, Gregory, Balland, Martial, Fraboulet, Sandrine, Van Landeghem, Laurianne, Guilluy, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31368207
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948084
_version_ 1783449173173993472
author Aureille, Julien
Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin
Harvey, Ben E
Boyault, Cyril
Pernet, Lydia
Andersen, Tomas
Bacola, Gregory
Balland, Martial
Fraboulet, Sandrine
Van Landeghem, Laurianne
Guilluy, Christophe
author_facet Aureille, Julien
Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin
Harvey, Ben E
Boyault, Cyril
Pernet, Lydia
Andersen, Tomas
Bacola, Gregory
Balland, Martial
Fraboulet, Sandrine
Van Landeghem, Laurianne
Guilluy, Christophe
author_sort Aureille, Julien
collection PubMed
description The shape of the cell nucleus can vary considerably during developmental and pathological processes; however, the impact of nuclear morphology on cell behavior is not known. Here, we observed that the nuclear envelope flattens as cells transit from G1 to S phase and inhibition of myosin II prevents nuclear flattening and impedes progression to S phase. Strikingly, we show that applying compressive force on the nucleus in the absence of myosin II‐mediated tension is sufficient to restore G1 to S transition. Using a combination of tools to manipulate nuclear morphology, we observed that nuclear flattening activates a subset of transcription factors, including TEAD and AP1, leading to transcriptional induction of target genes that promote G1 to S transition. In addition, we found that nuclear flattening mediates TEAD and AP1 activation in response to ROCK‐generated contractility or cell spreading. Our results reveal that the nuclear envelope can operate as a mechanical sensor whose deformation controls cell growth in response to tension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6726894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67268942019-09-10 Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force Aureille, Julien Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin Harvey, Ben E Boyault, Cyril Pernet, Lydia Andersen, Tomas Bacola, Gregory Balland, Martial Fraboulet, Sandrine Van Landeghem, Laurianne Guilluy, Christophe EMBO Rep Reports The shape of the cell nucleus can vary considerably during developmental and pathological processes; however, the impact of nuclear morphology on cell behavior is not known. Here, we observed that the nuclear envelope flattens as cells transit from G1 to S phase and inhibition of myosin II prevents nuclear flattening and impedes progression to S phase. Strikingly, we show that applying compressive force on the nucleus in the absence of myosin II‐mediated tension is sufficient to restore G1 to S transition. Using a combination of tools to manipulate nuclear morphology, we observed that nuclear flattening activates a subset of transcription factors, including TEAD and AP1, leading to transcriptional induction of target genes that promote G1 to S transition. In addition, we found that nuclear flattening mediates TEAD and AP1 activation in response to ROCK‐generated contractility or cell spreading. Our results reveal that the nuclear envelope can operate as a mechanical sensor whose deformation controls cell growth in response to tension. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-01 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6726894/ /pubmed/31368207 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948084 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reports
Aureille, Julien
Buffière‐Ribot, Valentin
Harvey, Ben E
Boyault, Cyril
Pernet, Lydia
Andersen, Tomas
Bacola, Gregory
Balland, Martial
Fraboulet, Sandrine
Van Landeghem, Laurianne
Guilluy, Christophe
Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force
title Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force
title_full Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force
title_fullStr Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force
title_full_unstemmed Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force
title_short Nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force
title_sort nuclear envelope deformation controls cell cycle progression in response to mechanical force
topic Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31368207
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948084
work_keys_str_mv AT aureillejulien nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT buffiereribotvalentin nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT harveybene nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT boyaultcyril nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT pernetlydia nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT andersentomas nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT bacolagregory nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT ballandmartial nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT frabouletsandrine nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT vanlandeghemlaurianne nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce
AT guilluychristophe nuclearenvelopedeformationcontrolscellcycleprogressioninresponsetomechanicalforce