Cargando…

Ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the INSIGHT trial

BACKGROUND: Use of food to soothe infant distress has been linked to greater weight in observational studies. We used ecological momentary assessment to capture detailed patterns of food to soothe and evaluate if a responsive parenting intervention reduced parents’ use of food to soothe. METHODS: Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adams, Elizabeth L., Marini, Michele E., Brick, Timothy R., Paul, Ian M., Birch, Leann L., Savage, Jennifer S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0837-y
_version_ 1783449245148250112
author Adams, Elizabeth L.
Marini, Michele E.
Brick, Timothy R.
Paul, Ian M.
Birch, Leann L.
Savage, Jennifer S.
author_facet Adams, Elizabeth L.
Marini, Michele E.
Brick, Timothy R.
Paul, Ian M.
Birch, Leann L.
Savage, Jennifer S.
author_sort Adams, Elizabeth L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Use of food to soothe infant distress has been linked to greater weight in observational studies. We used ecological momentary assessment to capture detailed patterns of food to soothe and evaluate if a responsive parenting intervention reduced parents’ use of food to soothe. METHODS: Primiparous mother-newborn dyads were randomized to a responsive parenting intervention designed for obesity prevention or a safety control group. Responsive parenting curriculum included guidance on using alternative soothing strategies (e.g., swaddling), rather than feeding, as the first response to infant fussiness. After the initial intervention visit 3 weeks after delivery, mothers (n = 157) were surveyed for two 5–8 day bursts at infant ages 3 and 8 weeks. Surveys were sent via text message every 4 h between 10:00 AM-10:00 PM, with 2 surveys sent at 8:00 AM asking about nighttime hours. Infant fusses and feeds were reported for each 4-h interval. Food to soothe was defined as “Fed First” and “Not Fed First” in response to a fussy event. Use of food to soothe was modeled using random-intercept logistic regression. RESULTS: The control group had greater odds of having Fed First, compared to the responsive parenting group at ages 3 and 8 weeks (3 weeks: OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.4–2.7; p < 0.01; 8 weeks: OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.0–2.1; p = 0.053). More responsive parenting mothers reported using a responsive parenting intervention strategy first, before feeding, than controls at ages 3 and 8 weeks (3 weeks: 58.1% vs. 41.9%; 8 weeks: 57.1% vs. 42.9%, respectively; p < 0.01 for both). At both ages combined, fewer fusses from responsive parenting infants were soothed best by feeding compared to controls (49.5% vs. 61.0%, respectively; p < 0.01). For both study groups combined, parents had greater odds of having Fed First during the nighttime compared to the daytime at both ages (3 weeks: OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.4–1.8; p < 0.01; 8 weeks: OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.7–2.6; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: INSIGHT’s responsive parenting intervention reduced use of food to soothe and increased use of alternative soothing strategies in response to infant fussiness. Education on responsive parenting behaviors around fussing and feeding during early infancy has the potential to improve later self-regulation and weight gain trajectory. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01167270. Registered July 21, 2010.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6727410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67274102019-09-10 Ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the INSIGHT trial Adams, Elizabeth L. Marini, Michele E. Brick, Timothy R. Paul, Ian M. Birch, Leann L. Savage, Jennifer S. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Use of food to soothe infant distress has been linked to greater weight in observational studies. We used ecological momentary assessment to capture detailed patterns of food to soothe and evaluate if a responsive parenting intervention reduced parents’ use of food to soothe. METHODS: Primiparous mother-newborn dyads were randomized to a responsive parenting intervention designed for obesity prevention or a safety control group. Responsive parenting curriculum included guidance on using alternative soothing strategies (e.g., swaddling), rather than feeding, as the first response to infant fussiness. After the initial intervention visit 3 weeks after delivery, mothers (n = 157) were surveyed for two 5–8 day bursts at infant ages 3 and 8 weeks. Surveys were sent via text message every 4 h between 10:00 AM-10:00 PM, with 2 surveys sent at 8:00 AM asking about nighttime hours. Infant fusses and feeds were reported for each 4-h interval. Food to soothe was defined as “Fed First” and “Not Fed First” in response to a fussy event. Use of food to soothe was modeled using random-intercept logistic regression. RESULTS: The control group had greater odds of having Fed First, compared to the responsive parenting group at ages 3 and 8 weeks (3 weeks: OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.4–2.7; p < 0.01; 8 weeks: OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.0–2.1; p = 0.053). More responsive parenting mothers reported using a responsive parenting intervention strategy first, before feeding, than controls at ages 3 and 8 weeks (3 weeks: 58.1% vs. 41.9%; 8 weeks: 57.1% vs. 42.9%, respectively; p < 0.01 for both). At both ages combined, fewer fusses from responsive parenting infants were soothed best by feeding compared to controls (49.5% vs. 61.0%, respectively; p < 0.01). For both study groups combined, parents had greater odds of having Fed First during the nighttime compared to the daytime at both ages (3 weeks: OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.4–1.8; p < 0.01; 8 weeks: OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.7–2.6; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: INSIGHT’s responsive parenting intervention reduced use of food to soothe and increased use of alternative soothing strategies in response to infant fussiness. Education on responsive parenting behaviors around fussing and feeding during early infancy has the potential to improve later self-regulation and weight gain trajectory. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01167270. Registered July 21, 2010. BioMed Central 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6727410/ /pubmed/31488156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0837-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Adams, Elizabeth L.
Marini, Michele E.
Brick, Timothy R.
Paul, Ian M.
Birch, Leann L.
Savage, Jennifer S.
Ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the INSIGHT trial
title Ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the INSIGHT trial
title_full Ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the INSIGHT trial
title_fullStr Ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the INSIGHT trial
title_full_unstemmed Ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the INSIGHT trial
title_short Ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the INSIGHT trial
title_sort ecological momentary assessment of using food to soothe during infancy in the insight trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0837-y
work_keys_str_mv AT adamselizabethl ecologicalmomentaryassessmentofusingfoodtosootheduringinfancyintheinsighttrial
AT marinimichelee ecologicalmomentaryassessmentofusingfoodtosootheduringinfancyintheinsighttrial
AT bricktimothyr ecologicalmomentaryassessmentofusingfoodtosootheduringinfancyintheinsighttrial
AT paulianm ecologicalmomentaryassessmentofusingfoodtosootheduringinfancyintheinsighttrial
AT birchleannl ecologicalmomentaryassessmentofusingfoodtosootheduringinfancyintheinsighttrial
AT savagejennifers ecologicalmomentaryassessmentofusingfoodtosootheduringinfancyintheinsighttrial