Cargando…

Estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Women with cardiac disease are thought to be at increased risk of post-partum haemorrhage. We sought to assess the estimated blood loss (EBL) in our cohort of women with and without cardiac disease (CD) in a quaternary hospital in the UK. Our population consisted of both congenital and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chong, Hsu Phern, Hodson, James, Selman, Tara J., Hudsmith, Lucy E., Thompson, Peter J., Morris, Rachel Katherine, Thorne, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31484509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2447-8
_version_ 1783449260308561920
author Chong, Hsu Phern
Hodson, James
Selman, Tara J.
Hudsmith, Lucy E.
Thompson, Peter J.
Morris, Rachel Katherine
Thorne, Sara
author_facet Chong, Hsu Phern
Hodson, James
Selman, Tara J.
Hudsmith, Lucy E.
Thompson, Peter J.
Morris, Rachel Katherine
Thorne, Sara
author_sort Chong, Hsu Phern
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women with cardiac disease are thought to be at increased risk of post-partum haemorrhage. We sought to assess the estimated blood loss (EBL) in our cohort of women with and without cardiac disease (CD) in a quaternary hospital in the UK. Our population consisted of both congenital and acquired CD; and low risk women who delivered in our unit between 01/01/2012–30/09/2016. METHODS: Data were collected using computerised hospital records. CD was classified according to the modified WHO classification (mWHO). The primary outcome measure was estimated blood loss (mL). RESULTS: A total of 5413 women with a singleton fetus in the cephalic presentation delivered during the study period (159 women with CD and 5254 controls). In the CD group, active management of the third stage of labour was consistent with that used in low risk women in 98% (152/155) of cases. Multivariable analyses demonstrated no significant difference in EBL between women with CD vs controls. The adjusted average blood losses were 247.2 ml, 241.8 ml and 295.9 ml in the control group, mWHO 1–2 and 3–4, respectively (p = 0.165). CONCLUSIONS: Women with CD have comparable EBL to low risk women when management of the active third stage of labour is the same.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6727489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67274892019-09-12 Estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study Chong, Hsu Phern Hodson, James Selman, Tara J. Hudsmith, Lucy E. Thompson, Peter J. Morris, Rachel Katherine Thorne, Sara BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Women with cardiac disease are thought to be at increased risk of post-partum haemorrhage. We sought to assess the estimated blood loss (EBL) in our cohort of women with and without cardiac disease (CD) in a quaternary hospital in the UK. Our population consisted of both congenital and acquired CD; and low risk women who delivered in our unit between 01/01/2012–30/09/2016. METHODS: Data were collected using computerised hospital records. CD was classified according to the modified WHO classification (mWHO). The primary outcome measure was estimated blood loss (mL). RESULTS: A total of 5413 women with a singleton fetus in the cephalic presentation delivered during the study period (159 women with CD and 5254 controls). In the CD group, active management of the third stage of labour was consistent with that used in low risk women in 98% (152/155) of cases. Multivariable analyses demonstrated no significant difference in EBL between women with CD vs controls. The adjusted average blood losses were 247.2 ml, 241.8 ml and 295.9 ml in the control group, mWHO 1–2 and 3–4, respectively (p = 0.165). CONCLUSIONS: Women with CD have comparable EBL to low risk women when management of the active third stage of labour is the same. BioMed Central 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6727489/ /pubmed/31484509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2447-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chong, Hsu Phern
Hodson, James
Selman, Tara J.
Hudsmith, Lucy E.
Thompson, Peter J.
Morris, Rachel Katherine
Thorne, Sara
Estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study
title Estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study
title_full Estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study
title_short Estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study
title_sort estimated blood loss in pregnant women with cardiac disease compared with low risk women: a restrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31484509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2447-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chonghsuphern estimatedbloodlossinpregnantwomenwithcardiacdiseasecomparedwithlowriskwomenarestrospectivecohortstudy
AT hodsonjames estimatedbloodlossinpregnantwomenwithcardiacdiseasecomparedwithlowriskwomenarestrospectivecohortstudy
AT selmantaraj estimatedbloodlossinpregnantwomenwithcardiacdiseasecomparedwithlowriskwomenarestrospectivecohortstudy
AT hudsmithlucye estimatedbloodlossinpregnantwomenwithcardiacdiseasecomparedwithlowriskwomenarestrospectivecohortstudy
AT thompsonpeterj estimatedbloodlossinpregnantwomenwithcardiacdiseasecomparedwithlowriskwomenarestrospectivecohortstudy
AT morrisrachelkatherine estimatedbloodlossinpregnantwomenwithcardiacdiseasecomparedwithlowriskwomenarestrospectivecohortstudy
AT thornesara estimatedbloodlossinpregnantwomenwithcardiacdiseasecomparedwithlowriskwomenarestrospectivecohortstudy