Cargando…

Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument

BACKGROUND: At the crux of patient centred care is Shared Decision Making (SDM), which benefits patient and practitioner. Despite external pressures, studies indicate that SDM remains poorly practised across a variety of healthcare professions. The degree of SDM engagement within United Kingdom oste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajendran, Dévan, Beazley, Jane, Bright, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0260-0
_version_ 1783449270122184704
author Rajendran, Dévan
Beazley, Jane
Bright, Philip
author_facet Rajendran, Dévan
Beazley, Jane
Bright, Philip
author_sort Rajendran, Dévan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: At the crux of patient centred care is Shared Decision Making (SDM), which benefits patient and practitioner. Despite external pressures, studies indicate that SDM remains poorly practised across a variety of healthcare professions. The degree of SDM engagement within United Kingdom osteopathic undergraduate teaching clinics is currently unknown. METHODS: In 2014 we used the reliable and validated OPTION-12 (O12) instrument to calculate a score that reflected the degree of SDM utility in one United Kingdom Osteopathic Educational Institute’s teaching clinic. We also aimed to compare these scores with those previously obtained for physiotherapists working within the United Kingdom’s National Health Service. Student-patient initial and follow-up encounters were audio recorded, transcribed and scored using the O12. Comparisons between the following O12 scores were performed: the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s 4th and 3rd year students; the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s student’s initial and follow-up patient encounters; the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s students and National Health Service physiotherapists. RESULTS: We analysed 35.5 h of transcribed data from 30 student-patient encounters (7 initial: 23 follow-up). An O12 score of 0.6% (range 0–10.4%) was calculated. No significant differences were found between year groups or encounter types. Significant differences were found compared to National Health Service physiotherapist (score = 24.4%): (U = 144, z = 4.25, p < 0.0005); although both scores are below the 60% threshold for competent SDM behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Undergraduate osteopaths did not appear to engage in competent SDM behaviours, implying traditional and paternalistic styles of decision making that align with results from other manual therapy professions. Students in this study did not practise competent SDM behaviours. Effective educational strategies are required to ensure SDM behaviours reach competent levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6727529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67275292019-09-12 Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument Rajendran, Dévan Beazley, Jane Bright, Philip Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: At the crux of patient centred care is Shared Decision Making (SDM), which benefits patient and practitioner. Despite external pressures, studies indicate that SDM remains poorly practised across a variety of healthcare professions. The degree of SDM engagement within United Kingdom osteopathic undergraduate teaching clinics is currently unknown. METHODS: In 2014 we used the reliable and validated OPTION-12 (O12) instrument to calculate a score that reflected the degree of SDM utility in one United Kingdom Osteopathic Educational Institute’s teaching clinic. We also aimed to compare these scores with those previously obtained for physiotherapists working within the United Kingdom’s National Health Service. Student-patient initial and follow-up encounters were audio recorded, transcribed and scored using the O12. Comparisons between the following O12 scores were performed: the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s 4th and 3rd year students; the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s student’s initial and follow-up patient encounters; the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s students and National Health Service physiotherapists. RESULTS: We analysed 35.5 h of transcribed data from 30 student-patient encounters (7 initial: 23 follow-up). An O12 score of 0.6% (range 0–10.4%) was calculated. No significant differences were found between year groups or encounter types. Significant differences were found compared to National Health Service physiotherapist (score = 24.4%): (U = 144, z = 4.25, p < 0.0005); although both scores are below the 60% threshold for competent SDM behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Undergraduate osteopaths did not appear to engage in competent SDM behaviours, implying traditional and paternalistic styles of decision making that align with results from other manual therapy professions. Students in this study did not practise competent SDM behaviours. Effective educational strategies are required to ensure SDM behaviours reach competent levels. BioMed Central 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6727529/ /pubmed/31516693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0260-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rajendran, Dévan
Beazley, Jane
Bright, Philip
Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument
title Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument
title_full Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument
title_fullStr Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument
title_short Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument
title_sort shared decision making by united kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the option-12 instrument
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0260-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rajendrandevan shareddecisionmakingbyunitedkingdomosteopathicstudentsanobservationalstudyusingtheoption12instrument
AT beazleyjane shareddecisionmakingbyunitedkingdomosteopathicstudentsanobservationalstudyusingtheoption12instrument
AT brightphilip shareddecisionmakingbyunitedkingdomosteopathicstudentsanobservationalstudyusingtheoption12instrument