Cargando…

Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND: The literature abounds with increasing numbers of research studies using genomic data in combination with health data (eg, health records and phenotypic and lifestyle data), with great potential for large-scale research and precision medicine. However, concerns have been raised about soc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Kerina H, Daniels, Helen, Squires, Emma, Ford, David V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31436163
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14384
_version_ 1783449302527377408
author Jones, Kerina H
Daniels, Helen
Squires, Emma
Ford, David V
author_facet Jones, Kerina H
Daniels, Helen
Squires, Emma
Ford, David V
author_sort Jones, Kerina H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The literature abounds with increasing numbers of research studies using genomic data in combination with health data (eg, health records and phenotypic and lifestyle data), with great potential for large-scale research and precision medicine. However, concerns have been raised about social acceptability and risks posed for individuals and their kin. Although there has been public engagement on various aspects of this topic, there is a lack of information about public views on data access models. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to address the lack of information on the social acceptability of access models for reusing genomic data collected for research in conjunction with health data. Models considered were open web-based access, released externally to researchers, and access within a data safe haven. METHODS: Views were ascertained using a series of 8 public workshops (N=116). The workshops included an explanation of benefits and risks in using genomic data with health data, a facilitated discussion, and an exit questionnaire. The resulting quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and the qualitative data were analyzed for emerging themes. RESULTS: Respondents placed a high value on the reuse of genomic data but raised concerns including data misuse, information governance, and discrimination. They showed a preference for giving consent and use of data within a safe haven over external release or open access. Perceived risks with open access included data being used by unscrupulous parties, with external release included data security, and with safe havens included the need for robust safeguards. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known study exploring public views of access models for reusing anonymized genomic and health data in research. It indicated that people are generally amenable but prefer data safe havens because of perceived sensitivities. We recommend that public views be incorporated into guidance on models for the reuse of genomic and health data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6727690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67276902019-09-19 Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study Jones, Kerina H Daniels, Helen Squires, Emma Ford, David V J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The literature abounds with increasing numbers of research studies using genomic data in combination with health data (eg, health records and phenotypic and lifestyle data), with great potential for large-scale research and precision medicine. However, concerns have been raised about social acceptability and risks posed for individuals and their kin. Although there has been public engagement on various aspects of this topic, there is a lack of information about public views on data access models. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to address the lack of information on the social acceptability of access models for reusing genomic data collected for research in conjunction with health data. Models considered were open web-based access, released externally to researchers, and access within a data safe haven. METHODS: Views were ascertained using a series of 8 public workshops (N=116). The workshops included an explanation of benefits and risks in using genomic data with health data, a facilitated discussion, and an exit questionnaire. The resulting quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and the qualitative data were analyzed for emerging themes. RESULTS: Respondents placed a high value on the reuse of genomic data but raised concerns including data misuse, information governance, and discrimination. They showed a preference for giving consent and use of data within a safe haven over external release or open access. Perceived risks with open access included data being used by unscrupulous parties, with external release included data security, and with safe havens included the need for robust safeguards. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known study exploring public views of access models for reusing anonymized genomic and health data in research. It indicated that people are generally amenable but prefer data safe havens because of perceived sensitivities. We recommend that public views be incorporated into guidance on models for the reuse of genomic and health data. JMIR Publications 2019-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6727690/ /pubmed/31436163 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14384 Text en ©Kerina H Jones, Helen Daniels, Emma Squires, David V Ford. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.08.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jones, Kerina H
Daniels, Helen
Squires, Emma
Ford, David V
Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study
title Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study
title_full Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study
title_short Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study
title_sort public views on models for accessing genomic and health data for research: mixed methods study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31436163
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14384
work_keys_str_mv AT joneskerinah publicviewsonmodelsforaccessinggenomicandhealthdataforresearchmixedmethodsstudy
AT danielshelen publicviewsonmodelsforaccessinggenomicandhealthdataforresearchmixedmethodsstudy
AT squiresemma publicviewsonmodelsforaccessinggenomicandhealthdataforresearchmixedmethodsstudy
AT forddavidv publicviewsonmodelsforaccessinggenomicandhealthdataforresearchmixedmethodsstudy