Cargando…

Gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: Comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations

PURPOSE: Compare the agreement between the finally fitted back optic zone radius (BOZR) of a spherical gas permeable (GP) contact lense (CL) with those proposed by different guidelines currently available to fit GP CLs in keratoconus. METHODS: The BOZR fitted in 81 keratoconus eyes (46 patients) wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortiz-Toquero, Sara, Rodriguez, Guadalupe, de Juan, Victoria, Martin, Raul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31436183
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1538_18
_version_ 1783449311516819456
author Ortiz-Toquero, Sara
Rodriguez, Guadalupe
de Juan, Victoria
Martin, Raul
author_facet Ortiz-Toquero, Sara
Rodriguez, Guadalupe
de Juan, Victoria
Martin, Raul
author_sort Ortiz-Toquero, Sara
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Compare the agreement between the finally fitted back optic zone radius (BOZR) of a spherical gas permeable (GP) contact lense (CL) with those proposed by different guidelines currently available to fit GP CLs in keratoconus. METHODS: The BOZR fitted in 81 keratoconus eyes (46 patients) were recorded and compared with the BOZR calculated with ten different guidelines (identified after a literature review) proposed to calculate the first diagnostic lens BOZR to be fitted in keratoconus. Arithmetic and absolute mean difference between both BOZR were calculated (paired t-test). The success rate of each guideline (difference between both BOZR ≤0.05 mm) was calculated for different keratoconus stages (Amsler–Krumeich classification). Agreement between BOZR was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The BOZR proposed by all guidelines correlated with the final BOZR that was fitted (R(2) > 0.71; P < 0.01). A statistically significant difference was found between the BOZR suggested by all guidelines and the BOZR that was prescribed (P < 0.05), except for three Guidelines (P ≥ 0.11). CALCULENS.com presented the best agreement (mean difference of 0.00 ± 0.12 mm), and 50.6% of cases showed ≤0.05 mm of difference with the BOZR that was fitted. However, the worst guideline showed an agreement of −0.38 ± 0.22 mm, and just 3.8% of cases had ≤0.05 mm of difference with the final fitted BOZR. CONCLUSION: BOZR calculated with most of the analyzed guidelines shows statistical differences with final fitted BOZR, suggesting a lack of clinical validation of these guidelines. The selection of the BOZR with CALCULENS.com could provide a better starting point for spherical GP CL fitting in keratoconus eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6727727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67277272019-09-19 Gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: Comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations Ortiz-Toquero, Sara Rodriguez, Guadalupe de Juan, Victoria Martin, Raul Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: Compare the agreement between the finally fitted back optic zone radius (BOZR) of a spherical gas permeable (GP) contact lense (CL) with those proposed by different guidelines currently available to fit GP CLs in keratoconus. METHODS: The BOZR fitted in 81 keratoconus eyes (46 patients) were recorded and compared with the BOZR calculated with ten different guidelines (identified after a literature review) proposed to calculate the first diagnostic lens BOZR to be fitted in keratoconus. Arithmetic and absolute mean difference between both BOZR were calculated (paired t-test). The success rate of each guideline (difference between both BOZR ≤0.05 mm) was calculated for different keratoconus stages (Amsler–Krumeich classification). Agreement between BOZR was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The BOZR proposed by all guidelines correlated with the final BOZR that was fitted (R(2) > 0.71; P < 0.01). A statistically significant difference was found between the BOZR suggested by all guidelines and the BOZR that was prescribed (P < 0.05), except for three Guidelines (P ≥ 0.11). CALCULENS.com presented the best agreement (mean difference of 0.00 ± 0.12 mm), and 50.6% of cases showed ≤0.05 mm of difference with the BOZR that was fitted. However, the worst guideline showed an agreement of −0.38 ± 0.22 mm, and just 3.8% of cases had ≤0.05 mm of difference with the final fitted BOZR. CONCLUSION: BOZR calculated with most of the analyzed guidelines shows statistical differences with final fitted BOZR, suggesting a lack of clinical validation of these guidelines. The selection of the BOZR with CALCULENS.com could provide a better starting point for spherical GP CL fitting in keratoconus eyes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6727727/ /pubmed/31436183 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1538_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ortiz-Toquero, Sara
Rodriguez, Guadalupe
de Juan, Victoria
Martin, Raul
Gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: Comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations
title Gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: Comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations
title_full Gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: Comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations
title_fullStr Gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: Comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations
title_full_unstemmed Gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: Comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations
title_short Gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: Comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations
title_sort gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus: comparison of different guidelines to back optic zone radius calculations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31436183
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1538_18
work_keys_str_mv AT ortiztoquerosara gaspermeablecontactlensfittinginkeratoconuscomparisonofdifferentguidelinestobackopticzoneradiuscalculations
AT rodriguezguadalupe gaspermeablecontactlensfittinginkeratoconuscomparisonofdifferentguidelinestobackopticzoneradiuscalculations
AT dejuanvictoria gaspermeablecontactlensfittinginkeratoconuscomparisonofdifferentguidelinestobackopticzoneradiuscalculations
AT martinraul gaspermeablecontactlensfittinginkeratoconuscomparisonofdifferentguidelinestobackopticzoneradiuscalculations