Cargando…

Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements—Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the intraobserver repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by 2 commonly available instruments, Zeiss IOL Master 700 (SS-OCT-based optical biometry device) and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 (Noncontact specu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, James Yuheng, Ong, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000243
_version_ 1783449347385458688
author Jiang, James Yuheng
Ong, Keith
author_facet Jiang, James Yuheng
Ong, Keith
author_sort Jiang, James Yuheng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the intraobserver repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by 2 commonly available instruments, Zeiss IOL Master 700 (SS-OCT-based optical biometry device) and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 (Noncontact specular microscopy). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of data from routine clinical practice in which preoperative CCT measurements of 105 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed. Two consecutive CCT measurements were measured using Zeiss IOL Master 700 and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 by the same examiner. The repeatability of CCT measurements was analyzed by mean intraobserver difference, coefficient of repeatability (CR), and intraclass correlation. The agreement between the 2 methods was analyzed by mean difference and limits of agreement (LoA) using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The mean absolute intraobserver difference between the 2 measurements by Zeiss and Tomey were 3.41 ± 3.98 μm and 8.62 ± 9.52 μm (P < 0.0001), respectively. For Zeiss, the CR was 10.3 μm with 95% LoA of −10.5 to 10.1 μm. For Tomey, the CR was 25.2 μm with 95% LoA of −25.2 to 25.2 μm. The mean CCT measurements ± standard deviation by Zeiss and Tomey were 544.0 ± 38.1 μm and 532.6 ± 40.0 μm, respectively (P = 0.003). The 95% LoA in CCT between the 2 methods was −15.8 to 38.7 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Zeiss IOL Master 700 has superior intraobserver repeatability and consistency than Tomey EM-3000. Zeiss produced higher CCT measurements than Tomey; hence, in clinical practice, interchangeability between these 2 methods is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6727924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67279242019-10-02 Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements—Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope Jiang, James Yuheng Ong, Keith Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) Original Clinical Study PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the intraobserver repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by 2 commonly available instruments, Zeiss IOL Master 700 (SS-OCT-based optical biometry device) and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 (Noncontact specular microscopy). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of data from routine clinical practice in which preoperative CCT measurements of 105 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed. Two consecutive CCT measurements were measured using Zeiss IOL Master 700 and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 by the same examiner. The repeatability of CCT measurements was analyzed by mean intraobserver difference, coefficient of repeatability (CR), and intraclass correlation. The agreement between the 2 methods was analyzed by mean difference and limits of agreement (LoA) using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The mean absolute intraobserver difference between the 2 measurements by Zeiss and Tomey were 3.41 ± 3.98 μm and 8.62 ± 9.52 μm (P < 0.0001), respectively. For Zeiss, the CR was 10.3 μm with 95% LoA of −10.5 to 10.1 μm. For Tomey, the CR was 25.2 μm with 95% LoA of −25.2 to 25.2 μm. The mean CCT measurements ± standard deviation by Zeiss and Tomey were 544.0 ± 38.1 μm and 532.6 ± 40.0 μm, respectively (P = 0.003). The 95% LoA in CCT between the 2 methods was −15.8 to 38.7 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Zeiss IOL Master 700 has superior intraobserver repeatability and consistency than Tomey EM-3000. Zeiss produced higher CCT measurements than Tomey; hence, in clinical practice, interchangeability between these 2 methods is limited. Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6727924/ /pubmed/31356366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000243 Text en Copyright © 2019 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Original Clinical Study
Jiang, James Yuheng
Ong, Keith
Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements—Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope
title Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements—Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope
title_full Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements—Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope
title_fullStr Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements—Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope
title_full_unstemmed Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements—Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope
title_short Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements—Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope
title_sort variability of central corneal thickness measurements—comparing zeiss iol master and tomey corneal specular microscope
topic Original Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000243
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangjamesyuheng variabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementscomparingzeissiolmasterandtomeycornealspecularmicroscope
AT ongkeith variabilityofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementscomparingzeissiolmasterandtomeycornealspecularmicroscope