Cargando…

Performance of a New-Generation Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens—A Prospective Comparative Study

PURPOSE: The aim was to study the visual performance of a new refractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study. METHODS: Consenting patients with age-related cataract willing for bilateral cataract surgery within 2 weeks were implanted with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nivean, Madhivanan, Nivean, Pratheeba Devi, Reddy, Jagadeesh Kumar, Ramamoorthy, Kavithaa, Madhivanan, Nishanth, Rajan, Mohan, Sengupta, Sabyasachi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31397676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000245
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim was to study the visual performance of a new refractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study. METHODS: Consenting patients with age-related cataract willing for bilateral cataract surgery within 2 weeks were implanted with the Supraphob EDOF IOL and those willing for 1 eye surgery were implanted with a monofocal IOL. The uncorrected and best-corrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity were evaluated at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. We also inquired about glare, halos, difficulties in night driving, requirement for spectacles, and overall satisfaction with vision. RESULTS: The Supraphob EDOF group (n = 72 eyes) and the monofocal IOL group (n = 54 eyes) were comparable with respect to all preoperative parameters including biometry, visual acuity, and cataract status. The mean age of participants was 58.4 ± 10.6 years. Both groups had similar distance vision but the EDOF group had significantly better intermediate (0.2 ± 0.2 logMAR vs 0.75 ± 0.19 logMAR, P < 0.001) and near vision (median = N6 vs N12, P < 0.001) compared to the monofocal group at 3 months. The contrast sensitivity was similar in both groups. Patients in the EDOF IOL group had much greater satisfaction for intermediate and near vision. Less than 10% patients reported glare, halos, and difficulty in driving at night in the EDOF group. CONCLUSIONS: The Supraphob EDOF IOL was effective in improving the distance, intermediate and near vision in majority of patients, and retained good contrast sensitivity with most patients reporting excellent satisfaction.