Cargando…

Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based New Users High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohorts Study

We compared the 1-year safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban 15 mg (R15) or rivaroxaban 20 mg (R20) to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS—: New user cohort study of patients dispensed R15 or R20 versus VKA in 2013 or 2014 for nonvalvular atrial f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blin, Patrick, Fauchier, Laurent, Dureau-Pournin, Caroline, Sacher, Frédéric, Dallongeville, Jean, Bernard, Marie-Agnès, Lassalle, Regis, Droz-Perroteau, Cécile, Moore, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025824
_version_ 1783449347868852224
author Blin, Patrick
Fauchier, Laurent
Dureau-Pournin, Caroline
Sacher, Frédéric
Dallongeville, Jean
Bernard, Marie-Agnès
Lassalle, Regis
Droz-Perroteau, Cécile
Moore, Nicholas
author_facet Blin, Patrick
Fauchier, Laurent
Dureau-Pournin, Caroline
Sacher, Frédéric
Dallongeville, Jean
Bernard, Marie-Agnès
Lassalle, Regis
Droz-Perroteau, Cécile
Moore, Nicholas
author_sort Blin, Patrick
collection PubMed
description We compared the 1-year safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban 15 mg (R15) or rivaroxaban 20 mg (R20) to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS—: New user cohort study of patients dispensed R15 or R20 versus VKA in 2013 or 2014 for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, followed 1 year in the French Système National des Données de Santé (66 million people). R15 and R20 users were matched 1:1 with VKA users on sex, age, date of first drug dispensing, and high-dimensional propensity score. Hazard ratios (95% CIs) for stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death were computed using Cox proportional hazards or models by Fine and Gray during exposure. RESULTS—: In 31 171 matched R20 and VKA, mean age, 71; 62% men; 76% with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc ≥2; 5% HAS-BLED >3 (hypertension, abnormal renal and liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile INR, elderly, drugs or alcohol); incidence rates for stroke and systemic embolism were 1.5% and 1.9% (hazard ratio, 0.79 [0.69–0.90]); major bleeding, 1.5% and 2.2% (0.67 [0.59–0.77]); death, 3.9% and 5.8% (0.67 [0.61–0.73]). In 23 314 matched R15 and VKA patients, mean age, 80; 47% men; 93% with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc ≥2 and 9% with HAS-BLED >3; incidence rates of stroke and systemic embolism were 2.3% and 2.1% (1.05 [0.92–1.21]); major bleeding, 2.4% and 2.9% (0.84 [0.74–0.96]); death, 9.1% and 10.8% (0.85 [0.79–0.90]). Numbers needed to treat to observe one fewer death (NNT) were 46 for R15 and 61 for R20. CONCLUSIONS—: In real life in France over 2013 to 2015, R15 and R20 were at least as effective and safer than VKA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.encepp.eu. Unique identifier: EUPAS14567.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6727926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67279262019-10-02 Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based New Users High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohorts Study Blin, Patrick Fauchier, Laurent Dureau-Pournin, Caroline Sacher, Frédéric Dallongeville, Jean Bernard, Marie-Agnès Lassalle, Regis Droz-Perroteau, Cécile Moore, Nicholas Stroke Original Contributions We compared the 1-year safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban 15 mg (R15) or rivaroxaban 20 mg (R20) to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS—: New user cohort study of patients dispensed R15 or R20 versus VKA in 2013 or 2014 for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, followed 1 year in the French Système National des Données de Santé (66 million people). R15 and R20 users were matched 1:1 with VKA users on sex, age, date of first drug dispensing, and high-dimensional propensity score. Hazard ratios (95% CIs) for stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death were computed using Cox proportional hazards or models by Fine and Gray during exposure. RESULTS—: In 31 171 matched R20 and VKA, mean age, 71; 62% men; 76% with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc ≥2; 5% HAS-BLED >3 (hypertension, abnormal renal and liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile INR, elderly, drugs or alcohol); incidence rates for stroke and systemic embolism were 1.5% and 1.9% (hazard ratio, 0.79 [0.69–0.90]); major bleeding, 1.5% and 2.2% (0.67 [0.59–0.77]); death, 3.9% and 5.8% (0.67 [0.61–0.73]). In 23 314 matched R15 and VKA patients, mean age, 80; 47% men; 93% with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc ≥2 and 9% with HAS-BLED >3; incidence rates of stroke and systemic embolism were 2.3% and 2.1% (1.05 [0.92–1.21]); major bleeding, 2.4% and 2.9% (0.84 [0.74–0.96]); death, 9.1% and 10.8% (0.85 [0.79–0.90]). Numbers needed to treat to observe one fewer death (NNT) were 46 for R15 and 61 for R20. CONCLUSIONS—: In real life in France over 2013 to 2015, R15 and R20 were at least as effective and safer than VKA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.encepp.eu. Unique identifier: EUPAS14567. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-09 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6727926/ /pubmed/31390972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025824 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Blin, Patrick
Fauchier, Laurent
Dureau-Pournin, Caroline
Sacher, Frédéric
Dallongeville, Jean
Bernard, Marie-Agnès
Lassalle, Regis
Droz-Perroteau, Cécile
Moore, Nicholas
Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based New Users High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohorts Study
title Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based New Users High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohorts Study
title_full Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based New Users High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohorts Study
title_fullStr Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based New Users High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohorts Study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based New Users High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohorts Study
title_short Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based New Users High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohorts Study
title_sort effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg versus vitamin k antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a population-based new users high-dimensional propensity score matched cohorts study
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025824
work_keys_str_mv AT blinpatrick effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy
AT fauchierlaurent effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy
AT dureaupournincaroline effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy
AT sacherfrederic effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy
AT dallongevillejean effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy
AT bernardmarieagnes effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy
AT lassalleregis effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy
AT drozperroteaucecile effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy
AT moorenicholas effectivenessandsafetyofrivaroxaban15or20mgversusvitaminkantagonistsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationapopulationbasednewusershighdimensionalpropensityscorematchedcohortsstudy