Cargando…

What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis

INTRODUCTION: Measuring patient reported outcomes can improve the quality and effectiveness of healthcare interventions. The aim of this study was to identify the final set of items that can be included in a patient-reported outcome measure to assess recovery of patients following percutaneous coron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soh, Sze-Ee, Barker, Anna L., Ayton, Darshini R., Ahern, Susannah, Morello, Renata, Lefkovits, Jeffrey, Brennan, Angela L., Evans, Susan, Zalcberg, John R., Reid, Christopher M., McNeil, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6728040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31487318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222185
_version_ 1783449367099736064
author Soh, Sze-Ee
Barker, Anna L.
Ayton, Darshini R.
Ahern, Susannah
Morello, Renata
Lefkovits, Jeffrey
Brennan, Angela L.
Evans, Susan
Zalcberg, John R.
Reid, Christopher M.
McNeil, John J.
author_facet Soh, Sze-Ee
Barker, Anna L.
Ayton, Darshini R.
Ahern, Susannah
Morello, Renata
Lefkovits, Jeffrey
Brennan, Angela L.
Evans, Susan
Zalcberg, John R.
Reid, Christopher M.
McNeil, John J.
author_sort Soh, Sze-Ee
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Measuring patient reported outcomes can improve the quality and effectiveness of healthcare interventions. The aim of this study was to identify the final set of items that can be included in a patient-reported outcome measure to assess recovery of patients following percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 200 patients registered in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry participated in a telephone survey 30 days following their percutaneous cardiac procedure. Rasch analysis was used to select the best set of items to form a concise and psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome measure. Key measurement properties assessed included overall fit to the Rasch measurement model, unidimensionality, response formats (thresholds), targeting, internal consistency and measurement invariance. RESULTS: Five items were identified as being reliable and valid measures of patient-reported outcomes: pain or discomfort, shortness of breath, confidence in performing usual activities, feeling unhappy and having trouble sleeping. Data showed overall fit to a Rasch model of expected item functioning (χ(2) 16.99; p = 0.07) and all items demonstrated unidimensionality (t-test less than 0.05 threshold value). Internal consistency was acceptable (equivalent Cronbach’s α 0.65) given there are only five items, but there was a ceiling effect (mean logit score -1.24) with compromised score precision for patients with better recovery. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a succinct set of items that can be used in a patient-reported outcome measure following percutaneous coronary interventions. This patient-report outcome measure has good structural validity and acceptable internal consistency. While further psychometric evaluations are recommended, the items identified capture the patient’s perspective of their recovery following a percutaneous coronary intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6728040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67280402019-09-16 What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis Soh, Sze-Ee Barker, Anna L. Ayton, Darshini R. Ahern, Susannah Morello, Renata Lefkovits, Jeffrey Brennan, Angela L. Evans, Susan Zalcberg, John R. Reid, Christopher M. McNeil, John J. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Measuring patient reported outcomes can improve the quality and effectiveness of healthcare interventions. The aim of this study was to identify the final set of items that can be included in a patient-reported outcome measure to assess recovery of patients following percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 200 patients registered in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry participated in a telephone survey 30 days following their percutaneous cardiac procedure. Rasch analysis was used to select the best set of items to form a concise and psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome measure. Key measurement properties assessed included overall fit to the Rasch measurement model, unidimensionality, response formats (thresholds), targeting, internal consistency and measurement invariance. RESULTS: Five items were identified as being reliable and valid measures of patient-reported outcomes: pain or discomfort, shortness of breath, confidence in performing usual activities, feeling unhappy and having trouble sleeping. Data showed overall fit to a Rasch model of expected item functioning (χ(2) 16.99; p = 0.07) and all items demonstrated unidimensionality (t-test less than 0.05 threshold value). Internal consistency was acceptable (equivalent Cronbach’s α 0.65) given there are only five items, but there was a ceiling effect (mean logit score -1.24) with compromised score precision for patients with better recovery. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a succinct set of items that can be used in a patient-reported outcome measure following percutaneous coronary interventions. This patient-report outcome measure has good structural validity and acceptable internal consistency. While further psychometric evaluations are recommended, the items identified capture the patient’s perspective of their recovery following a percutaneous coronary intervention. Public Library of Science 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6728040/ /pubmed/31487318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222185 Text en © 2019 Soh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Soh, Sze-Ee
Barker, Anna L.
Ayton, Darshini R.
Ahern, Susannah
Morello, Renata
Lefkovits, Jeffrey
Brennan, Angela L.
Evans, Susan
Zalcberg, John R.
Reid, Christopher M.
McNeil, John J.
What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_full What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_fullStr What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_full_unstemmed What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_short What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysis
title_sort what matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? a new patient-reported outcome measure developed using rasch analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6728040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31487318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222185
work_keys_str_mv AT sohszeee whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT barkerannal whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT aytondarshinir whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT ahernsusannah whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT morellorenata whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT lefkovitsjeffrey whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT brennanangelal whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT evanssusan whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT zalcbergjohnr whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT reidchristopherm whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis
AT mcneiljohnj whatmattersmosttopatientsfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuredevelopedusingraschanalysis