Cargando…

Comparable Rates of Integrated Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Between Endurance-Trained Master Athletes and Untrained Older Individuals

BACKGROUND: An impaired muscle anabolic response to exercise and protein nutrition is thought to underpin age-related muscle loss, which may be exacerbated by aspects of biological aging that may not be present in older individuals who have undertaken long-term high-level exercise training, or maste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKendry, James, Shad, Brandon J., Smeuninx, Benoit, Oikawa, Sara Y., Wallis, Gareth, Greig, Carolyn, Phillips, Stuart M., Breen, Leigh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6728413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01084
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: An impaired muscle anabolic response to exercise and protein nutrition is thought to underpin age-related muscle loss, which may be exacerbated by aspects of biological aging that may not be present in older individuals who have undertaken long-term high-level exercise training, or master athletes (MA). The aim of this study was to compare rested-state and exercise-induced rates of integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (iMyoPS) and intracellular signaling in endurance trained MA and healthy age-matched untrained individuals (Older Controls). METHODS: In a parallel study design, iMyoPS rates were determined over 48 h in the rested-state and following a bout of unaccustomed resistance exercise (RE) in OC (n = 8 males; 73.5 ± 3.3 years) and endurance-trained MA (n = 7 males; 68.9 ± 5.7 years). Intramuscular anabolic signaling was also determined. During the iMyoPS measurement period, physical activity was monitored via accelerometry and dietary intake was controlled. RESULTS: Anthropometrics, habitual activity, and dietary intake were similar between groups. There was no difference in rested-state rates of iMyoPS between OC (1.47 ± 0.06%⋅day(–1)) and MA (1.46 ± 0.08%⋅day(–1)). RE significantly increased iMyoPS above rest in both OC (1.60 ± 0.08%⋅day(–1), P < 0.01) and MA (1.61 ± 0.08%⋅day(–1), P < 0.01), with no difference between groups. Akt(Thr308) phosphorylation increased at 1 h post-RE in OC (P < 0.05), but not MA. No other between-group differences in intramuscular signaling were apparent at any time-point. CONCLUSION: While our sample size is limited, these data suggest that rested-state and RE-induced iMyoPS are indistinguishable between MA and OC. Importantly, the OC retain a capacity for RE-induced stimulation of skeletal muscle remodeling.