Cargando…

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes

It is widely recommended that any developed—diagnostic or prognostic—prediction model is externally validated in terms of its predictive performance measured by calibration and discrimination. When multiple validations have been performed, a systematic review followed by a formal meta-analysis helps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Debray, Thomas PA, Damen, Johanna AAG, Riley, Richard D, Snell, Kym, Reitsma, Johannes B, Hooft, Lotty, Collins, Gary S, Moons, Karel GM
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:	Regular Articles
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6728752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30032705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280218785504

Ejemplares similares

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Meta-analysis of prediction model performance across multiple studies: Which scale helps ensure between-study normality for the C-statistic and calibration measures?
por: Snell, Kym IE, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II ‐ binary and time‐to‐event outcomes
por: Riley, Richard D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies
por: Damen, Johanna A.A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Damen, Johanna A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria
por: van Smeden, Maarten, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
por: Debray, Thomas P A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
por: Debray, Thomas P A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Multivariate meta-analysis of individual participant data helped externally validate the performance and implementation of a prediction model
por: Snell, Kym I.E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Developing and validating risk prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis
por: Ahmed, Ikhlaaq, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges
por: Riley, Richard D, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis
por: van Smeden, Maarten, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A tutorial on individualized treatment effect prediction from randomized trials with a binary endpoint
por: Hoogland, Jeroen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
por: Nguyen, Tri‐Long, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement
por: Collins, Gary S., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Diagnostic and Prognostic Modeling Studies: Guidance on Their Use
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis for a Binary Outcome: One-Stage or Two-Stage?
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evidence synthesis in prognosis research
por: Debray, Thomas P.A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Individual participant data meta‐analysis of intervention studies with time‐to‐event outcomes: A review of the methodology and an applied example
por: de Jong, Valentijn M.T., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant‐level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning
por: Riley, Richard D., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
por: Ochodo, Eleanor A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb
por: Snell, Kym I.E., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Individual participant data meta-analyses should not ignore clustering
por: Abo-Zaid, Ghada, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Small-study effects and time trends in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study
por: van Enst, Wynanda Annefloor, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
por: Damen, Johanna A. A. G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Performance of binary prediction models in high-correlation low-dimensional settings: a comparison of methods
por: Leeuwenberg, Artuur M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Detecting small‐study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta‐analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_546es51laa4ednrl1andf45bb8