Cargando…
Interval-cohort designs and bias in the estimation of per-protocol effects: a simulation study
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials are considered the gold standard for making inferences about the causal effects of treatments. However, when protocol deviations occur, the baseline randomization of the trial is no longer sufficient to ensure unbiased estimation of the per-protocol effect: post-randomi...
Autores principales: | Young, Jessica G., Vatsa, Rajet, Murray, Eleanor J., Hernán, Miguel A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3577-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bounding the per-protocol effect in randomized trials: an application to colorectal cancer screening
por: Swanson, Sonja A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Improved adherence adjustment in the Coronary Drug Project
por: Murray, Eleanor J., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
On the Bias of Precision Estimation Under Separate Sampling
por: Xie, Shuilian, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The PROBIT approach in estimating the prevalence of wasting: revisiting bias and precision
por: Blanton, Curtis J, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Combining statistics from two national complex surveys to estimate injury rates per hour exposed and variance by activity in the USA
por: Lin, Tin-chi, et al.
Publicado: (2016)