Cargando…

Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children

BACKGROUND: Follow-up studies of infants born prematurely are essential to understand the long-term consequences of preterm birth and the efficacy of interventions delivered in the neonatal period. Retention of participants for follow-up studies, however, is challenging, with attrition rates of up t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacBean, Victoria, Drysdale, Simon B., Zivanovic, Sanja, Peacock, Janet L., Greenough, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31492117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7575-6
_version_ 1783449529709756416
author MacBean, Victoria
Drysdale, Simon B.
Zivanovic, Sanja
Peacock, Janet L.
Greenough, Anne
author_facet MacBean, Victoria
Drysdale, Simon B.
Zivanovic, Sanja
Peacock, Janet L.
Greenough, Anne
author_sort MacBean, Victoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Follow-up studies of infants born prematurely are essential to understand the long-term consequences of preterm birth and the efficacy of interventions delivered in the neonatal period. Retention of participants for follow-up studies, however, is challenging, with attrition rates of up to 70%. Our aim was to examine retention rates in two follow-up studies of prematurely born children and identify participant or study characteristics that were associated with higher attrition, and to discuss retention strategies with regard to the literature. METHODS: Data from children recruited at birth to one of two studies of prematurely born infants were assessed. The two studies were the United Kingdom Oscillation Study (UKOS, a randomised study comparing two modes of neonatal ventilation in infants born less than 29 weeks of gestational age (GA)), and an observational study examining the impact of viral lower respiratory tract infections in infancy in those born less than 36 weeks of GA (virus study). The UKOS participants, but not those in the virus study, had regularly been contacted throughout the follow-up period. UKOS subjects were followed up at 11 to 14 years of age and subjects in the virus study at 5–7 years of age. At follow up in both studies, pulmonary function and respiratory morbidity were assessed. Retention rates to follow-up in the two studies and baseline characteristics of those who were and were not retained were assessed. RESULTS: Retention was significantly higher in UKOS than the virus study (61% versus 35%, p < 0.0001). Subjects lost to UKOS follow up had greater deprivation scores (p < 0.001), a greater likelihood of intrauterine tobacco exposure (p = 0.001) and were more likely to be of non-white ethnicity (p < 0.001). In the virus study, those lost to follow-up had higher birth weights (p = 0.036) and were less likely to be oxygen dependent at hospital discharge (p = 0.003) or be part of a multiple birth (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Higher retention was demonstrated when there was regular contact in the follow-up period. Both social factors and initial illness severity affected the retention into follow-up studies of prematurely born infants, though these factors were not consistent across the two studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6729033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67290332019-09-12 Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children MacBean, Victoria Drysdale, Simon B. Zivanovic, Sanja Peacock, Janet L. Greenough, Anne BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Follow-up studies of infants born prematurely are essential to understand the long-term consequences of preterm birth and the efficacy of interventions delivered in the neonatal period. Retention of participants for follow-up studies, however, is challenging, with attrition rates of up to 70%. Our aim was to examine retention rates in two follow-up studies of prematurely born children and identify participant or study characteristics that were associated with higher attrition, and to discuss retention strategies with regard to the literature. METHODS: Data from children recruited at birth to one of two studies of prematurely born infants were assessed. The two studies were the United Kingdom Oscillation Study (UKOS, a randomised study comparing two modes of neonatal ventilation in infants born less than 29 weeks of gestational age (GA)), and an observational study examining the impact of viral lower respiratory tract infections in infancy in those born less than 36 weeks of GA (virus study). The UKOS participants, but not those in the virus study, had regularly been contacted throughout the follow-up period. UKOS subjects were followed up at 11 to 14 years of age and subjects in the virus study at 5–7 years of age. At follow up in both studies, pulmonary function and respiratory morbidity were assessed. Retention rates to follow-up in the two studies and baseline characteristics of those who were and were not retained were assessed. RESULTS: Retention was significantly higher in UKOS than the virus study (61% versus 35%, p < 0.0001). Subjects lost to UKOS follow up had greater deprivation scores (p < 0.001), a greater likelihood of intrauterine tobacco exposure (p = 0.001) and were more likely to be of non-white ethnicity (p < 0.001). In the virus study, those lost to follow-up had higher birth weights (p = 0.036) and were less likely to be oxygen dependent at hospital discharge (p = 0.003) or be part of a multiple birth (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Higher retention was demonstrated when there was regular contact in the follow-up period. Both social factors and initial illness severity affected the retention into follow-up studies of prematurely born infants, though these factors were not consistent across the two studies. BioMed Central 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6729033/ /pubmed/31492117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7575-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
MacBean, Victoria
Drysdale, Simon B.
Zivanovic, Sanja
Peacock, Janet L.
Greenough, Anne
Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children
title Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children
title_full Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children
title_fullStr Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children
title_full_unstemmed Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children
title_short Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children
title_sort participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31492117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7575-6
work_keys_str_mv AT macbeanvictoria participantretentioninfollowupstudiesofprematurelybornchildren
AT drysdalesimonb participantretentioninfollowupstudiesofprematurelybornchildren
AT zivanovicsanja participantretentioninfollowupstudiesofprematurelybornchildren
AT peacockjanetl participantretentioninfollowupstudiesofprematurelybornchildren
AT greenoughanne participantretentioninfollowupstudiesofprematurelybornchildren