Cargando…

Evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry

BACKGROUND: Consumers purchase fresh strawberries all year long. Extending the fruiting season for new strawberry cultivars is a common breeding goal. Understanding the inheritance of repeat fruiting is key to improving breeding efficiency. Several independent research groups using multiple genotype...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewers, K. S., Castro, P., Hancock, J. F., Weebadde, C. K., Die, J. V., Rowland, L. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1984-7
_version_ 1783449533145939968
author Lewers, K. S.
Castro, P.
Hancock, J. F.
Weebadde, C. K.
Die, J. V.
Rowland, L. J.
author_facet Lewers, K. S.
Castro, P.
Hancock, J. F.
Weebadde, C. K.
Die, J. V.
Rowland, L. J.
author_sort Lewers, K. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consumers purchase fresh strawberries all year long. Extending the fruiting season for new strawberry cultivars is a common breeding goal. Understanding the inheritance of repeat fruiting is key to improving breeding efficiency. Several independent research groups using multiple genotypes and analytic approaches have all identified a single genomic region in strawberry associated with repeat fruiting. Markers mapped to this region were used to evaluate breeding parents from the United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) strawberry breeding program at Beltsville, Maryland. RESULTS: Markers mapped to repeat fruiting identified once-fruiting genotypes but not repeat-fruiting genotypes. Eleven of twenty-three breeding parents with repeat-fruiting marker profiles were actually once fruiting, indicating at least one additional locus acting epistatically to suppress repeat fruiting. Family segregation ratios could not be predicted reliably by the combined use of parental phenotypes and marker profiles, when using a single-gene model. Expected segregation ratios were calculated for all phenotypic and marker-profile combinations possible from the mapped locus combined with a hypothetical dominant or recessive suppressor locus. Segregation ratios specific to an epistatic suppressor acting on the mapped locus were observed in four families. The segregation ratios for two families were best explained by a dominant suppressor acting on the mapped locus, and, for the other two, by a recessive suppressor. Not all of the observed ratios could be explained by one model or the other, and when multiple families with a common parent were compared, there was no predicted genotype for the common parent that would lead to all of the observed segregation ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Considering all lines of evidence in this study and others, repeat-fruiting in commercial strawberry is controlled primarily by a dominant allele at a single locus, previously mapped by multiple groups. At least two additional genes, one dominant and one recessive, exist that act epistatically to suppress repeat fruiting. Environmental effects and/or incomplete penetrance likely affect phenotype through the suppressor loci, rather than the primary mapped locus. One of the dominant suppressors acts only in the first year, the year the plant is germinated from seed, and not after the plant has experienced a winter. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1984-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6729047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67290472019-09-12 Evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry Lewers, K. S. Castro, P. Hancock, J. F. Weebadde, C. K. Die, J. V. Rowland, L. J. BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Consumers purchase fresh strawberries all year long. Extending the fruiting season for new strawberry cultivars is a common breeding goal. Understanding the inheritance of repeat fruiting is key to improving breeding efficiency. Several independent research groups using multiple genotypes and analytic approaches have all identified a single genomic region in strawberry associated with repeat fruiting. Markers mapped to this region were used to evaluate breeding parents from the United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) strawberry breeding program at Beltsville, Maryland. RESULTS: Markers mapped to repeat fruiting identified once-fruiting genotypes but not repeat-fruiting genotypes. Eleven of twenty-three breeding parents with repeat-fruiting marker profiles were actually once fruiting, indicating at least one additional locus acting epistatically to suppress repeat fruiting. Family segregation ratios could not be predicted reliably by the combined use of parental phenotypes and marker profiles, when using a single-gene model. Expected segregation ratios were calculated for all phenotypic and marker-profile combinations possible from the mapped locus combined with a hypothetical dominant or recessive suppressor locus. Segregation ratios specific to an epistatic suppressor acting on the mapped locus were observed in four families. The segregation ratios for two families were best explained by a dominant suppressor acting on the mapped locus, and, for the other two, by a recessive suppressor. Not all of the observed ratios could be explained by one model or the other, and when multiple families with a common parent were compared, there was no predicted genotype for the common parent that would lead to all of the observed segregation ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Considering all lines of evidence in this study and others, repeat-fruiting in commercial strawberry is controlled primarily by a dominant allele at a single locus, previously mapped by multiple groups. At least two additional genes, one dominant and one recessive, exist that act epistatically to suppress repeat fruiting. Environmental effects and/or incomplete penetrance likely affect phenotype through the suppressor loci, rather than the primary mapped locus. One of the dominant suppressors acts only in the first year, the year the plant is germinated from seed, and not after the plant has experienced a winter. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1984-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6729047/ /pubmed/31488054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1984-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lewers, K. S.
Castro, P.
Hancock, J. F.
Weebadde, C. K.
Die, J. V.
Rowland, L. J.
Evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry
title Evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry
title_full Evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry
title_fullStr Evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry
title_short Evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry
title_sort evidence of epistatic suppression of repeat fruiting in cultivated strawberry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1984-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lewersks evidenceofepistaticsuppressionofrepeatfruitingincultivatedstrawberry
AT castrop evidenceofepistaticsuppressionofrepeatfruitingincultivatedstrawberry
AT hancockjf evidenceofepistaticsuppressionofrepeatfruitingincultivatedstrawberry
AT weebaddeck evidenceofepistaticsuppressionofrepeatfruitingincultivatedstrawberry
AT diejv evidenceofepistaticsuppressionofrepeatfruitingincultivatedstrawberry
AT rowlandlj evidenceofepistaticsuppressionofrepeatfruitingincultivatedstrawberry