Cargando…

Biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (PRT) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model

BACKGROUND: Peak reverse torque (PRT) is a valid method to evaluate implants’ secondary stability in the healing bone. The secondary stability is achieved by the implant over time and it has been positively correlated with the implants’ osseointegration level. In other words, peak reverse torque is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grzeskowiak, Remigiusz M., Wheeler, Carrie, Taylor, Elizabeth, Lillich, James, Roush, James, Biris, Alexandru S., Anderson, David E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2058-7
_version_ 1783449537577222144
author Grzeskowiak, Remigiusz M.
Wheeler, Carrie
Taylor, Elizabeth
Lillich, James
Roush, James
Biris, Alexandru S.
Anderson, David E.
author_facet Grzeskowiak, Remigiusz M.
Wheeler, Carrie
Taylor, Elizabeth
Lillich, James
Roush, James
Biris, Alexandru S.
Anderson, David E.
author_sort Grzeskowiak, Remigiusz M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peak reverse torque (PRT) is a valid method to evaluate implants’ secondary stability in the healing bone. The secondary stability is achieved by the implant over time and it has been positively correlated with the implants’ osseointegration level. In other words, peak reverse torque is the force required to break the bone-implant interface. The purpose of this study was to compare the peak reverse torque for the self-tapping and non-self-tapping screws used in a dynamic compression plate–screw–bone construct after 60 days of loading when used to stabilize 2.5-cm defects in the tibia of goats. The second objective was to compare the peak removal torque of the screws placed in the different positions to evaluate the impact of construct biomechanics on implants osseointegration. RESULTS: In total, 176 non-self-tapping screws and 66 self-tapping screws were used to fix the 8-holes dynamic compression plates to the bones. The screws were placed in the tibiae from proximal (position sites 1,2, 3) to distal (position sites 4,5,6) and were removed 60 days post-implantation. The animals remained weight-bearing throughout the study period. The screws placed in the proximal diaphysis had significantly less peak reverse torque than screws placed in the distal diaphysis in both groups (p < 0.05). The peak reverse torque resistance was also significantly less for the non-self-tapping screws as compared with the self-tapping screws (p < 0.05). The intracortical fractures in the trans-cortex occurred significantly more frequently during the placement of non-self-tapping screws (p < 0.05) as compared with self-tapping screws (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we concluded that self-tapping screws may be expected to maintain a more stable bone-implant interface during the first 60 days of loading as compared with non-self-tapping screws. This should be a consideration for orthopedic surgeons and scientists using bone plates to stabilize non-load sharing fractures when a stable plate-screw-bone interface is needed to ensure prolonged stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6729065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67290652019-09-12 Biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (PRT) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model Grzeskowiak, Remigiusz M. Wheeler, Carrie Taylor, Elizabeth Lillich, James Roush, James Biris, Alexandru S. Anderson, David E. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Peak reverse torque (PRT) is a valid method to evaluate implants’ secondary stability in the healing bone. The secondary stability is achieved by the implant over time and it has been positively correlated with the implants’ osseointegration level. In other words, peak reverse torque is the force required to break the bone-implant interface. The purpose of this study was to compare the peak reverse torque for the self-tapping and non-self-tapping screws used in a dynamic compression plate–screw–bone construct after 60 days of loading when used to stabilize 2.5-cm defects in the tibia of goats. The second objective was to compare the peak removal torque of the screws placed in the different positions to evaluate the impact of construct biomechanics on implants osseointegration. RESULTS: In total, 176 non-self-tapping screws and 66 self-tapping screws were used to fix the 8-holes dynamic compression plates to the bones. The screws were placed in the tibiae from proximal (position sites 1,2, 3) to distal (position sites 4,5,6) and were removed 60 days post-implantation. The animals remained weight-bearing throughout the study period. The screws placed in the proximal diaphysis had significantly less peak reverse torque than screws placed in the distal diaphysis in both groups (p < 0.05). The peak reverse torque resistance was also significantly less for the non-self-tapping screws as compared with the self-tapping screws (p < 0.05). The intracortical fractures in the trans-cortex occurred significantly more frequently during the placement of non-self-tapping screws (p < 0.05) as compared with self-tapping screws (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we concluded that self-tapping screws may be expected to maintain a more stable bone-implant interface during the first 60 days of loading as compared with non-self-tapping screws. This should be a consideration for orthopedic surgeons and scientists using bone plates to stabilize non-load sharing fractures when a stable plate-screw-bone interface is needed to ensure prolonged stability. BioMed Central 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6729065/ /pubmed/31488151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2058-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grzeskowiak, Remigiusz M.
Wheeler, Carrie
Taylor, Elizabeth
Lillich, James
Roush, James
Biris, Alexandru S.
Anderson, David E.
Biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (PRT) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model
title Biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (PRT) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (PRT) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (PRT) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (PRT) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (PRT) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of peak reverse torque (prt) in a dynamic compression plate-screw construct used in a goat tibia segmental defect model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2058-7
work_keys_str_mv AT grzeskowiakremigiuszm biomechanicalevaluationofpeakreversetorqueprtinadynamiccompressionplatescrewconstructusedinagoattibiasegmentaldefectmodel
AT wheelercarrie biomechanicalevaluationofpeakreversetorqueprtinadynamiccompressionplatescrewconstructusedinagoattibiasegmentaldefectmodel
AT taylorelizabeth biomechanicalevaluationofpeakreversetorqueprtinadynamiccompressionplatescrewconstructusedinagoattibiasegmentaldefectmodel
AT lillichjames biomechanicalevaluationofpeakreversetorqueprtinadynamiccompressionplatescrewconstructusedinagoattibiasegmentaldefectmodel
AT roushjames biomechanicalevaluationofpeakreversetorqueprtinadynamiccompressionplatescrewconstructusedinagoattibiasegmentaldefectmodel
AT birisalexandrus biomechanicalevaluationofpeakreversetorqueprtinadynamiccompressionplatescrewconstructusedinagoattibiasegmentaldefectmodel
AT andersondavide biomechanicalevaluationofpeakreversetorqueprtinadynamiccompressionplatescrewconstructusedinagoattibiasegmentaldefectmodel