Cargando…

Early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a Japanese nationwide trauma database study

BACKGROUND: The management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) has changed drastically in the last decades, and surgery is the primary treatment. However, the optimum timing of early surgical treatment (within 24 h or 72 h after injury) is still controversial. We sought to determine the optimum tim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Chie, Tagami, Takashi, Kaneko, Junya, Fukuda, Reo, Nakayama, Fumihiko, Sato, Shin, Takehara, Akiko, Kudo, Saori, Kuno, Masamune, Kondo, Masayoshi, Unemoto, Kyoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1341-4
_version_ 1783449538499969024
author Tanaka, Chie
Tagami, Takashi
Kaneko, Junya
Fukuda, Reo
Nakayama, Fumihiko
Sato, Shin
Takehara, Akiko
Kudo, Saori
Kuno, Masamune
Kondo, Masayoshi
Unemoto, Kyoko
author_facet Tanaka, Chie
Tagami, Takashi
Kaneko, Junya
Fukuda, Reo
Nakayama, Fumihiko
Sato, Shin
Takehara, Akiko
Kudo, Saori
Kuno, Masamune
Kondo, Masayoshi
Unemoto, Kyoko
author_sort Tanaka, Chie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) has changed drastically in the last decades, and surgery is the primary treatment. However, the optimum timing of early surgical treatment (within 24 h or 72 h after injury) is still controversial. We sought to determine the optimum timing of surgery for cervical SCI, comparing the length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent surgical treatments (decompression and stabilization) for cervical SCI within 24 h after injury and within 7 days after injury. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) which is a nationwide, multicenter database. We selected adult isolated cervical SCI patients who underwent operative management within 7 days after injury, between 2004 and 2015. The main outcome measures were the length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality. We grouped the patients into two, based on the time from onset of injury to surgery, an early group (within 24 h) and a late group (from 25 h to 7 days). Next, we performed multivariable analyses for analyzing the relevance between the timing of surgery and the length of ICU stay after adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score. We also performed the Cox survival analyses to evaluate in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: From 236,698 trauma patients registered in JTDB, we analyzed 514 patients. The early group comprised 291 patients (56.6%), and the late group comprised 223 (43.4%). The length of ICU stay did not differ between the two groups (early, 10 days; late, 11 days; p = 0.29). There was no significant difference for length of ICU stay between the early and late group even after adjustment by multivariate analysis (p = 0.64). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (the early group 3.8%, the late group 2.2%, p = 0.32), and no significant difference was found in the Cox survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that neither the length of ICU stay nor in-hospital mortality after spinal column stabilization or spinal cord decompression for cervical SCI significantly differed according to the timing of surgery between 24 h and 7 days.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6729069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67290692019-09-12 Early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a Japanese nationwide trauma database study Tanaka, Chie Tagami, Takashi Kaneko, Junya Fukuda, Reo Nakayama, Fumihiko Sato, Shin Takehara, Akiko Kudo, Saori Kuno, Masamune Kondo, Masayoshi Unemoto, Kyoko J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) has changed drastically in the last decades, and surgery is the primary treatment. However, the optimum timing of early surgical treatment (within 24 h or 72 h after injury) is still controversial. We sought to determine the optimum timing of surgery for cervical SCI, comparing the length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent surgical treatments (decompression and stabilization) for cervical SCI within 24 h after injury and within 7 days after injury. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) which is a nationwide, multicenter database. We selected adult isolated cervical SCI patients who underwent operative management within 7 days after injury, between 2004 and 2015. The main outcome measures were the length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality. We grouped the patients into two, based on the time from onset of injury to surgery, an early group (within 24 h) and a late group (from 25 h to 7 days). Next, we performed multivariable analyses for analyzing the relevance between the timing of surgery and the length of ICU stay after adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score. We also performed the Cox survival analyses to evaluate in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: From 236,698 trauma patients registered in JTDB, we analyzed 514 patients. The early group comprised 291 patients (56.6%), and the late group comprised 223 (43.4%). The length of ICU stay did not differ between the two groups (early, 10 days; late, 11 days; p = 0.29). There was no significant difference for length of ICU stay between the early and late group even after adjustment by multivariate analysis (p = 0.64). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (the early group 3.8%, the late group 2.2%, p = 0.32), and no significant difference was found in the Cox survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that neither the length of ICU stay nor in-hospital mortality after spinal column stabilization or spinal cord decompression for cervical SCI significantly differed according to the timing of surgery between 24 h and 7 days. BioMed Central 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6729069/ /pubmed/31488166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1341-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tanaka, Chie
Tagami, Takashi
Kaneko, Junya
Fukuda, Reo
Nakayama, Fumihiko
Sato, Shin
Takehara, Akiko
Kudo, Saori
Kuno, Masamune
Kondo, Masayoshi
Unemoto, Kyoko
Early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a Japanese nationwide trauma database study
title Early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a Japanese nationwide trauma database study
title_full Early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a Japanese nationwide trauma database study
title_fullStr Early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a Japanese nationwide trauma database study
title_full_unstemmed Early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a Japanese nationwide trauma database study
title_short Early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a Japanese nationwide trauma database study
title_sort early versus late surgery after cervical spinal cord injury: a japanese nationwide trauma database study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1341-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakachie earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT tagamitakashi earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT kanekojunya earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT fukudareo earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT nakayamafumihiko earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT satoshin earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT takeharaakiko earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT kudosaori earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT kunomasamune earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT kondomasayoshi earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy
AT unemotokyoko earlyversuslatesurgeryaftercervicalspinalcordinjuryajapanesenationwidetraumadatabasestudy