Cargando…

Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study

BACKGROUND: Although Web-based questionnaires are an efficient, increasingly popular mode of data collection, their utility is often challenged by high participant dropout. Researchers can gain insight into potential causes of high participant dropout by analyzing the dropout patterns. OBJECTIVE: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hochheimer, Camille J, Sabo, Roy T, Perera, Robert A, Mukhopadhyay, Nitai, Krist, Alex H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444875
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12811
_version_ 1783449549252067328
author Hochheimer, Camille J
Sabo, Roy T
Perera, Robert A
Mukhopadhyay, Nitai
Krist, Alex H
author_facet Hochheimer, Camille J
Sabo, Roy T
Perera, Robert A
Mukhopadhyay, Nitai
Krist, Alex H
author_sort Hochheimer, Camille J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although Web-based questionnaires are an efficient, increasingly popular mode of data collection, their utility is often challenged by high participant dropout. Researchers can gain insight into potential causes of high participant dropout by analyzing the dropout patterns. OBJECTIVE: This study proposed the application of and assessed the use of user-specified and existing hypothesis testing methods in a novel setting—survey dropout data—to identify phases of higher or lower survey dropout. METHODS: First, we proposed the application of user-specified thresholds to identify abrupt differences in the dropout rate. Second, we proposed the application of 2 existing hypothesis testing methods to detect significant differences in participant dropout. We assessed these methods through a simulation study and through application to a case study, featuring a questionnaire addressing decision-making surrounding cancer screening. RESULTS: The user-specified method set to a low threshold performed best at accurately detecting phases of high attrition in both the simulation study and test case application, although all proposed methods were too sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: The user-specified method set to a low threshold correctly identified the attrition phases. Hypothesis testing methods, although sensitive at times, were unable to accurately identify the attrition phases. These results strengthen the case for further development of and research surrounding the science of attrition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6729115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67291152019-09-23 Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study Hochheimer, Camille J Sabo, Roy T Perera, Robert A Mukhopadhyay, Nitai Krist, Alex H J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Although Web-based questionnaires are an efficient, increasingly popular mode of data collection, their utility is often challenged by high participant dropout. Researchers can gain insight into potential causes of high participant dropout by analyzing the dropout patterns. OBJECTIVE: This study proposed the application of and assessed the use of user-specified and existing hypothesis testing methods in a novel setting—survey dropout data—to identify phases of higher or lower survey dropout. METHODS: First, we proposed the application of user-specified thresholds to identify abrupt differences in the dropout rate. Second, we proposed the application of 2 existing hypothesis testing methods to detect significant differences in participant dropout. We assessed these methods through a simulation study and through application to a case study, featuring a questionnaire addressing decision-making surrounding cancer screening. RESULTS: The user-specified method set to a low threshold performed best at accurately detecting phases of high attrition in both the simulation study and test case application, although all proposed methods were too sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: The user-specified method set to a low threshold correctly identified the attrition phases. Hypothesis testing methods, although sensitive at times, were unable to accurately identify the attrition phases. These results strengthen the case for further development of and research surrounding the science of attrition. JMIR Publications 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6729115/ /pubmed/31444875 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12811 Text en ©Camille J Hochheimer, Roy T Sabo, Robert A Perera, Nitai Mukhopadhyay, Alex H Krist. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 23.08.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hochheimer, Camille J
Sabo, Roy T
Perera, Robert A
Mukhopadhyay, Nitai
Krist, Alex H
Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study
title Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study
title_full Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study
title_fullStr Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study
title_short Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study
title_sort identifying attrition phases in survey data: applicability and assessment study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444875
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12811
work_keys_str_mv AT hochheimercamillej identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy
AT saboroyt identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy
AT pereraroberta identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy
AT mukhopadhyaynitai identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy
AT kristalexh identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy