Cargando…
Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study
BACKGROUND: Although Web-based questionnaires are an efficient, increasingly popular mode of data collection, their utility is often challenged by high participant dropout. Researchers can gain insight into potential causes of high participant dropout by analyzing the dropout patterns. OBJECTIVE: Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444875 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12811 |
_version_ | 1783449549252067328 |
---|---|
author | Hochheimer, Camille J Sabo, Roy T Perera, Robert A Mukhopadhyay, Nitai Krist, Alex H |
author_facet | Hochheimer, Camille J Sabo, Roy T Perera, Robert A Mukhopadhyay, Nitai Krist, Alex H |
author_sort | Hochheimer, Camille J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although Web-based questionnaires are an efficient, increasingly popular mode of data collection, their utility is often challenged by high participant dropout. Researchers can gain insight into potential causes of high participant dropout by analyzing the dropout patterns. OBJECTIVE: This study proposed the application of and assessed the use of user-specified and existing hypothesis testing methods in a novel setting—survey dropout data—to identify phases of higher or lower survey dropout. METHODS: First, we proposed the application of user-specified thresholds to identify abrupt differences in the dropout rate. Second, we proposed the application of 2 existing hypothesis testing methods to detect significant differences in participant dropout. We assessed these methods through a simulation study and through application to a case study, featuring a questionnaire addressing decision-making surrounding cancer screening. RESULTS: The user-specified method set to a low threshold performed best at accurately detecting phases of high attrition in both the simulation study and test case application, although all proposed methods were too sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: The user-specified method set to a low threshold correctly identified the attrition phases. Hypothesis testing methods, although sensitive at times, were unable to accurately identify the attrition phases. These results strengthen the case for further development of and research surrounding the science of attrition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6729115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67291152019-09-23 Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study Hochheimer, Camille J Sabo, Roy T Perera, Robert A Mukhopadhyay, Nitai Krist, Alex H J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Although Web-based questionnaires are an efficient, increasingly popular mode of data collection, their utility is often challenged by high participant dropout. Researchers can gain insight into potential causes of high participant dropout by analyzing the dropout patterns. OBJECTIVE: This study proposed the application of and assessed the use of user-specified and existing hypothesis testing methods in a novel setting—survey dropout data—to identify phases of higher or lower survey dropout. METHODS: First, we proposed the application of user-specified thresholds to identify abrupt differences in the dropout rate. Second, we proposed the application of 2 existing hypothesis testing methods to detect significant differences in participant dropout. We assessed these methods through a simulation study and through application to a case study, featuring a questionnaire addressing decision-making surrounding cancer screening. RESULTS: The user-specified method set to a low threshold performed best at accurately detecting phases of high attrition in both the simulation study and test case application, although all proposed methods were too sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: The user-specified method set to a low threshold correctly identified the attrition phases. Hypothesis testing methods, although sensitive at times, were unable to accurately identify the attrition phases. These results strengthen the case for further development of and research surrounding the science of attrition. JMIR Publications 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6729115/ /pubmed/31444875 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12811 Text en ©Camille J Hochheimer, Roy T Sabo, Robert A Perera, Nitai Mukhopadhyay, Alex H Krist. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 23.08.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Hochheimer, Camille J Sabo, Roy T Perera, Robert A Mukhopadhyay, Nitai Krist, Alex H Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study |
title | Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study |
title_full | Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study |
title_fullStr | Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study |
title_short | Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study |
title_sort | identifying attrition phases in survey data: applicability and assessment study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6729115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444875 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hochheimercamillej identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy AT saboroyt identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy AT pereraroberta identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy AT mukhopadhyaynitai identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy AT kristalexh identifyingattritionphasesinsurveydataapplicabilityandassessmentstudy |