Cargando…

Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: During routine post-kidney transplant care, most European transplant physicians screen patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria. The usefulness of this strategy is debated. To make screening cost-effective, asymptomatic bacteriuria should be prevalent enough to justify the expense, and anti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coussement, Julien, Scemla, Anne, Hougardy, Jean-Michel, Sberro-Soussan, Rebecca, Amrouche, Lucile, Catalano, Concetta, Johnson, James R., Abramowicz, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6730876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221820
_version_ 1783449594408992768
author Coussement, Julien
Scemla, Anne
Hougardy, Jean-Michel
Sberro-Soussan, Rebecca
Amrouche, Lucile
Catalano, Concetta
Johnson, James R.
Abramowicz, Daniel
author_facet Coussement, Julien
Scemla, Anne
Hougardy, Jean-Michel
Sberro-Soussan, Rebecca
Amrouche, Lucile
Catalano, Concetta
Johnson, James R.
Abramowicz, Daniel
author_sort Coussement, Julien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During routine post-kidney transplant care, most European transplant physicians screen patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria. The usefulness of this strategy is debated. To make screening cost-effective, asymptomatic bacteriuria should be prevalent enough to justify the expense, and antibiotics should improve patient outcomes significantly if asymptomatic bacteriuria is detected. Regrettably, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients is not well defined. METHODS: To determine the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients, we did a cross-sectional study among kidney transplant recipients undergoing routine surveillance in three outpatient transplant clinics in Belgium and France. We excluded patients who were in the first two months post-transplantation and/or had a urinary catheter. Asymptomatic participants who had a urine culture with one organism isolated at ≥ 10(5) CFU/mL were asked to provide a confirmatory urine specimen. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was defined per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. RESULTS: We screened 500 consecutive kidney transplant recipients. Overall, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was 3.4% (17/500 patients). It was similarly low among kidney transplant recipients who were between 2 and 12 months after transplantation (1.3%, 1/76 patients) and those who were farther after transplantation (3.8%, 16/424 patients: p = 0.49). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was significantly associated with female gender (risk ratio 3.7, 95% CI 1.3–10.3, p = 0.007) and older age (mean age: 61 ± 12 years [bacteriuric participants], versus 53 ± 15 years [non-bacteriuric participants], p = 0.03). One participant’s colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolate carried the globally disseminated mcr-1 gene. CONCLUSIONS: Among kidney transplant recipients who are beyond the second month post-transplant, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is low. Further studies are needed to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of a screen-and-treat strategy for asymptomatic bacteriuria in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6730876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67308762019-09-16 Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study Coussement, Julien Scemla, Anne Hougardy, Jean-Michel Sberro-Soussan, Rebecca Amrouche, Lucile Catalano, Concetta Johnson, James R. Abramowicz, Daniel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: During routine post-kidney transplant care, most European transplant physicians screen patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria. The usefulness of this strategy is debated. To make screening cost-effective, asymptomatic bacteriuria should be prevalent enough to justify the expense, and antibiotics should improve patient outcomes significantly if asymptomatic bacteriuria is detected. Regrettably, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients is not well defined. METHODS: To determine the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients, we did a cross-sectional study among kidney transplant recipients undergoing routine surveillance in three outpatient transplant clinics in Belgium and France. We excluded patients who were in the first two months post-transplantation and/or had a urinary catheter. Asymptomatic participants who had a urine culture with one organism isolated at ≥ 10(5) CFU/mL were asked to provide a confirmatory urine specimen. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was defined per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. RESULTS: We screened 500 consecutive kidney transplant recipients. Overall, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was 3.4% (17/500 patients). It was similarly low among kidney transplant recipients who were between 2 and 12 months after transplantation (1.3%, 1/76 patients) and those who were farther after transplantation (3.8%, 16/424 patients: p = 0.49). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was significantly associated with female gender (risk ratio 3.7, 95% CI 1.3–10.3, p = 0.007) and older age (mean age: 61 ± 12 years [bacteriuric participants], versus 53 ± 15 years [non-bacteriuric participants], p = 0.03). One participant’s colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolate carried the globally disseminated mcr-1 gene. CONCLUSIONS: Among kidney transplant recipients who are beyond the second month post-transplant, the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is low. Further studies are needed to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of a screen-and-treat strategy for asymptomatic bacteriuria in this population. Public Library of Science 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6730876/ /pubmed/31490951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221820 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coussement, Julien
Scemla, Anne
Hougardy, Jean-Michel
Sberro-Soussan, Rebecca
Amrouche, Lucile
Catalano, Concetta
Johnson, James R.
Abramowicz, Daniel
Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study
title Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study
title_full Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study
title_short Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study
title_sort prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among kidney transplant recipients beyond two months post-transplant: a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6730876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221820
work_keys_str_mv AT coussementjulien prevalenceofasymptomaticbacteriuriaamongkidneytransplantrecipientsbeyondtwomonthsposttransplantamulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT scemlaanne prevalenceofasymptomaticbacteriuriaamongkidneytransplantrecipientsbeyondtwomonthsposttransplantamulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT hougardyjeanmichel prevalenceofasymptomaticbacteriuriaamongkidneytransplantrecipientsbeyondtwomonthsposttransplantamulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT sberrosoussanrebecca prevalenceofasymptomaticbacteriuriaamongkidneytransplantrecipientsbeyondtwomonthsposttransplantamulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT amrouchelucile prevalenceofasymptomaticbacteriuriaamongkidneytransplantrecipientsbeyondtwomonthsposttransplantamulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT catalanoconcetta prevalenceofasymptomaticbacteriuriaamongkidneytransplantrecipientsbeyondtwomonthsposttransplantamulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT johnsonjamesr prevalenceofasymptomaticbacteriuriaamongkidneytransplantrecipientsbeyondtwomonthsposttransplantamulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT abramowiczdaniel prevalenceofasymptomaticbacteriuriaamongkidneytransplantrecipientsbeyondtwomonthsposttransplantamulticenterprospectivecrosssectionalstudy