Cargando…
Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice
Prejudiced attitudes and political nationalism vary widely around the world, but there has been little research on what predicts this variation. Here we examine the ecological and cultural factors underlying the worldwide distribution of prejudice. We suggest that cultures grow more prejudiced when...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6730889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221953 |
_version_ | 1783449597516972032 |
---|---|
author | Jackson, Joshua Conrad van Egmond, Marieke Choi, Virginia K. Ember, Carol R. Halberstadt, Jamin Balanovic, Jovana Basker, Inger N. Boehnke, Klaus Buki, Noemi Fischer, Ronald Fulop, Marta Fulmer, Ashley Homan, Astrid C. van Kleef, Gerben A. Kreemers, Loes Schei, Vidar Szabo, Erna Ward, Colleen Gelfand, Michele J. |
author_facet | Jackson, Joshua Conrad van Egmond, Marieke Choi, Virginia K. Ember, Carol R. Halberstadt, Jamin Balanovic, Jovana Basker, Inger N. Boehnke, Klaus Buki, Noemi Fischer, Ronald Fulop, Marta Fulmer, Ashley Homan, Astrid C. van Kleef, Gerben A. Kreemers, Loes Schei, Vidar Szabo, Erna Ward, Colleen Gelfand, Michele J. |
author_sort | Jackson, Joshua Conrad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prejudiced attitudes and political nationalism vary widely around the world, but there has been little research on what predicts this variation. Here we examine the ecological and cultural factors underlying the worldwide distribution of prejudice. We suggest that cultures grow more prejudiced when they tighten cultural norms in response to destabilizing ecological threats. A set of seven archival analyses, surveys, and experiments (∑N = 3,986,402) find that nations, American states, and pre-industrial societies with tighter cultural norms show the most prejudice based on skin color, religion, nationality, and sexuality, and that tightness predicts why prejudice is often highest in areas of the world with histories of ecological threat. People’s support for cultural tightness also mediates the link between perceived ecological threat and intentions to vote for nationalist politicians. Results replicate when controlling for economic development, inequality, conservatism, residential mobility, and shared cultural heritage. These findings offer a cultural evolutionary perspective on prejudice, with implications for immigration, intercultural conflict, and radicalization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6730889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67308892019-09-16 Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice Jackson, Joshua Conrad van Egmond, Marieke Choi, Virginia K. Ember, Carol R. Halberstadt, Jamin Balanovic, Jovana Basker, Inger N. Boehnke, Klaus Buki, Noemi Fischer, Ronald Fulop, Marta Fulmer, Ashley Homan, Astrid C. van Kleef, Gerben A. Kreemers, Loes Schei, Vidar Szabo, Erna Ward, Colleen Gelfand, Michele J. PLoS One Research Article Prejudiced attitudes and political nationalism vary widely around the world, but there has been little research on what predicts this variation. Here we examine the ecological and cultural factors underlying the worldwide distribution of prejudice. We suggest that cultures grow more prejudiced when they tighten cultural norms in response to destabilizing ecological threats. A set of seven archival analyses, surveys, and experiments (∑N = 3,986,402) find that nations, American states, and pre-industrial societies with tighter cultural norms show the most prejudice based on skin color, religion, nationality, and sexuality, and that tightness predicts why prejudice is often highest in areas of the world with histories of ecological threat. People’s support for cultural tightness also mediates the link between perceived ecological threat and intentions to vote for nationalist politicians. Results replicate when controlling for economic development, inequality, conservatism, residential mobility, and shared cultural heritage. These findings offer a cultural evolutionary perspective on prejudice, with implications for immigration, intercultural conflict, and radicalization. Public Library of Science 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6730889/ /pubmed/31490981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221953 Text en © 2019 Jackson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jackson, Joshua Conrad van Egmond, Marieke Choi, Virginia K. Ember, Carol R. Halberstadt, Jamin Balanovic, Jovana Basker, Inger N. Boehnke, Klaus Buki, Noemi Fischer, Ronald Fulop, Marta Fulmer, Ashley Homan, Astrid C. van Kleef, Gerben A. Kreemers, Loes Schei, Vidar Szabo, Erna Ward, Colleen Gelfand, Michele J. Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice |
title | Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice |
title_full | Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice |
title_fullStr | Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice |
title_full_unstemmed | Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice |
title_short | Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice |
title_sort | ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6730889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacksonjoshuaconrad ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT vanegmondmarieke ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT choivirginiak ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT embercarolr ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT halberstadtjamin ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT balanovicjovana ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT baskeringern ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT boehnkeklaus ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT bukinoemi ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT fischerronald ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT fulopmarta ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT fulmerashley ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT homanastridc ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT vankleefgerbena ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT kreemersloes ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT scheividar ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT szaboerna ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT wardcolleen ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice AT gelfandmichelej ecologicalandculturalfactorsunderlyingtheglobaldistributionofprejudice |