Cargando…
Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones
BACKGROUND: The usefulness of prophylactic biliary stenting for patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallstones (GS) to prevent recurrent biliary events after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and CBDS extraction before elective cholecystectomy remains controversial. The aim of this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31523328 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1207 |
_version_ | 1783449623828889600 |
---|---|
author | Kawabata, Hideaki Kawakatsu, Yukino Yamaguchi, Katsutoshi Sone, Daiki Inoue, Naonori Ueda, Yuki Okazaki, Yuji Hitomi, Misuzu Miyata, Masatoshi Motoi, Shigehiro Fukuda, Kenichirou Shimizu, Yoshihiro |
author_facet | Kawabata, Hideaki Kawakatsu, Yukino Yamaguchi, Katsutoshi Sone, Daiki Inoue, Naonori Ueda, Yuki Okazaki, Yuji Hitomi, Misuzu Miyata, Masatoshi Motoi, Shigehiro Fukuda, Kenichirou Shimizu, Yoshihiro |
author_sort | Kawabata, Hideaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The usefulness of prophylactic biliary stenting for patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallstones (GS) to prevent recurrent biliary events after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and CBDS extraction before elective cholecystectomy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period and clarify its risk factors. METHODS: The clinical data of all patients who received prophylactic biliary stenting after EST for CBDS and later underwent cholecystectomy for GS followed by stent extraction in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The numbers of residual CBDS at the end first and second endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) studies were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to determine risk factors for recurrent CBDS in the perioperative period. RESULTS: Forty-two consecutive patients received prophylactic biliary stenting and subsequent cholecystectomy for GS. Three of these patients were excluded from this study because the number of residual stones was not confirmed. The median maximum CBDS diameter at second ERC was 0 mm (range, 0 - 10 mm); six patients had multiple CBDS (≥ 5). The number of CBDS at second ERC was increased in comparison to that at the first ERC in 15 patients (38.4%), and was unchanged or decreased in 24 patients. The median minimum cystic duct diameter was 4 mm (range, 1 - 8 mm). The median interval between first ERC and operation was 26 days (range, 2 - 131 days). The median interval between operation and second ERC was 41 days (range, 26 - 96 days). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed in 38 patients, one of whom was converted from LC to open cholecystectomy. Postoperative complications (transient bacteremia) occurred in one patient. The cystic duct diameter was an independent risk factor for an increased number of CBDS at second ERC in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.611 (95% confidence interval (0.398 - 0.939)), P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period of cholecystectomy is not a rare complication after EST and the removal of CBDS with concomitant GS. Prophylactic biliary stenting is considered useful for preventing CBDS-associated complications, especially for patients in whom the cystic duct diameter is larger (≥ 5 mm). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6731041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67310412019-09-13 Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones Kawabata, Hideaki Kawakatsu, Yukino Yamaguchi, Katsutoshi Sone, Daiki Inoue, Naonori Ueda, Yuki Okazaki, Yuji Hitomi, Misuzu Miyata, Masatoshi Motoi, Shigehiro Fukuda, Kenichirou Shimizu, Yoshihiro Gastroenterology Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The usefulness of prophylactic biliary stenting for patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallstones (GS) to prevent recurrent biliary events after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and CBDS extraction before elective cholecystectomy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period and clarify its risk factors. METHODS: The clinical data of all patients who received prophylactic biliary stenting after EST for CBDS and later underwent cholecystectomy for GS followed by stent extraction in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The numbers of residual CBDS at the end first and second endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) studies were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to determine risk factors for recurrent CBDS in the perioperative period. RESULTS: Forty-two consecutive patients received prophylactic biliary stenting and subsequent cholecystectomy for GS. Three of these patients were excluded from this study because the number of residual stones was not confirmed. The median maximum CBDS diameter at second ERC was 0 mm (range, 0 - 10 mm); six patients had multiple CBDS (≥ 5). The number of CBDS at second ERC was increased in comparison to that at the first ERC in 15 patients (38.4%), and was unchanged or decreased in 24 patients. The median minimum cystic duct diameter was 4 mm (range, 1 - 8 mm). The median interval between first ERC and operation was 26 days (range, 2 - 131 days). The median interval between operation and second ERC was 41 days (range, 26 - 96 days). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed in 38 patients, one of whom was converted from LC to open cholecystectomy. Postoperative complications (transient bacteremia) occurred in one patient. The cystic duct diameter was an independent risk factor for an increased number of CBDS at second ERC in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.611 (95% confidence interval (0.398 - 0.939)), P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period of cholecystectomy is not a rare complication after EST and the removal of CBDS with concomitant GS. Prophylactic biliary stenting is considered useful for preventing CBDS-associated complications, especially for patients in whom the cystic duct diameter is larger (≥ 5 mm). Elmer Press 2019-08 2019-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6731041/ /pubmed/31523328 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1207 Text en Copyright 2019, Kawabata et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kawabata, Hideaki Kawakatsu, Yukino Yamaguchi, Katsutoshi Sone, Daiki Inoue, Naonori Ueda, Yuki Okazaki, Yuji Hitomi, Misuzu Miyata, Masatoshi Motoi, Shigehiro Fukuda, Kenichirou Shimizu, Yoshihiro Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones |
title | Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones |
title_full | Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones |
title_fullStr | Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones |
title_full_unstemmed | Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones |
title_short | Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones |
title_sort | prophylactic biliary stenting before cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31523328 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawabatahideaki prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT kawakatsuyukino prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT yamaguchikatsutoshi prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT sonedaiki prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT inouenaonori prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT uedayuki prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT okazakiyuji prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT hitomimisuzu prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT miyatamasatoshi prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT motoishigehiro prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT fukudakenichirou prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones AT shimizuyoshihiro prophylacticbiliarystentingbeforecholecystectomyinpatientswithgallstonesandcommonbileductstones |