Cargando…

The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications

BACKGROUND: There is longstanding consensus on the need to include pregnant women in research. The goal of clinical research is to find highly regulated, carefully controlled, morally responsible ways to generate evidence about how to effectively and safely prevent illness or treat sick people. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kaye, Dan Kabonge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31492178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0081-8
_version_ 1783449698657370112
author Kaye, Dan Kabonge
author_facet Kaye, Dan Kabonge
author_sort Kaye, Dan Kabonge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is longstanding consensus on the need to include pregnant women in research. The goal of clinical research is to find highly regulated, carefully controlled, morally responsible ways to generate evidence about how to effectively and safely prevent illness or treat sick people. This manuscripts present a conceptual analysis of the ethicality of clinical trials in 3 scenarios: where the pregnant is involved in clinical trials as a participant during pregnancy for data that addresses pregnancy complications, where the pregnant woman consents to clinical trial participation for an unborn baby that has complications, to generate data on complications at this stage of life, and where the mother may consent for participation of their newborn child in clinical trials. METHODS: Conceptual analysis. FINDINGS: Investigators often choose to exclude pregnant women and newborns from research, even where there is possibility for them to benefit from the study intervention. Objections include vulnerability of pregnant women, altered pharmacokinetics and risk of adverse effects, with a need to balance potential maternal and fetal risks and benefits of research participation. While the objections may be valid, not performing research magnifies what should be a carefully controlled risk during research, pushing this risk into the clinical setting, and subsequently posing a challenge to clinicians who are faced with making treatment decisions for pregnant patients with limited evidence of efficacy and safety. The potential benefits of fair inclusion in clinical trials outweigh the potential risks. CONCLUSION: Research involving pregnant women is necessary to provide women with effective treatment during pregnancy, to promote fetal safety (such as by avoiding the clinical use of drugs that may be harmful to the developing fetus), and to reduce avoidable harm from suboptimal care (such as from underdosing) and to provide pregnant women, their fetuses and newborns (with access to potential benefits of research participation).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6731584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67315842019-09-12 The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications Kaye, Dan Kabonge Philos Ethics Humanit Med Review BACKGROUND: There is longstanding consensus on the need to include pregnant women in research. The goal of clinical research is to find highly regulated, carefully controlled, morally responsible ways to generate evidence about how to effectively and safely prevent illness or treat sick people. This manuscripts present a conceptual analysis of the ethicality of clinical trials in 3 scenarios: where the pregnant is involved in clinical trials as a participant during pregnancy for data that addresses pregnancy complications, where the pregnant woman consents to clinical trial participation for an unborn baby that has complications, to generate data on complications at this stage of life, and where the mother may consent for participation of their newborn child in clinical trials. METHODS: Conceptual analysis. FINDINGS: Investigators often choose to exclude pregnant women and newborns from research, even where there is possibility for them to benefit from the study intervention. Objections include vulnerability of pregnant women, altered pharmacokinetics and risk of adverse effects, with a need to balance potential maternal and fetal risks and benefits of research participation. While the objections may be valid, not performing research magnifies what should be a carefully controlled risk during research, pushing this risk into the clinical setting, and subsequently posing a challenge to clinicians who are faced with making treatment decisions for pregnant patients with limited evidence of efficacy and safety. The potential benefits of fair inclusion in clinical trials outweigh the potential risks. CONCLUSION: Research involving pregnant women is necessary to provide women with effective treatment during pregnancy, to promote fetal safety (such as by avoiding the clinical use of drugs that may be harmful to the developing fetus), and to reduce avoidable harm from suboptimal care (such as from underdosing) and to provide pregnant women, their fetuses and newborns (with access to potential benefits of research participation). BioMed Central 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6731584/ /pubmed/31492178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0081-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Kaye, Dan Kabonge
The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications
title The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications
title_full The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications
title_fullStr The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications
title_full_unstemmed The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications
title_short The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications
title_sort moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31492178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0081-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kayedankabonge themoralimperativetoapprovepregnantwomensparticipationinrandomizedclinicaltrialsforpregnancyandnewborncomplications
AT kayedankabonge moralimperativetoapprovepregnantwomensparticipationinrandomizedclinicaltrialsforpregnancyandnewborncomplications