Cargando…
Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Early identification of children with motor difficulties, such as developmental coordination disorder (DCD), is essential. At present only a fraction of children with DCD are identified. The purpose of the study was to systematically review the literature from 1994 to 2017 on observation...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31493795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6 |
_version_ | 1783449707232624640 |
---|---|
author | Asunta, P. Viholainen, H. Ahonen, T. Rintala, P. |
author_facet | Asunta, P. Viholainen, H. Ahonen, T. Rintala, P. |
author_sort | Asunta, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early identification of children with motor difficulties, such as developmental coordination disorder (DCD), is essential. At present only a fraction of children with DCD are identified. The purpose of the study was to systematically review the literature from 1994 to 2017 on observational screening tools and to evaluate the validity, reliability and usability of the questionnaires used. METHODS: The review of the literature was conducted to synthesize the data from five electronic databases for children aged 6–12 years. The following databases were searched: Academic search Elite (EBSCO), ERIC (ProQuest), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (ProQuest), and SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO). The studies meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed to assess the psychometric properties and feasibility of the measures. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 1907 potentially relevant publications. The final number of studies that met the inclusion criteria of our systematic review was 45. There were 11 questionnaires for parents, teachers and children. None of the questionnaires was valid for population-based screening as the only measurement tool. CONCLUSIONS: There are many challenges in using initial screening tools to identify children with motor difficulties. Nevertheless, many promising questionnaires are being developed that can provide information on functional skills and limitations across a variety of tasks and settings in the daily lives of children with DCD. The review provides much needed information about the current scales used in many clinical, educational and research settings. Implications for assessing psychometric properties of the developed questionnaires and further research are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42018087532. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6731620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67316202019-09-12 Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review Asunta, P. Viholainen, H. Ahonen, T. Rintala, P. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Early identification of children with motor difficulties, such as developmental coordination disorder (DCD), is essential. At present only a fraction of children with DCD are identified. The purpose of the study was to systematically review the literature from 1994 to 2017 on observational screening tools and to evaluate the validity, reliability and usability of the questionnaires used. METHODS: The review of the literature was conducted to synthesize the data from five electronic databases for children aged 6–12 years. The following databases were searched: Academic search Elite (EBSCO), ERIC (ProQuest), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (ProQuest), and SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO). The studies meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed to assess the psychometric properties and feasibility of the measures. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 1907 potentially relevant publications. The final number of studies that met the inclusion criteria of our systematic review was 45. There were 11 questionnaires for parents, teachers and children. None of the questionnaires was valid for population-based screening as the only measurement tool. CONCLUSIONS: There are many challenges in using initial screening tools to identify children with motor difficulties. Nevertheless, many promising questionnaires are being developed that can provide information on functional skills and limitations across a variety of tasks and settings in the daily lives of children with DCD. The review provides much needed information about the current scales used in many clinical, educational and research settings. Implications for assessing psychometric properties of the developed questionnaires and further research are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42018087532. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6731620/ /pubmed/31493795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Asunta, P. Viholainen, H. Ahonen, T. Rintala, P. Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review |
title | Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review |
title_full | Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review |
title_short | Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review |
title_sort | psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31493795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asuntap psychometricpropertiesofobservationaltoolsforidentifyingmotordifficultiesasystematicreview AT viholainenh psychometricpropertiesofobservationaltoolsforidentifyingmotordifficultiesasystematicreview AT ahonent psychometricpropertiesofobservationaltoolsforidentifyingmotordifficultiesasystematicreview AT rintalap psychometricpropertiesofobservationaltoolsforidentifyingmotordifficultiesasystematicreview |