Cargando…
How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Community-based Participatory Women’s Groups (PWGs) have proven to be an effective intervention to improve maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Less is known about how PWGs exert their effects in LMICs and virtually nothing is known about the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31492787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030461 |
_version_ | 1783449730690318336 |
---|---|
author | Preston, Robyn Rannard, Sam Felton-Busch, Catrina Larkins, Sarah Canuto, Karla Carlisle, Karen Evans, Rebecca Redman-MacLaren, Michelle Taylor, Judy Turner, Nalita Nungarrayi Yeomans, Lee Sanguineti, Emma Passey, Megan Farmer, Jane |
author_facet | Preston, Robyn Rannard, Sam Felton-Busch, Catrina Larkins, Sarah Canuto, Karla Carlisle, Karen Evans, Rebecca Redman-MacLaren, Michelle Taylor, Judy Turner, Nalita Nungarrayi Yeomans, Lee Sanguineti, Emma Passey, Megan Farmer, Jane |
author_sort | Preston, Robyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Community-based Participatory Women’s Groups (PWGs) have proven to be an effective intervention to improve maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Less is known about how PWGs exert their effects in LMICs and virtually nothing is known about the contextual issues, processes and power relationships that affect PWG outcomes in high resource settings. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise and critically analyse the current evidence on how and why PWGs improve the quality of MCH care. We aim to demonstrate how PWGs function and why PWG interventions contribute to social and health outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. The databases Medline (Ovid): Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Ebsco); Informit health suite Scopus, Australian HealthInfoNet, the Cochrane Library and other sources will be searched under broad categories: intervention, context and outcomes to 30 June 2019. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As only secondary data will be analysed; ethical approval is not required. The review will be disseminated to relevant organisations and presented in peer-reviewed papers and at conferences. This will be the first attempt to summarise the current available evidence on the characteristics, contextual influences and mechanisms that are associated with the outcomes and effectiveness of PWGs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019126533. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6731784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67317842019-09-20 How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol Preston, Robyn Rannard, Sam Felton-Busch, Catrina Larkins, Sarah Canuto, Karla Carlisle, Karen Evans, Rebecca Redman-MacLaren, Michelle Taylor, Judy Turner, Nalita Nungarrayi Yeomans, Lee Sanguineti, Emma Passey, Megan Farmer, Jane BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Community-based Participatory Women’s Groups (PWGs) have proven to be an effective intervention to improve maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Less is known about how PWGs exert their effects in LMICs and virtually nothing is known about the contextual issues, processes and power relationships that affect PWG outcomes in high resource settings. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise and critically analyse the current evidence on how and why PWGs improve the quality of MCH care. We aim to demonstrate how PWGs function and why PWG interventions contribute to social and health outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. The databases Medline (Ovid): Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Ebsco); Informit health suite Scopus, Australian HealthInfoNet, the Cochrane Library and other sources will be searched under broad categories: intervention, context and outcomes to 30 June 2019. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As only secondary data will be analysed; ethical approval is not required. The review will be disseminated to relevant organisations and presented in peer-reviewed papers and at conferences. This will be the first attempt to summarise the current available evidence on the characteristics, contextual influences and mechanisms that are associated with the outcomes and effectiveness of PWGs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019126533. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6731784/ /pubmed/31492787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030461 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Preston, Robyn Rannard, Sam Felton-Busch, Catrina Larkins, Sarah Canuto, Karla Carlisle, Karen Evans, Rebecca Redman-MacLaren, Michelle Taylor, Judy Turner, Nalita Nungarrayi Yeomans, Lee Sanguineti, Emma Passey, Megan Farmer, Jane How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol |
title | How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol |
title_full | How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol |
title_short | How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol |
title_sort | how and why do participatory women’s groups (pwgs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (mch) care? a systematic review protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31492787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prestonrobyn howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT rannardsam howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT feltonbuschcatrina howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT larkinssarah howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT canutokarla howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT carlislekaren howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT evansrebecca howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT redmanmaclarenmichelle howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT taylorjudy howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT turnernalitanungarrayi howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT yeomanslee howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT sanguinetiemma howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT passeymegan howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol AT farmerjane howandwhydoparticipatorywomensgroupspwgsimprovethequalityofmaternalandchildhealthmchcareasystematicreviewprotocol |