Cargando…

Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Identifying research gaps can inform the design and conduct of health research, practice and policies by informing the current body of evidence. Audiences including researchers, clinical guideline developers, clinicians, policymakers, research regulatory bodies, funders and patients/th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyanchoka, Linda, Tudur-Smith, Catrin, Porcher, Raphaël, Hren, Darko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027926
_version_ 1783449747788398592
author Nyanchoka, Linda
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
Porcher, Raphaël
Hren, Darko
author_facet Nyanchoka, Linda
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
Porcher, Raphaël
Hren, Darko
author_sort Nyanchoka, Linda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Identifying research gaps can inform the design and conduct of health research, practice and policies by informing the current body of evidence. Audiences including researchers, clinical guideline developers, clinicians, policymakers, research regulatory bodies, funders and patients/the public can also benefit from understanding the status of research and research gaps to make informed choices. This study aims to explore how key informants define research gaps and characterise methods/practices used to identify and display gaps in health research to inform future research practice and policies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews. The participants will be recruited by purposive sampling from initiatives and organisations previously identified in a scoping review on methods to identify, prioritise and display gaps in health research. We anticipate performing up to 28 interviews with the different key informant groups who are involved in using evidence to inform health policy, practice and research. Interviews will be thematically analysed as outlined by Braun and Clarke. The qualitative data-analysis software NVivo V.12 Pro will be used to aid data management and analysis. DISCUSSION: This is the protocol for a follow-up study that aims to complement and enrich the findings of the scoping review on methods to identify, prioritise and display gaps in health research. The overall project aims to develop methodological guidance for describing, identifying and displaying gaps in health research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research obtained ethical approval from the University of Liverpool, UK. The findings will be disseminated via conferences, meetings (organised by the Methods in Research on Research project), peer-reviewed publications and lay magazines because the study participants will include the public/patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6731867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67318672019-09-20 Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol Nyanchoka, Linda Tudur-Smith, Catrin Porcher, Raphaël Hren, Darko BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: Identifying research gaps can inform the design and conduct of health research, practice and policies by informing the current body of evidence. Audiences including researchers, clinical guideline developers, clinicians, policymakers, research regulatory bodies, funders and patients/the public can also benefit from understanding the status of research and research gaps to make informed choices. This study aims to explore how key informants define research gaps and characterise methods/practices used to identify and display gaps in health research to inform future research practice and policies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews. The participants will be recruited by purposive sampling from initiatives and organisations previously identified in a scoping review on methods to identify, prioritise and display gaps in health research. We anticipate performing up to 28 interviews with the different key informant groups who are involved in using evidence to inform health policy, practice and research. Interviews will be thematically analysed as outlined by Braun and Clarke. The qualitative data-analysis software NVivo V.12 Pro will be used to aid data management and analysis. DISCUSSION: This is the protocol for a follow-up study that aims to complement and enrich the findings of the scoping review on methods to identify, prioritise and display gaps in health research. The overall project aims to develop methodological guidance for describing, identifying and displaying gaps in health research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research obtained ethical approval from the University of Liverpool, UK. The findings will be disseminated via conferences, meetings (organised by the Methods in Research on Research project), peer-reviewed publications and lay magazines because the study participants will include the public/patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6731867/ /pubmed/31481368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027926 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Nyanchoka, Linda
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
Porcher, Raphaël
Hren, Darko
Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol
title Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol
title_full Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol
title_fullStr Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol
title_short Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol
title_sort key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study protocol
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027926
work_keys_str_mv AT nyanchokalinda keystakeholdersperspectivesandexperienceswithdefiningidentifyinganddisplayinggapsinhealthresearchaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT tudursmithcatrin keystakeholdersperspectivesandexperienceswithdefiningidentifyinganddisplayinggapsinhealthresearchaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT porcherraphael keystakeholdersperspectivesandexperienceswithdefiningidentifyinganddisplayinggapsinhealthresearchaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT hrendarko keystakeholdersperspectivesandexperienceswithdefiningidentifyinganddisplayinggapsinhealthresearchaqualitativestudyprotocol