Cargando…

Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies

OBJECTIVE: To carry out a systematic review of the psychometric properties of international studies that have used the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC). DESIGN: Literature review and an analysis framework to review studies. SETTING: Hospitals and other healthcare settings in North a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waterson, Patrick, Carman, Eva-Maria, Manser, Tanja, Hammer, Antje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896
_version_ 1783449752472387584
author Waterson, Patrick
Carman, Eva-Maria
Manser, Tanja
Hammer, Antje
author_facet Waterson, Patrick
Carman, Eva-Maria
Manser, Tanja
Hammer, Antje
author_sort Waterson, Patrick
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To carry out a systematic review of the psychometric properties of international studies that have used the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC). DESIGN: Literature review and an analysis framework to review studies. SETTING: Hospitals and other healthcare settings in North and South America, Europe, the Near East, the Middle East and the Far East. DATA SOURCES: A total of 62 studies and 67 datasets made up of journal papers, book chapters and PhD theses were included in the review. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric properties (eg, internal consistency) and sample characteristics (eg, country of use, participant job roles and changes made to the original version of the HSPSC). RESULTS: Just over half (52%) of the studies in our sample reported internal reliabilities lower than 0.7 for at least six HSPSC dimensions. The dimensions ‘staffing’, ‘communication openness’, ‘non-punitive response to error’, ‘organisational learning’ and ‘overall perceptions of safety’ resulted in low internal consistencies in a majority of studies. The outcomes from assessing construct validity were reported in 60% of the studies. Most studies took place in a hospital setting (84%); the majority of survey participants (62%) were drawn from nursing and technical staff. Forty-two per cent of the studies did not state what modifications, if any, were made to the original US version of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: While there is evidence of a growing worldwide trend in the use of the HSPSC, particularly within Europe and the Near/Middle East, our review underlines the need for caution in using the instrument. Future use of the HSPSC needs to be sensitive to the demands of care settings, the target population and other aspects of the national and local healthcare contexts. There is a need to develop guidelines covering procedures for using, adapting and translating the HSPSC, as well as reporting findings based on its use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6731893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67318932019-09-20 Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies Waterson, Patrick Carman, Eva-Maria Manser, Tanja Hammer, Antje BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To carry out a systematic review of the psychometric properties of international studies that have used the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC). DESIGN: Literature review and an analysis framework to review studies. SETTING: Hospitals and other healthcare settings in North and South America, Europe, the Near East, the Middle East and the Far East. DATA SOURCES: A total of 62 studies and 67 datasets made up of journal papers, book chapters and PhD theses were included in the review. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric properties (eg, internal consistency) and sample characteristics (eg, country of use, participant job roles and changes made to the original version of the HSPSC). RESULTS: Just over half (52%) of the studies in our sample reported internal reliabilities lower than 0.7 for at least six HSPSC dimensions. The dimensions ‘staffing’, ‘communication openness’, ‘non-punitive response to error’, ‘organisational learning’ and ‘overall perceptions of safety’ resulted in low internal consistencies in a majority of studies. The outcomes from assessing construct validity were reported in 60% of the studies. Most studies took place in a hospital setting (84%); the majority of survey participants (62%) were drawn from nursing and technical staff. Forty-two per cent of the studies did not state what modifications, if any, were made to the original US version of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: While there is evidence of a growing worldwide trend in the use of the HSPSC, particularly within Europe and the Near/Middle East, our review underlines the need for caution in using the instrument. Future use of the HSPSC needs to be sensitive to the demands of care settings, the target population and other aspects of the national and local healthcare contexts. There is a need to develop guidelines covering procedures for using, adapting and translating the HSPSC, as well as reporting findings based on its use. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6731893/ /pubmed/31488465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Waterson, Patrick
Carman, Eva-Maria
Manser, Tanja
Hammer, Antje
Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies
title Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies
title_full Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies
title_fullStr Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies
title_full_unstemmed Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies
title_short Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies
title_sort hospital survey on patient safety culture (hspsc): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896
work_keys_str_mv AT watersonpatrick hospitalsurveyonpatientsafetyculturehspscasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesof62internationalstudies
AT carmanevamaria hospitalsurveyonpatientsafetyculturehspscasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesof62internationalstudies
AT mansertanja hospitalsurveyonpatientsafetyculturehspscasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesof62internationalstudies
AT hammerantje hospitalsurveyonpatientsafetyculturehspscasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesof62internationalstudies