Cargando…

Selective reporting bias in randomised controlled trials from two network meta-analyses: comparison of clinical trial registrations and their respective publications

OBJECTIVE: To determine (i) the difference in the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in trial registrations and their respective primary publications and (ii) the effect of adding SAE data from registries to a network meta-analysis (NMA) in changing the surface under the cumulative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Wong, Eric KC, Lachance, Chantelle C, Page, Matthew J, Watt, Jennifer, Veroniki, Areti, Straus, Sharon E, Tricco, Andrea C
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:	Research Methods
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31492792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031138

Ejemplares similares

Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
por: Watt, Jennifer A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Watt, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Does type of funding affect reporting in network meta-analysis? A scoping review of network meta-analyses
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Biases arising from linked administrative data for epidemiological research: a conceptual framework from registration to analyses
por: Shaw, Richard J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Safety and effectiveness of long-acting versus intermediate-acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Trial registration and time to publication in a retrospective cohort of publicly funded randomised controlled trials in New Zealand 1999–2017
por: Jull, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

To condition or not condition? Analysing ‘change’ in longitudinal randomised controlled trials
por: Coffman, Cynthia J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Risk of bias and reporting completeness of randomised controlled trials in burn care: protocol for a systematic review
por: Young, Amber, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Safety of pharmacologic interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Watt, Jennifer A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not
por: Bell, Melanie L, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Exploring the prevalence of gaming disorder and Internet gaming disorder: a rapid scoping review
por: Darvesh, Nazia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Watt, Jennifer A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of herpes zoster vaccines in adults aged 50 and older: systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: a systematic review of registration details
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Compliant flooring to prevent fall-related injuries: a scoping review protocol
por: Lachance, Chantelle C, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses
por: Coscia, Claudia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Disclosure of researcher allegiance in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy: a systematic appraisal
por: Dragioti, Elena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Systematic bias between blinded independent central review and local assessment: literature review and analyses of 76 phase III randomised controlled trials in 45 688 patients with advanced solid tumour
por: Zhang, Jianrong, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Target parameters and bias in non-causal change-score analyses with measurement errors
por: Sjölander, Arvid, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Methodological review to develop a list of bias items used to assess reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: protocol and rationale
por: Lunny, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prospective registration, bias risk and outcome-reporting bias in randomised clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine: an empirical methodological study
por: Liu, Jian-Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review
por: Zarin, Wasifa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Erratum to: Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review
por: Zarin, Wasifa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Protocol for a scoping review of post-trial extensions of randomised controlled trials using individually linked administrative and registry data
por: Fitzpatrick, Tiffany, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Paule‐Mandel estimators for network meta‐analysis with random inconsistency effects
por: Jackson, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses
Publicado: (2023)

Comparative safety and effectiveness of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer's dementia: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis
por: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The role of pragmatism in explaining heterogeneity in meta-analyses of randomised trials: a protocol for a cross-sectional methodological review
por: Aves, Theresa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Registry randomised trials: a methodological perspective
por: Doherty, Dorota A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
por: Kahan, Brennan C., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Resolutions of Respect—Massachusetts Board of Registration in Dentistry
Publicado: (1898)

Massachusetts Board of Registration in Dentistry—Resolutions of Respect
Publicado: (1903)

Intention-to-treat analyses and missing data approaches in pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol use disorders
por: Del Re, A C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_fq2peepfi5k60f6u0vlr28d36s