Cargando…
Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review
OBJECTIVES: For many people with advanced osteoarthritis, total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective treatment for relieving pain and improving function. Features of perioperative care may be associated with the adverse event of chronic pain 6 months or longer after surgery; effects may be direct,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028093 |
_version_ | 1783449753961365504 |
---|---|
author | Beswick, Andrew David Dennis, Jane Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Blom, Ashley William Wylde, Vikki |
author_facet | Beswick, Andrew David Dennis, Jane Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Blom, Ashley William Wylde, Vikki |
author_sort | Beswick, Andrew David |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: For many people with advanced osteoarthritis, total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective treatment for relieving pain and improving function. Features of perioperative care may be associated with the adverse event of chronic pain 6 months or longer after surgery; effects may be direct, for example, through nerve damage or surgical complications, or indirect through adverse events. This systematic review aims to evaluate whether non-surgical perioperative interventions prevent long-term pain after TKR. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of perioperative interventions for adults with osteoarthritis receiving primary TKR evaluated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL until February 2018. After screening, two reviewers evaluated articles. Studies at low risk of bias according to the Cochrane tool were included. INTERVENTIONS: Perioperative non-surgical interventions; control receiving no intervention or alternative treatment. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain or score with pain component assessed at 6 months or longer postoperative. RESULTS: 44 RCTs at low risk of bias assessed long-term pain. Intervention heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and definitive statements on effectiveness. Good-quality research provided generally weak evidence for small reductions in long-term pain with local infiltration analgesia (three studies), ketamine infusion (one study), pregabalin (one study) and supported early discharge (one study) compared with no intervention. For electric muscle stimulation (two studies), anabolic steroids (one study) and walking training (one study) there was a suggestion of more clinically important benefit. No concerns relating to long-term adverse events were reported. For a range of treatments there was no evidence linking them with unfavourable pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: To prevent chronic pain after TKR, several perioperative interventions show benefits and merit further research. Good-quality studies assessing long-term pain after perioperative interventions are feasible and necessary to ensure that patients with osteoarthritis achieve good long-term outcomes after TKR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6731899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67318992019-09-20 Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review Beswick, Andrew David Dennis, Jane Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Blom, Ashley William Wylde, Vikki BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: For many people with advanced osteoarthritis, total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective treatment for relieving pain and improving function. Features of perioperative care may be associated with the adverse event of chronic pain 6 months or longer after surgery; effects may be direct, for example, through nerve damage or surgical complications, or indirect through adverse events. This systematic review aims to evaluate whether non-surgical perioperative interventions prevent long-term pain after TKR. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of perioperative interventions for adults with osteoarthritis receiving primary TKR evaluated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL until February 2018. After screening, two reviewers evaluated articles. Studies at low risk of bias according to the Cochrane tool were included. INTERVENTIONS: Perioperative non-surgical interventions; control receiving no intervention or alternative treatment. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain or score with pain component assessed at 6 months or longer postoperative. RESULTS: 44 RCTs at low risk of bias assessed long-term pain. Intervention heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and definitive statements on effectiveness. Good-quality research provided generally weak evidence for small reductions in long-term pain with local infiltration analgesia (three studies), ketamine infusion (one study), pregabalin (one study) and supported early discharge (one study) compared with no intervention. For electric muscle stimulation (two studies), anabolic steroids (one study) and walking training (one study) there was a suggestion of more clinically important benefit. No concerns relating to long-term adverse events were reported. For a range of treatments there was no evidence linking them with unfavourable pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: To prevent chronic pain after TKR, several perioperative interventions show benefits and merit further research. Good-quality studies assessing long-term pain after perioperative interventions are feasible and necessary to ensure that patients with osteoarthritis achieve good long-term outcomes after TKR. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6731899/ /pubmed/31494601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028093 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Beswick, Andrew David Dennis, Jane Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Blom, Ashley William Wylde, Vikki Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title | Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_full | Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_short | Are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_sort | are perioperative interventions effective in preventing chronic pain after primary total knee replacement? a systematic review |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beswickandrewdavid areperioperativeinterventionseffectiveinpreventingchronicpainafterprimarytotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT dennisjane areperioperativeinterventionseffectiveinpreventingchronicpainafterprimarytotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT goobermanhillrachael areperioperativeinterventionseffectiveinpreventingchronicpainafterprimarytotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT blomashleywilliam areperioperativeinterventionseffectiveinpreventingchronicpainafterprimarytotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT wyldevikki areperioperativeinterventionseffectiveinpreventingchronicpainafterprimarytotalkneereplacementasystematicreview |