Cargando…

Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Musculoskeletal care pathways are variable and inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for the clinical and/or cost effectiveness of current care pathways for adults with hip and/or knee pain referred for specialist opinion. DESIGN: Systematic review....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Button, Kate, Morgan, Fiona, Weightman, Alison Lesley, Jones, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027874
_version_ 1783449754950172672
author Button, Kate
Morgan, Fiona
Weightman, Alison Lesley
Jones, Stephen
author_facet Button, Kate
Morgan, Fiona
Weightman, Alison Lesley
Jones, Stephen
author_sort Button, Kate
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Musculoskeletal care pathways are variable and inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for the clinical and/or cost effectiveness of current care pathways for adults with hip and/or knee pain referred for specialist opinion. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic database searches were carried out in MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, PEDro, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central and Health Management Information Consortium without language restriction from 1990 onwards. Websites were reviewed for grey literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All study designs and documents that considered care pathways for adults with musculoskeletal hip and/or knee pain referred for specialist opinion were screened by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for randomised controlled trials and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. Findings are reported narratively. RESULTS: The titles and abstracts of 1248 articles were screened and 140 full-text articles retrieved. 19 papers reporting 17 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Quality was low due to study design and methodological flaws. Most of the outcomes relate to organisational process at the ‘meso’ level of a whole systems approach. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the pathway is not linear, containing variations and activity loops. The available evidence suggests that, from the point of referral for specialist opinion, a model is required that integrates the skills of all the different healthcare professionals and streamlining is required to ensure that individuals are seen by the healthcare professional that best meets their needs. There is very limited evidence of patient experience informing knee and hip care pathways. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016035510.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6731906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67319062019-09-20 Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review Button, Kate Morgan, Fiona Weightman, Alison Lesley Jones, Stephen BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Musculoskeletal care pathways are variable and inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for the clinical and/or cost effectiveness of current care pathways for adults with hip and/or knee pain referred for specialist opinion. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic database searches were carried out in MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, PEDro, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central and Health Management Information Consortium without language restriction from 1990 onwards. Websites were reviewed for grey literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All study designs and documents that considered care pathways for adults with musculoskeletal hip and/or knee pain referred for specialist opinion were screened by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for randomised controlled trials and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. Findings are reported narratively. RESULTS: The titles and abstracts of 1248 articles were screened and 140 full-text articles retrieved. 19 papers reporting 17 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Quality was low due to study design and methodological flaws. Most of the outcomes relate to organisational process at the ‘meso’ level of a whole systems approach. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the pathway is not linear, containing variations and activity loops. The available evidence suggests that, from the point of referral for specialist opinion, a model is required that integrates the skills of all the different healthcare professionals and streamlining is required to ensure that individuals are seen by the healthcare professional that best meets their needs. There is very limited evidence of patient experience informing knee and hip care pathways. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016035510. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6731906/ /pubmed/31488471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027874 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Button, Kate
Morgan, Fiona
Weightman, Alison Lesley
Jones, Stephen
Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review
title Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review
title_full Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review
title_fullStr Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review
title_short Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review
title_sort musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027874
work_keys_str_mv AT buttonkate musculoskeletalcarepathwaysforadultswithhipandkneepainreferredforspecialistopinionasystematicreview
AT morganfiona musculoskeletalcarepathwaysforadultswithhipandkneepainreferredforspecialistopinionasystematicreview
AT weightmanalisonlesley musculoskeletalcarepathwaysforadultswithhipandkneepainreferredforspecialistopinionasystematicreview
AT jonesstephen musculoskeletalcarepathwaysforadultswithhipandkneepainreferredforspecialistopinionasystematicreview