Cargando…

The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction

Emulation of natural disturbances is often regarded as a key measure to make forestry biodiversity-oriented. Consequently, extraction of logging residues is assumed to have little negative effect in comparison to extraction of dead wood mainly formed at natural disturbances. This is consistent with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranius, Thomas, Hämäläinen, Aino, Sjögren, Jörgen, Hiron, Matthew, Jonason, Dennis, Kubart, Ariana, Schroeder, Martin, Dahlberg, Anders, Thor, Göran, Jonsell, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2
_version_ 1783449775218098176
author Ranius, Thomas
Hämäläinen, Aino
Sjögren, Jörgen
Hiron, Matthew
Jonason, Dennis
Kubart, Ariana
Schroeder, Martin
Dahlberg, Anders
Thor, Göran
Jonsell, Mats
author_facet Ranius, Thomas
Hämäläinen, Aino
Sjögren, Jörgen
Hiron, Matthew
Jonason, Dennis
Kubart, Ariana
Schroeder, Martin
Dahlberg, Anders
Thor, Göran
Jonsell, Mats
author_sort Ranius, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Emulation of natural disturbances is often regarded as a key measure to make forestry biodiversity-oriented. Consequently, extraction of logging residues is assumed to have little negative effect in comparison to extraction of dead wood mainly formed at natural disturbances. This is consistent with the evolutionary species pool hypothesis, which suggests that most species are evolutionary adapted to the naturally most abundant habitats. We tested this hypothesis for dead-wood-dependent macrofungi, lichens, and beetles in a boreal forest landscape in central Sweden, assuming that species are adapted to conditions similar to today’s unmanaged forest. No occurrence patterns, for the species groups which we investigated, were consistent with the hypothesis. Overall, stumps and snags had the highest habitat quality (measured as average population density with equal weight given to each species) and fine woody debris the lowest, which was unexpected, since stumps were the rarest dead-wood type in unmanaged forest. We conclude that the evolutionary species pool concept did not explain patterns of species’ occurrences, and for two reasons, the concept is not reliable as a general rule of thumb: (1) what constitute habitats harbouring different species communities can only be understood from habitat-specific studies and (2) the suitability of habitats is affected by their biophysical characteristics. Thus, emulation of natural disturbances may promote biodiversity, but empirical studies are needed for each habitat to understand how natural disturbances should be emulated. We also conclude that stump extraction for bioenergy is associated with larger risks for biodiversity than fine woody debris extraction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6732131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67321312019-09-20 The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction Ranius, Thomas Hämäläinen, Aino Sjögren, Jörgen Hiron, Matthew Jonason, Dennis Kubart, Ariana Schroeder, Martin Dahlberg, Anders Thor, Göran Jonsell, Mats Oecologia Conservation Ecology–Original Research Emulation of natural disturbances is often regarded as a key measure to make forestry biodiversity-oriented. Consequently, extraction of logging residues is assumed to have little negative effect in comparison to extraction of dead wood mainly formed at natural disturbances. This is consistent with the evolutionary species pool hypothesis, which suggests that most species are evolutionary adapted to the naturally most abundant habitats. We tested this hypothesis for dead-wood-dependent macrofungi, lichens, and beetles in a boreal forest landscape in central Sweden, assuming that species are adapted to conditions similar to today’s unmanaged forest. No occurrence patterns, for the species groups which we investigated, were consistent with the hypothesis. Overall, stumps and snags had the highest habitat quality (measured as average population density with equal weight given to each species) and fine woody debris the lowest, which was unexpected, since stumps were the rarest dead-wood type in unmanaged forest. We conclude that the evolutionary species pool concept did not explain patterns of species’ occurrences, and for two reasons, the concept is not reliable as a general rule of thumb: (1) what constitute habitats harbouring different species communities can only be understood from habitat-specific studies and (2) the suitability of habitats is affected by their biophysical characteristics. Thus, emulation of natural disturbances may promote biodiversity, but empirical studies are needed for each habitat to understand how natural disturbances should be emulated. We also conclude that stump extraction for bioenergy is associated with larger risks for biodiversity than fine woody debris extraction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-07-27 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6732131/ /pubmed/31352635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Conservation Ecology–Original Research
Ranius, Thomas
Hämäläinen, Aino
Sjögren, Jörgen
Hiron, Matthew
Jonason, Dennis
Kubart, Ariana
Schroeder, Martin
Dahlberg, Anders
Thor, Göran
Jonsell, Mats
The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction
title The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction
title_full The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction
title_fullStr The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction
title_full_unstemmed The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction
title_short The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction
title_sort evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction
topic Conservation Ecology–Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2
work_keys_str_mv AT raniusthomas theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT hamalainenaino theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT sjogrenjorgen theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT hironmatthew theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT jonasondennis theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT kubartariana theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT schroedermartin theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT dahlberganders theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT thorgoran theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT jonsellmats theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT raniusthomas evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT hamalainenaino evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT sjogrenjorgen evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT hironmatthew evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT jonasondennis evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT kubartariana evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT schroedermartin evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT dahlberganders evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT thorgoran evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction
AT jonsellmats evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction