Cargando…
The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction
Emulation of natural disturbances is often regarded as a key measure to make forestry biodiversity-oriented. Consequently, extraction of logging residues is assumed to have little negative effect in comparison to extraction of dead wood mainly formed at natural disturbances. This is consistent with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2 |
_version_ | 1783449775218098176 |
---|---|
author | Ranius, Thomas Hämäläinen, Aino Sjögren, Jörgen Hiron, Matthew Jonason, Dennis Kubart, Ariana Schroeder, Martin Dahlberg, Anders Thor, Göran Jonsell, Mats |
author_facet | Ranius, Thomas Hämäläinen, Aino Sjögren, Jörgen Hiron, Matthew Jonason, Dennis Kubart, Ariana Schroeder, Martin Dahlberg, Anders Thor, Göran Jonsell, Mats |
author_sort | Ranius, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emulation of natural disturbances is often regarded as a key measure to make forestry biodiversity-oriented. Consequently, extraction of logging residues is assumed to have little negative effect in comparison to extraction of dead wood mainly formed at natural disturbances. This is consistent with the evolutionary species pool hypothesis, which suggests that most species are evolutionary adapted to the naturally most abundant habitats. We tested this hypothesis for dead-wood-dependent macrofungi, lichens, and beetles in a boreal forest landscape in central Sweden, assuming that species are adapted to conditions similar to today’s unmanaged forest. No occurrence patterns, for the species groups which we investigated, were consistent with the hypothesis. Overall, stumps and snags had the highest habitat quality (measured as average population density with equal weight given to each species) and fine woody debris the lowest, which was unexpected, since stumps were the rarest dead-wood type in unmanaged forest. We conclude that the evolutionary species pool concept did not explain patterns of species’ occurrences, and for two reasons, the concept is not reliable as a general rule of thumb: (1) what constitute habitats harbouring different species communities can only be understood from habitat-specific studies and (2) the suitability of habitats is affected by their biophysical characteristics. Thus, emulation of natural disturbances may promote biodiversity, but empirical studies are needed for each habitat to understand how natural disturbances should be emulated. We also conclude that stump extraction for bioenergy is associated with larger risks for biodiversity than fine woody debris extraction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6732131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67321312019-09-20 The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction Ranius, Thomas Hämäläinen, Aino Sjögren, Jörgen Hiron, Matthew Jonason, Dennis Kubart, Ariana Schroeder, Martin Dahlberg, Anders Thor, Göran Jonsell, Mats Oecologia Conservation Ecology–Original Research Emulation of natural disturbances is often regarded as a key measure to make forestry biodiversity-oriented. Consequently, extraction of logging residues is assumed to have little negative effect in comparison to extraction of dead wood mainly formed at natural disturbances. This is consistent with the evolutionary species pool hypothesis, which suggests that most species are evolutionary adapted to the naturally most abundant habitats. We tested this hypothesis for dead-wood-dependent macrofungi, lichens, and beetles in a boreal forest landscape in central Sweden, assuming that species are adapted to conditions similar to today’s unmanaged forest. No occurrence patterns, for the species groups which we investigated, were consistent with the hypothesis. Overall, stumps and snags had the highest habitat quality (measured as average population density with equal weight given to each species) and fine woody debris the lowest, which was unexpected, since stumps were the rarest dead-wood type in unmanaged forest. We conclude that the evolutionary species pool concept did not explain patterns of species’ occurrences, and for two reasons, the concept is not reliable as a general rule of thumb: (1) what constitute habitats harbouring different species communities can only be understood from habitat-specific studies and (2) the suitability of habitats is affected by their biophysical characteristics. Thus, emulation of natural disturbances may promote biodiversity, but empirical studies are needed for each habitat to understand how natural disturbances should be emulated. We also conclude that stump extraction for bioenergy is associated with larger risks for biodiversity than fine woody debris extraction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-07-27 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6732131/ /pubmed/31352635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Conservation Ecology–Original Research Ranius, Thomas Hämäläinen, Aino Sjögren, Jörgen Hiron, Matthew Jonason, Dennis Kubart, Ariana Schroeder, Martin Dahlberg, Anders Thor, Göran Jonsell, Mats The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction |
title | The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction |
title_full | The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction |
title_fullStr | The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction |
title_full_unstemmed | The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction |
title_short | The evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction |
title_sort | evolutionary species pool concept does not explain occurrence patterns of dead-wood-dependent organisms: implications for logging residue extraction |
topic | Conservation Ecology–Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04473-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raniusthomas theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT hamalainenaino theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT sjogrenjorgen theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT hironmatthew theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT jonasondennis theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT kubartariana theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT schroedermartin theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT dahlberganders theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT thorgoran theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT jonsellmats theevolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT raniusthomas evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT hamalainenaino evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT sjogrenjorgen evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT hironmatthew evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT jonasondennis evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT kubartariana evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT schroedermartin evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT dahlberganders evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT thorgoran evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction AT jonsellmats evolutionaryspeciespoolconceptdoesnotexplainoccurrencepatternsofdeadwooddependentorganismsimplicationsforloggingresidueextraction |