Cargando…

Implementation and Effectiveness of a Bar Code–Based Transfusion Management System for Transfusion Safety in a Tertiary Hospital: Retrospective Quality Improvement Study

BACKGROUND: Large-scale and long-term studies are not sufficient to determine the efficiency that IT solutions can bring to transfusion safety. OBJECTIVE: This quality-improvement report describes our continuous efforts to implement and upgrade a bar code–based transfusion management (BCTM) system s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chou, Shin-Shang, Chen, Ying-Ju, Shen, Yu-Te, Yen, Hsiu-Fang, Kuo, Shu-Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31452517
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14192
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Large-scale and long-term studies are not sufficient to determine the efficiency that IT solutions can bring to transfusion safety. OBJECTIVE: This quality-improvement report describes our continuous efforts to implement and upgrade a bar code–based transfusion management (BCTM) system since 2011 and examines its effectiveness and sustainability in reducing blood transfusion errors, in a 3000-bed tertiary hospital, where more than 60,000 prescriptions of blood transfusion are covered by 2500 nurses each year. METHODS: The BCTM system uses barcodes for patient identification, onsite labeling, and blood product verification, through wireless connection to the hospital information systems. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were used to improve the process. Process maps before and after implementation of the BCTM system in 2011 were drawn to highlight the changes. The numbers of incorrect labeling or wrong blood in tube incidents that occurred quarterly were plotted on a run chart to monitor the quality changes of each intervention introduced. The annual occurrences of error events from 2011 to 2017 were compared with the mean occurrence of 2008-2010 to determine whether implementation of the BCTM system could effectively reduce the number of errors in 2016 and whether this reduction could persist in 2017. RESULTS: The error rate decreased from 0.03% in 2008-2010 to 0.002% in 2016 (P<.001) and 0.001% in 2017 (P<.001) after implementation of the BTCM system. Only one incorrect labeling incident was noted among the 68,324 samples for blood typing, and no incorrect transfusions occurred among 67,423 transfusion orders in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates that continuous efforts to upgrade the existing process is critical to reduce errors in transfusion therapy, with support from information technology.