Cargando…

Validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography

Brain Tumor Image Analysis (BraTumIA) is a fully automated segmentation tool dedicated to detecting brain tumors imaged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BraTumIA has recently been applied to several clinical investigations; however, the validity of this novel method has not yet been fully examin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozaki, Tomohiko, Kinoshita, Manabu, Arita, Hideyuki, Kagawa, Naoki, Fujimoto, Yasunori, Kanemura, Yonehiro, Sakai, Mio, Watanabe, Yoshiyuki, Nakanishi, Katsuyuki, Shimosegawa, Eku, Hatazawa, Jun, Kishima, Haruhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10734
_version_ 1783449903193653248
author Ozaki, Tomohiko
Kinoshita, Manabu
Arita, Hideyuki
Kagawa, Naoki
Fujimoto, Yasunori
Kanemura, Yonehiro
Sakai, Mio
Watanabe, Yoshiyuki
Nakanishi, Katsuyuki
Shimosegawa, Eku
Hatazawa, Jun
Kishima, Haruhiko
author_facet Ozaki, Tomohiko
Kinoshita, Manabu
Arita, Hideyuki
Kagawa, Naoki
Fujimoto, Yasunori
Kanemura, Yonehiro
Sakai, Mio
Watanabe, Yoshiyuki
Nakanishi, Katsuyuki
Shimosegawa, Eku
Hatazawa, Jun
Kishima, Haruhiko
author_sort Ozaki, Tomohiko
collection PubMed
description Brain Tumor Image Analysis (BraTumIA) is a fully automated segmentation tool dedicated to detecting brain tumors imaged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BraTumIA has recently been applied to several clinical investigations; however, the validity of this novel method has not yet been fully examined. The present study was conducted to validate the quality of tumor segmentation with BraTumIA in comparison with results from (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET). A total of 45 consecutive newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas imaged by MRI and MET-PET were analyzed. Automatic tumor segmentation was conducted by BraTumIA and the resulting segmentation images were registered to MET-PET. Three-dimensional conformal association between these two modalities was calculated, considering MET-PET as the gold standard. High underestimation and overestimation errors were observed in tumor segmentation calculated by BraTumIA compared with MET-PET. Furthermore, when the tumor/normal ratio threshold was set at 1.3 from MET-PET, the BraTumIA false-positive fraction was ~0.4 and the false-negative fraction was 0.9. By tightening this threshold to 2.0, the BraTumIA false-positive fraction was 0.6 and the false-negative fraction was 0.6. Following comparison of segmentation performance with BraTumIA with regard to glioblastoma (GBM) and World Health Organization (WHO) grade III glioma, GBM exhibited better segmentation compared with WHO grade III glioma. Although BraTumIA may be able to detect enhanced tumors, non-enhancing tumors and necrosis, the spatial concordance rate with MET-PET was relatively low. Careful interpretation is therefore required when using this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6732988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67329882019-09-12 Validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography Ozaki, Tomohiko Kinoshita, Manabu Arita, Hideyuki Kagawa, Naoki Fujimoto, Yasunori Kanemura, Yonehiro Sakai, Mio Watanabe, Yoshiyuki Nakanishi, Katsuyuki Shimosegawa, Eku Hatazawa, Jun Kishima, Haruhiko Oncol Lett Articles Brain Tumor Image Analysis (BraTumIA) is a fully automated segmentation tool dedicated to detecting brain tumors imaged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BraTumIA has recently been applied to several clinical investigations; however, the validity of this novel method has not yet been fully examined. The present study was conducted to validate the quality of tumor segmentation with BraTumIA in comparison with results from (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET). A total of 45 consecutive newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas imaged by MRI and MET-PET were analyzed. Automatic tumor segmentation was conducted by BraTumIA and the resulting segmentation images were registered to MET-PET. Three-dimensional conformal association between these two modalities was calculated, considering MET-PET as the gold standard. High underestimation and overestimation errors were observed in tumor segmentation calculated by BraTumIA compared with MET-PET. Furthermore, when the tumor/normal ratio threshold was set at 1.3 from MET-PET, the BraTumIA false-positive fraction was ~0.4 and the false-negative fraction was 0.9. By tightening this threshold to 2.0, the BraTumIA false-positive fraction was 0.6 and the false-negative fraction was 0.6. Following comparison of segmentation performance with BraTumIA with regard to glioblastoma (GBM) and World Health Organization (WHO) grade III glioma, GBM exhibited better segmentation compared with WHO grade III glioma. Although BraTumIA may be able to detect enhanced tumors, non-enhancing tumors and necrosis, the spatial concordance rate with MET-PET was relatively low. Careful interpretation is therefore required when using this technique. D.A. Spandidos 2019-10 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6732988/ /pubmed/31516607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10734 Text en Copyright: © Ozaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Ozaki, Tomohiko
Kinoshita, Manabu
Arita, Hideyuki
Kagawa, Naoki
Fujimoto, Yasunori
Kanemura, Yonehiro
Sakai, Mio
Watanabe, Yoshiyuki
Nakanishi, Katsuyuki
Shimosegawa, Eku
Hatazawa, Jun
Kishima, Haruhiko
Validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography
title Validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography
title_full Validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography
title_fullStr Validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography
title_full_unstemmed Validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography
title_short Validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography
title_sort validation of magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic high-grade glioma segmentation accuracy via (11)c-methionine positron emission tomography
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10734
work_keys_str_mv AT ozakitomohiko validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT kinoshitamanabu validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT aritahideyuki validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT kagawanaoki validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT fujimotoyasunori validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT kanemurayonehiro validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT sakaimio validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT watanabeyoshiyuki validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT nakanishikatsuyuki validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT shimosegawaeku validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT hatazawajun validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography
AT kishimaharuhiko validationofmagneticresonanceimagingbasedautomatichighgradegliomasegmentationaccuracyvia11cmethioninepositronemissiontomography