Cargando…
The case for openness in engineering research
In this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the cha...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543946 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14593.2 |
_version_ | 1783449973497528320 |
---|---|
author | Berg, Devin R. Niemeyer, Kyle E. |
author_facet | Berg, Devin R. Niemeyer, Kyle E. |
author_sort | Berg, Devin R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the challenges faced by scholars looking to do so. Further, we present our thoughts and reflections on the role that open engineering research can play in defining the purpose and activities of the university. We have made some specific recommendations on how the public university can recommit to and push the boundaries of its role as the creator and promoter of public knowledge. In doing so, the university will further demonstrate its vital role in the continued economic, social, and technological development of society. We have also included some thoughts on how this applies specifically to the field of engineering and how a culture of openness and sharing within the engineering community can help drive societal development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6733375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67333752019-09-19 The case for openness in engineering research Berg, Devin R. Niemeyer, Kyle E. F1000Res Opinion Article In this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the challenges faced by scholars looking to do so. Further, we present our thoughts and reflections on the role that open engineering research can play in defining the purpose and activities of the university. We have made some specific recommendations on how the public university can recommit to and push the boundaries of its role as the creator and promoter of public knowledge. In doing so, the university will further demonstrate its vital role in the continued economic, social, and technological development of society. We have also included some thoughts on how this applies specifically to the field of engineering and how a culture of openness and sharing within the engineering community can help drive societal development. F1000 Research Limited 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6733375/ /pubmed/31543946 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14593.2 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Berg DR and Niemeyer KE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Article Berg, Devin R. Niemeyer, Kyle E. The case for openness in engineering research |
title | The case for openness in engineering research |
title_full | The case for openness in engineering research |
title_fullStr | The case for openness in engineering research |
title_full_unstemmed | The case for openness in engineering research |
title_short | The case for openness in engineering research |
title_sort | case for openness in engineering research |
topic | Opinion Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543946 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14593.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergdevinr thecaseforopennessinengineeringresearch AT niemeyerkylee thecaseforopennessinengineeringresearch AT bergdevinr caseforopennessinengineeringresearch AT niemeyerkylee caseforopennessinengineeringresearch |