Cargando…
Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) on periprocedural and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients treated with CAS for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid arterial stenosis were consecutively enrolled. Residual stenosis was estimated f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31498785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216592 |
_version_ | 1783449985801519104 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Jihoon Hong, Jeong-Ho Kim, Beom Joon Bae, Hee-Joon Kwon, O-Ki Oh, Chang Wan Jung, Cheolkyu Lee, Ji Sung Han, Moon-Ku |
author_facet | Kang, Jihoon Hong, Jeong-Ho Kim, Beom Joon Bae, Hee-Joon Kwon, O-Ki Oh, Chang Wan Jung, Cheolkyu Lee, Ji Sung Han, Moon-Ku |
author_sort | Kang, Jihoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) on periprocedural and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients treated with CAS for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid arterial stenosis were consecutively enrolled. Residual stenosis was estimated from post-procedure angiography findings. The effects of residual stenosis on 30-day periprocedural outcome and times to restenosis and clinical outcome were analyzed using logistic regression models and Wei-Lin-Weissfeld models, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (age, 64.7 ± 17.0 years; male, 82.0%) were enrolled. The median baseline stenosis was 80% (interquartile range [IQR], 70–90%), which improved to 10% (0–30%) for residual stenosis. Residual stenosis was significantly associated with periprocedural outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.983; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.965–0.999, P = 0.01) after adjustment for baseline stenosis, age, hypertension, symptomaticity, and statin use. Over the 5-year observation period, residual stenosis did not increase the global hazard for restenosis and clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 95% CI, 0.997–1.025. In the event-specific model, residual stenosis increased the hazard for restenosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.041; 1.012–1.072) but not for clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 0.997–1.025). CONCLUSIONS: Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting may be useful to predict periprocedural outcome and restenosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6733450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67334502019-09-20 Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes Kang, Jihoon Hong, Jeong-Ho Kim, Beom Joon Bae, Hee-Joon Kwon, O-Ki Oh, Chang Wan Jung, Cheolkyu Lee, Ji Sung Han, Moon-Ku PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) on periprocedural and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients treated with CAS for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid arterial stenosis were consecutively enrolled. Residual stenosis was estimated from post-procedure angiography findings. The effects of residual stenosis on 30-day periprocedural outcome and times to restenosis and clinical outcome were analyzed using logistic regression models and Wei-Lin-Weissfeld models, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (age, 64.7 ± 17.0 years; male, 82.0%) were enrolled. The median baseline stenosis was 80% (interquartile range [IQR], 70–90%), which improved to 10% (0–30%) for residual stenosis. Residual stenosis was significantly associated with periprocedural outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.983; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.965–0.999, P = 0.01) after adjustment for baseline stenosis, age, hypertension, symptomaticity, and statin use. Over the 5-year observation period, residual stenosis did not increase the global hazard for restenosis and clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 95% CI, 0.997–1.025. In the event-specific model, residual stenosis increased the hazard for restenosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.041; 1.012–1.072) but not for clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 0.997–1.025). CONCLUSIONS: Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting may be useful to predict periprocedural outcome and restenosis. Public Library of Science 2019-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6733450/ /pubmed/31498785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216592 Text en © 2019 Kang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kang, Jihoon Hong, Jeong-Ho Kim, Beom Joon Bae, Hee-Joon Kwon, O-Ki Oh, Chang Wan Jung, Cheolkyu Lee, Ji Sung Han, Moon-Ku Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes |
title | Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes |
title_full | Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes |
title_fullStr | Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes |
title_short | Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes |
title_sort | residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31498785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216592 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangjihoon residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes AT hongjeongho residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes AT kimbeomjoon residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes AT baeheejoon residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes AT kwonoki residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes AT ohchangwan residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes AT jungcheolkyu residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes AT leejisung residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes AT hanmoonku residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes |