Cargando…

Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) on periprocedural and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients treated with CAS for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid arterial stenosis were consecutively enrolled. Residual stenosis was estimated f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Jihoon, Hong, Jeong-Ho, Kim, Beom Joon, Bae, Hee-Joon, Kwon, O-Ki, Oh, Chang Wan, Jung, Cheolkyu, Lee, Ji Sung, Han, Moon-Ku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31498785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216592
_version_ 1783449985801519104
author Kang, Jihoon
Hong, Jeong-Ho
Kim, Beom Joon
Bae, Hee-Joon
Kwon, O-Ki
Oh, Chang Wan
Jung, Cheolkyu
Lee, Ji Sung
Han, Moon-Ku
author_facet Kang, Jihoon
Hong, Jeong-Ho
Kim, Beom Joon
Bae, Hee-Joon
Kwon, O-Ki
Oh, Chang Wan
Jung, Cheolkyu
Lee, Ji Sung
Han, Moon-Ku
author_sort Kang, Jihoon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) on periprocedural and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients treated with CAS for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid arterial stenosis were consecutively enrolled. Residual stenosis was estimated from post-procedure angiography findings. The effects of residual stenosis on 30-day periprocedural outcome and times to restenosis and clinical outcome were analyzed using logistic regression models and Wei-Lin-Weissfeld models, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (age, 64.7 ± 17.0 years; male, 82.0%) were enrolled. The median baseline stenosis was 80% (interquartile range [IQR], 70–90%), which improved to 10% (0–30%) for residual stenosis. Residual stenosis was significantly associated with periprocedural outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.983; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.965–0.999, P = 0.01) after adjustment for baseline stenosis, age, hypertension, symptomaticity, and statin use. Over the 5-year observation period, residual stenosis did not increase the global hazard for restenosis and clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 95% CI, 0.997–1.025. In the event-specific model, residual stenosis increased the hazard for restenosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.041; 1.012–1.072) but not for clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 0.997–1.025). CONCLUSIONS: Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting may be useful to predict periprocedural outcome and restenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6733450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67334502019-09-20 Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes Kang, Jihoon Hong, Jeong-Ho Kim, Beom Joon Bae, Hee-Joon Kwon, O-Ki Oh, Chang Wan Jung, Cheolkyu Lee, Ji Sung Han, Moon-Ku PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) on periprocedural and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients treated with CAS for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid arterial stenosis were consecutively enrolled. Residual stenosis was estimated from post-procedure angiography findings. The effects of residual stenosis on 30-day periprocedural outcome and times to restenosis and clinical outcome were analyzed using logistic regression models and Wei-Lin-Weissfeld models, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (age, 64.7 ± 17.0 years; male, 82.0%) were enrolled. The median baseline stenosis was 80% (interquartile range [IQR], 70–90%), which improved to 10% (0–30%) for residual stenosis. Residual stenosis was significantly associated with periprocedural outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.983; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.965–0.999, P = 0.01) after adjustment for baseline stenosis, age, hypertension, symptomaticity, and statin use. Over the 5-year observation period, residual stenosis did not increase the global hazard for restenosis and clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 95% CI, 0.997–1.025. In the event-specific model, residual stenosis increased the hazard for restenosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.041; 1.012–1.072) but not for clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 0.997–1.025). CONCLUSIONS: Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting may be useful to predict periprocedural outcome and restenosis. Public Library of Science 2019-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6733450/ /pubmed/31498785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216592 Text en © 2019 Kang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kang, Jihoon
Hong, Jeong-Ho
Kim, Beom Joon
Bae, Hee-Joon
Kwon, O-Ki
Oh, Chang Wan
Jung, Cheolkyu
Lee, Ji Sung
Han, Moon-Ku
Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes
title Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes
title_full Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes
title_fullStr Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes
title_short Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes
title_sort residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31498785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216592
work_keys_str_mv AT kangjihoon residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes
AT hongjeongho residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes
AT kimbeomjoon residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes
AT baeheejoon residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes
AT kwonoki residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes
AT ohchangwan residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes
AT jungcheolkyu residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes
AT leejisung residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes
AT hanmoonku residualstenosisaftercarotidarterystentingeffectonperiproceduralandlongtermoutcomes