Cargando…

Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas

Abstract. Species checklists and dichotomous keys are valuable tools that provide many services for ecological studies and management through tracking native and non-native species through time. We developed nine drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for 196 inland fishes of Texas, consisti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craig, Cody Andrew, Bonner, Timothy Hallman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537959
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.874.35618
_version_ 1783450029199982592
author Craig, Cody Andrew
Bonner, Timothy Hallman
author_facet Craig, Cody Andrew
Bonner, Timothy Hallman
author_sort Craig, Cody Andrew
collection PubMed
description Abstract. Species checklists and dichotomous keys are valuable tools that provide many services for ecological studies and management through tracking native and non-native species through time. We developed nine drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for 196 inland fishes of Texas, consisting of 171 native fishes and 25 non-native fishes. Our checklists were updated from previous checklists and revised using reports of new established native and non-native fishes in Texas, reports of new fish occurrences among drainages, and changes in species taxonomic nomenclature. We provided the first dichotomous keys for major drainage basins in Texas. Among the 171 native inland fishes, 6 species are considered extinct or extirpated, 13 species are listed as threatened or endangered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and 59 species are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) by the state of Texas. Red River drainage basin was the most speciose with 120 fishes. Rio Grande & Pecos drainage basin had the greatest number of threatened or endangered fishes (N = 7) and the greatest number of SGCN fishes (N = 28). We revised drainage basin occurrences for 77 species. Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys provide finer resolution of species distributions within the geopolitical boundaries of Texas and can reduce probability of errors in fish identification errors by removing species not occurring within a natural boundary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6733811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67338112019-09-19 Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas Craig, Cody Andrew Bonner, Timothy Hallman Zookeys Checklist Abstract. Species checklists and dichotomous keys are valuable tools that provide many services for ecological studies and management through tracking native and non-native species through time. We developed nine drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for 196 inland fishes of Texas, consisting of 171 native fishes and 25 non-native fishes. Our checklists were updated from previous checklists and revised using reports of new established native and non-native fishes in Texas, reports of new fish occurrences among drainages, and changes in species taxonomic nomenclature. We provided the first dichotomous keys for major drainage basins in Texas. Among the 171 native inland fishes, 6 species are considered extinct or extirpated, 13 species are listed as threatened or endangered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and 59 species are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) by the state of Texas. Red River drainage basin was the most speciose with 120 fishes. Rio Grande & Pecos drainage basin had the greatest number of threatened or endangered fishes (N = 7) and the greatest number of SGCN fishes (N = 28). We revised drainage basin occurrences for 77 species. Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys provide finer resolution of species distributions within the geopolitical boundaries of Texas and can reduce probability of errors in fish identification errors by removing species not occurring within a natural boundary. Pensoft Publishers 2019-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6733811/ /pubmed/31537959 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.874.35618 Text en Cody Andrew Craig, Timothy Hallman Bonner http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Checklist
Craig, Cody Andrew
Bonner, Timothy Hallman
Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas
title Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas
title_full Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas
title_fullStr Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas
title_full_unstemmed Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas
title_short Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas
title_sort drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of texas
topic Checklist
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537959
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.874.35618
work_keys_str_mv AT craigcodyandrew drainagebasinchecklistsanddichotomouskeysforinlandfishesoftexas
AT bonnertimothyhallman drainagebasinchecklistsanddichotomouskeysforinlandfishesoftexas