Cargando…
Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas
Abstract. Species checklists and dichotomous keys are valuable tools that provide many services for ecological studies and management through tracking native and non-native species through time. We developed nine drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for 196 inland fishes of Texas, consisti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pensoft Publishers
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537959 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.874.35618 |
_version_ | 1783450029199982592 |
---|---|
author | Craig, Cody Andrew Bonner, Timothy Hallman |
author_facet | Craig, Cody Andrew Bonner, Timothy Hallman |
author_sort | Craig, Cody Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abstract. Species checklists and dichotomous keys are valuable tools that provide many services for ecological studies and management through tracking native and non-native species through time. We developed nine drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for 196 inland fishes of Texas, consisting of 171 native fishes and 25 non-native fishes. Our checklists were updated from previous checklists and revised using reports of new established native and non-native fishes in Texas, reports of new fish occurrences among drainages, and changes in species taxonomic nomenclature. We provided the first dichotomous keys for major drainage basins in Texas. Among the 171 native inland fishes, 6 species are considered extinct or extirpated, 13 species are listed as threatened or endangered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and 59 species are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) by the state of Texas. Red River drainage basin was the most speciose with 120 fishes. Rio Grande & Pecos drainage basin had the greatest number of threatened or endangered fishes (N = 7) and the greatest number of SGCN fishes (N = 28). We revised drainage basin occurrences for 77 species. Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys provide finer resolution of species distributions within the geopolitical boundaries of Texas and can reduce probability of errors in fish identification errors by removing species not occurring within a natural boundary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6733811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67338112019-09-19 Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas Craig, Cody Andrew Bonner, Timothy Hallman Zookeys Checklist Abstract. Species checklists and dichotomous keys are valuable tools that provide many services for ecological studies and management through tracking native and non-native species through time. We developed nine drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for 196 inland fishes of Texas, consisting of 171 native fishes and 25 non-native fishes. Our checklists were updated from previous checklists and revised using reports of new established native and non-native fishes in Texas, reports of new fish occurrences among drainages, and changes in species taxonomic nomenclature. We provided the first dichotomous keys for major drainage basins in Texas. Among the 171 native inland fishes, 6 species are considered extinct or extirpated, 13 species are listed as threatened or endangered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and 59 species are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) by the state of Texas. Red River drainage basin was the most speciose with 120 fishes. Rio Grande & Pecos drainage basin had the greatest number of threatened or endangered fishes (N = 7) and the greatest number of SGCN fishes (N = 28). We revised drainage basin occurrences for 77 species. Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys provide finer resolution of species distributions within the geopolitical boundaries of Texas and can reduce probability of errors in fish identification errors by removing species not occurring within a natural boundary. Pensoft Publishers 2019-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6733811/ /pubmed/31537959 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.874.35618 Text en Cody Andrew Craig, Timothy Hallman Bonner http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Checklist Craig, Cody Andrew Bonner, Timothy Hallman Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas |
title | Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas |
title_full | Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas |
title_fullStr | Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas |
title_full_unstemmed | Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas |
title_short | Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas |
title_sort | drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of texas |
topic | Checklist |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537959 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.874.35618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT craigcodyandrew drainagebasinchecklistsanddichotomouskeysforinlandfishesoftexas AT bonnertimothyhallman drainagebasinchecklistsanddichotomouskeysforinlandfishesoftexas |