Cargando…

Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context

Early recognition of critically ill patients is of paramount importance to reduce pediatric mortality and morbidity. We created a risk stratification system combining vital parameters and predefined risk factors aimed at reducing the risk of unrecognized clinical deterioration compared with conventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teheux, Lara, Verlaat, Carin W., Lemson, Joris, Draaisma, Jos M. T., Fuijkschot, Joris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03446-0
_version_ 1783450030221295616
author Teheux, Lara
Verlaat, Carin W.
Lemson, Joris
Draaisma, Jos M. T.
Fuijkschot, Joris
author_facet Teheux, Lara
Verlaat, Carin W.
Lemson, Joris
Draaisma, Jos M. T.
Fuijkschot, Joris
author_sort Teheux, Lara
collection PubMed
description Early recognition of critically ill patients is of paramount importance to reduce pediatric mortality and morbidity. We created a risk stratification system combining vital parameters and predefined risk factors aimed at reducing the risk of unrecognized clinical deterioration compared with conventional Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS). This single-center retrospective case cohort study included infants (gestational age ≥ 37 weeks) to adolescents (aged <18 years) with unplanned pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission between April 01, 2014, and February 28, 2018. The sensitivity in the 24 h prior to endpoint of the Pediatric Risk Evaluation and Stratification System (PRESS) was compared with that of the conventional PEWS and calculated as the proportion of study patients who received a high-risk score. Seventy-four PICU admissions were included. PRESS and PEWS sensitivities at 2 h prior to endpoint were 0.70 (95%CI 0.59 to 0.80) and 0.30 (95%CI 0.20 to 0.42) respectively (p < 0.001). Excluding patients with seizures, PRESS sensitivity increased to 0.75 (95%CI 0.64 to 0.85). Forty-nine patients (66%) scored positive on at least one high-risk factor, and “worried sign” was scored in 31 patients (42%). Conclusion: Risk stratification seems advantageous for a faster detection of clinical deterioration, providing opportunity for earlier intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-019-03446-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6733815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67338152019-09-23 Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context Teheux, Lara Verlaat, Carin W. Lemson, Joris Draaisma, Jos M. T. Fuijkschot, Joris Eur J Pediatr Original Article Early recognition of critically ill patients is of paramount importance to reduce pediatric mortality and morbidity. We created a risk stratification system combining vital parameters and predefined risk factors aimed at reducing the risk of unrecognized clinical deterioration compared with conventional Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS). This single-center retrospective case cohort study included infants (gestational age ≥ 37 weeks) to adolescents (aged <18 years) with unplanned pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission between April 01, 2014, and February 28, 2018. The sensitivity in the 24 h prior to endpoint of the Pediatric Risk Evaluation and Stratification System (PRESS) was compared with that of the conventional PEWS and calculated as the proportion of study patients who received a high-risk score. Seventy-four PICU admissions were included. PRESS and PEWS sensitivities at 2 h prior to endpoint were 0.70 (95%CI 0.59 to 0.80) and 0.30 (95%CI 0.20 to 0.42) respectively (p < 0.001). Excluding patients with seizures, PRESS sensitivity increased to 0.75 (95%CI 0.64 to 0.85). Forty-nine patients (66%) scored positive on at least one high-risk factor, and “worried sign” was scored in 31 patients (42%). Conclusion: Risk stratification seems advantageous for a faster detection of clinical deterioration, providing opportunity for earlier intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-019-03446-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6733815/ /pubmed/31485752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03446-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Teheux, Lara
Verlaat, Carin W.
Lemson, Joris
Draaisma, Jos M. T.
Fuijkschot, Joris
Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context
title Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context
title_full Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context
title_fullStr Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context
title_full_unstemmed Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context
title_short Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context
title_sort risk stratification to improve pediatric early warning systems: it is all about the context
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03446-0
work_keys_str_mv AT teheuxlara riskstratificationtoimprovepediatricearlywarningsystemsitisallaboutthecontext
AT verlaatcarinw riskstratificationtoimprovepediatricearlywarningsystemsitisallaboutthecontext
AT lemsonjoris riskstratificationtoimprovepediatricearlywarningsystemsitisallaboutthecontext
AT draaismajosmt riskstratificationtoimprovepediatricearlywarningsystemsitisallaboutthecontext
AT fuijkschotjoris riskstratificationtoimprovepediatricearlywarningsystemsitisallaboutthecontext