Cargando…
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31054038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5 |
_version_ | 1783450032547037184 |
---|---|
author | Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Cowher, Michael S. Taback, Bret McLaughlin, Sarah Ajkay, Nicolas Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise DeSnyder, Sarah M. Wagner, Jamie Abramson, Vandana Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag |
author_facet | Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Cowher, Michael S. Taback, Bret McLaughlin, Sarah Ajkay, Nicolas Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise DeSnyder, Sarah M. Wagner, Jamie Abramson, Vandana Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag |
author_sort | Ridner, Sheila H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). METHODS: Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130). CONCLUSIONS: Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6733825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67338252019-09-23 A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Cowher, Michael S. Taback, Bret McLaughlin, Sarah Ajkay, Nicolas Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise DeSnyder, Sarah M. Wagner, Jamie Abramson, Vandana Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). METHODS: Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130). CONCLUSIONS: Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6733825/ /pubmed/31054038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Cowher, Michael S. Taback, Bret McLaughlin, Sarah Ajkay, Nicolas Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise DeSnyder, Sarah M. Wagner, Jamie Abramson, Vandana Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis |
title | A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis |
title_full | A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis |
title_short | A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis |
title_sort | randomized trial evaluating bioimpedance spectroscopy versus tape measurement for the prevention of lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer: interim analysis |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31054038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ridnersheilah arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT dietrichmarys arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT cowhermichaels arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT tabackbret arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT mclaughlinsarah arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT ajkaynicolas arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT boyagesjohn arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT koelmeyerlouise arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT desnydersarahm arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT wagnerjamie arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT abramsonvandana arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT mooreandrew arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT shahchirag arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT ridnersheilah randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT dietrichmarys randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT cowhermichaels randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT tabackbret randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT mclaughlinsarah randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT ajkaynicolas randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT boyagesjohn randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT koelmeyerlouise randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT desnydersarahm randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT wagnerjamie randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT abramsonvandana randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT mooreandrew randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis AT shahchirag randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis |