Cargando…

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridner, Sheila H., Dietrich, Mary S., Cowher, Michael S., Taback, Bret, McLaughlin, Sarah, Ajkay, Nicolas, Boyages, John, Koelmeyer, Louise, DeSnyder, Sarah M., Wagner, Jamie, Abramson, Vandana, Moore, Andrew, Shah, Chirag
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31054038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5
_version_ 1783450032547037184
author Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Cowher, Michael S.
Taback, Bret
McLaughlin, Sarah
Ajkay, Nicolas
Boyages, John
Koelmeyer, Louise
DeSnyder, Sarah M.
Wagner, Jamie
Abramson, Vandana
Moore, Andrew
Shah, Chirag
author_facet Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Cowher, Michael S.
Taback, Bret
McLaughlin, Sarah
Ajkay, Nicolas
Boyages, John
Koelmeyer, Louise
DeSnyder, Sarah M.
Wagner, Jamie
Abramson, Vandana
Moore, Andrew
Shah, Chirag
author_sort Ridner, Sheila H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). METHODS: Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130). CONCLUSIONS: Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6733825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67338252019-09-23 A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Cowher, Michael S. Taback, Bret McLaughlin, Sarah Ajkay, Nicolas Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise DeSnyder, Sarah M. Wagner, Jamie Abramson, Vandana Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). METHODS: Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130). CONCLUSIONS: Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6733825/ /pubmed/31054038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Cowher, Michael S.
Taback, Bret
McLaughlin, Sarah
Ajkay, Nicolas
Boyages, John
Koelmeyer, Louise
DeSnyder, Sarah M.
Wagner, Jamie
Abramson, Vandana
Moore, Andrew
Shah, Chirag
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
title A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
title_full A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
title_fullStr A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
title_short A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
title_sort randomized trial evaluating bioimpedance spectroscopy versus tape measurement for the prevention of lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer: interim analysis
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31054038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ridnersheilah arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT dietrichmarys arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT cowhermichaels arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT tabackbret arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT mclaughlinsarah arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT ajkaynicolas arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT boyagesjohn arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT koelmeyerlouise arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT desnydersarahm arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT wagnerjamie arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT abramsonvandana arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT mooreandrew arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT shahchirag arandomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT ridnersheilah randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT dietrichmarys randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT cowhermichaels randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT tabackbret randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT mclaughlinsarah randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT ajkaynicolas randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT boyagesjohn randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT koelmeyerlouise randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT desnydersarahm randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT wagnerjamie randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT abramsonvandana randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT mooreandrew randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis
AT shahchirag randomizedtrialevaluatingbioimpedancespectroscopyversustapemeasurementforthepreventionoflymphedemafollowingtreatmentforbreastcancerinterimanalysis