Cargando…

Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center

Objective: The aim of the present study is to report our experience on elective women fertility preservation before cancer treatment. Study Design: This is a single-center retrospective observational study, including all patients who underwent elective fertility preservation before oncological treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Specchia, Cristina, Baggiani, Annamaria, Immediata, Valentina, Ronchetti, Camilla, Cesana, Amalia, Smeraldi, Antonella, Scaravelli, Giulia, Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31551931
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00600
_version_ 1783450053298356224
author Specchia, Cristina
Baggiani, Annamaria
Immediata, Valentina
Ronchetti, Camilla
Cesana, Amalia
Smeraldi, Antonella
Scaravelli, Giulia
Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele
author_facet Specchia, Cristina
Baggiani, Annamaria
Immediata, Valentina
Ronchetti, Camilla
Cesana, Amalia
Smeraldi, Antonella
Scaravelli, Giulia
Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele
author_sort Specchia, Cristina
collection PubMed
description Objective: The aim of the present study is to report our experience on elective women fertility preservation before cancer treatment. Study Design: This is a single-center retrospective observational study, including all patients who underwent elective fertility preservation before oncological treatment between January 2001 and March 2019 at our Institute. Results: Of a total of 568 women who received fertility counseling, 244 (42.9%) underwent 252 oocyte retrieval cycles after controlled ovarian stimulation for cryopreservation. The majority of patients were diagnosed with breast cancer (59.9%), followed by women affected by Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (27.4%). A minority comprised patients diagnosed with other malignancies that affected soft tissues (2.8%), ovary borderline type (2.4%), digestive system (1.6%), leukemia (1.6%), uterine cervix (1.2%). The remaining 3.1% were affected by other cancer types. The mean age of the cohort was 31.3 ± 6.4 years and the mean oocyte retrieval was 13.5± 8.4. Of 11 women who returned to attempt a pregnancy, three performed two thawed cycles. We obtained four pregnancies from 24 embryo transfers (Pregnancy Rate 36.4% for couple): two miscarriages and two live births. Overall, 95.7% of oocytes are still in storage. Conclusions: A close collaboration between Cancer and Fertility Center in a tertiary care hospital is essential to provide a good health service in oncological patients. Offering fertility preservation is no longer considered optional and must be included in every therapeutic program for women who receive an oncological diagnosis in their reproductive age. Oocyte cryopreservation appears to be a good opportunity for fertility preservation. Our results, although they are obtained in a small sample, are encouraging, even if only 4.5% of patients returned to use their gametes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6733913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67339132019-09-24 Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center Specchia, Cristina Baggiani, Annamaria Immediata, Valentina Ronchetti, Camilla Cesana, Amalia Smeraldi, Antonella Scaravelli, Giulia Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Objective: The aim of the present study is to report our experience on elective women fertility preservation before cancer treatment. Study Design: This is a single-center retrospective observational study, including all patients who underwent elective fertility preservation before oncological treatment between January 2001 and March 2019 at our Institute. Results: Of a total of 568 women who received fertility counseling, 244 (42.9%) underwent 252 oocyte retrieval cycles after controlled ovarian stimulation for cryopreservation. The majority of patients were diagnosed with breast cancer (59.9%), followed by women affected by Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (27.4%). A minority comprised patients diagnosed with other malignancies that affected soft tissues (2.8%), ovary borderline type (2.4%), digestive system (1.6%), leukemia (1.6%), uterine cervix (1.2%). The remaining 3.1% were affected by other cancer types. The mean age of the cohort was 31.3 ± 6.4 years and the mean oocyte retrieval was 13.5± 8.4. Of 11 women who returned to attempt a pregnancy, three performed two thawed cycles. We obtained four pregnancies from 24 embryo transfers (Pregnancy Rate 36.4% for couple): two miscarriages and two live births. Overall, 95.7% of oocytes are still in storage. Conclusions: A close collaboration between Cancer and Fertility Center in a tertiary care hospital is essential to provide a good health service in oncological patients. Offering fertility preservation is no longer considered optional and must be included in every therapeutic program for women who receive an oncological diagnosis in their reproductive age. Oocyte cryopreservation appears to be a good opportunity for fertility preservation. Our results, although they are obtained in a small sample, are encouraging, even if only 4.5% of patients returned to use their gametes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6733913/ /pubmed/31551931 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00600 Text en Copyright © 2019 Specchia, Baggiani, Immediata, Ronchetti, Cesana, Smeraldi, Scaravelli and Levi-Setti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Specchia, Cristina
Baggiani, Annamaria
Immediata, Valentina
Ronchetti, Camilla
Cesana, Amalia
Smeraldi, Antonella
Scaravelli, Giulia
Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele
Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center
title Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center
title_full Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center
title_fullStr Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center
title_full_unstemmed Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center
title_short Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center
title_sort oocyte cryopreservation in oncological patients: eighteen years experience of a tertiary care referral center
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6733913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31551931
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00600
work_keys_str_mv AT specchiacristina oocytecryopreservationinoncologicalpatientseighteenyearsexperienceofatertiarycarereferralcenter
AT baggianiannamaria oocytecryopreservationinoncologicalpatientseighteenyearsexperienceofatertiarycarereferralcenter
AT immediatavalentina oocytecryopreservationinoncologicalpatientseighteenyearsexperienceofatertiarycarereferralcenter
AT ronchetticamilla oocytecryopreservationinoncologicalpatientseighteenyearsexperienceofatertiarycarereferralcenter
AT cesanaamalia oocytecryopreservationinoncologicalpatientseighteenyearsexperienceofatertiarycarereferralcenter
AT smeraldiantonella oocytecryopreservationinoncologicalpatientseighteenyearsexperienceofatertiarycarereferralcenter
AT scaravelligiulia oocytecryopreservationinoncologicalpatientseighteenyearsexperienceofatertiarycarereferralcenter
AT levisettipaoloemanuele oocytecryopreservationinoncologicalpatientseighteenyearsexperienceofatertiarycarereferralcenter