Cargando…

Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?

This study investigated hearing threshold changes during the first year of corrected age (CA) in infants admitted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In 5 years, 239 infants with birth weight (BW) ≤ 1,000 gm and/or gestational age (GA) ≤ 30 weeks were enrolled. Hearing was evaluated by oto-aco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: FREZZA, S., CATENAZZI, P., GALLUS, R., GALLINI, F., FIORETTI, M., ANZIVINO, R., CORSELLO, M., COTA, F., VENTO, G., CONTI, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore Srl 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501617
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-2116
_version_ 1783450102814212096
author FREZZA, S.
CATENAZZI, P.
GALLUS, R.
GALLINI, F.
FIORETTI, M.
ANZIVINO, R.
CORSELLO, M.
COTA, F.
VENTO, G.
CONTI, G.
author_facet FREZZA, S.
CATENAZZI, P.
GALLUS, R.
GALLINI, F.
FIORETTI, M.
ANZIVINO, R.
CORSELLO, M.
COTA, F.
VENTO, G.
CONTI, G.
author_sort FREZZA, S.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated hearing threshold changes during the first year of corrected age (CA) in infants admitted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In 5 years, 239 infants with birth weight (BW) ≤ 1,000 gm and/or gestational age (GA) ≤ 30 weeks were enrolled. Hearing was evaluated by oto-acoustic emission (OAEs) before discharge and auditory brainstem response (ABR) within 3 months of CA. Infants affected by unilateral or bilateral hearing loss were addressed to audiological follow-up until definitive diagnosis (within 6 months of CA). Changes in hearing threshold were also carefully analysed. 207 (86.6%) infants had normal hearing while 32 infants (13.4%) showed hearing loss (HL) at the confirmative ABR evaluation (9 mild, 16 moderate, 4 severe, 3 profound). The latter showed lower GA (27.7 ± 2 vs 28.4 ± 1.2; p = 0.0061) and BW (950 ± 390 vs 1,119 ± 326 gm; p = 0.0085). At final evaluation, 15 infants (47%) recovered a normal hearing. HL was confirmed in 17 patients. Among these, 3 infants were addressed to audiological follow-up (one case of mild unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and two with moderate UHL), while in 14 cases (44%) with bilateral sensory neural hearing loss (SNHL) (7 moderate, 4 severe, 3 profound) hearing aids were prescribed. They showed significantly lower GA and longer hospital stay in the NICU in comparison with infants without indication for audiological habilitation (18 infants) (GA 26.2 ± 2.2 weeks vs 28.4 ± 2.4; p = 0.01; NICU stay 132 ± 67 vs 59 ± 7; p = 0.0002). Definitive diagnosis was obtained at 5.9 ± 1.3 months of CA. Our study confirms the importance of audiological surveillance in preterm newborns. Hearing thresholds of preterm infants with hearing loss can change during the first year of CA and we observed normalisation in 47% of our patients. Most vulnerable to permanent SNHL were very preterm infants with a longer NICU stay, while a shorter stay represents a favourable prognostic factor for hearing improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6734205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Pacini Editore Srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67342052019-09-14 Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat? FREZZA, S. CATENAZZI, P. GALLUS, R. GALLINI, F. FIORETTI, M. ANZIVINO, R. CORSELLO, M. COTA, F. VENTO, G. CONTI, G. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Audiology This study investigated hearing threshold changes during the first year of corrected age (CA) in infants admitted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In 5 years, 239 infants with birth weight (BW) ≤ 1,000 gm and/or gestational age (GA) ≤ 30 weeks were enrolled. Hearing was evaluated by oto-acoustic emission (OAEs) before discharge and auditory brainstem response (ABR) within 3 months of CA. Infants affected by unilateral or bilateral hearing loss were addressed to audiological follow-up until definitive diagnosis (within 6 months of CA). Changes in hearing threshold were also carefully analysed. 207 (86.6%) infants had normal hearing while 32 infants (13.4%) showed hearing loss (HL) at the confirmative ABR evaluation (9 mild, 16 moderate, 4 severe, 3 profound). The latter showed lower GA (27.7 ± 2 vs 28.4 ± 1.2; p = 0.0061) and BW (950 ± 390 vs 1,119 ± 326 gm; p = 0.0085). At final evaluation, 15 infants (47%) recovered a normal hearing. HL was confirmed in 17 patients. Among these, 3 infants were addressed to audiological follow-up (one case of mild unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and two with moderate UHL), while in 14 cases (44%) with bilateral sensory neural hearing loss (SNHL) (7 moderate, 4 severe, 3 profound) hearing aids were prescribed. They showed significantly lower GA and longer hospital stay in the NICU in comparison with infants without indication for audiological habilitation (18 infants) (GA 26.2 ± 2.2 weeks vs 28.4 ± 2.4; p = 0.01; NICU stay 132 ± 67 vs 59 ± 7; p = 0.0002). Definitive diagnosis was obtained at 5.9 ± 1.3 months of CA. Our study confirms the importance of audiological surveillance in preterm newborns. Hearing thresholds of preterm infants with hearing loss can change during the first year of CA and we observed normalisation in 47% of our patients. Most vulnerable to permanent SNHL were very preterm infants with a longer NICU stay, while a shorter stay represents a favourable prognostic factor for hearing improvement. Pacini Editore Srl 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6734205/ /pubmed/31501617 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-2116 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any digital medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. For details, please refer to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Audiology
FREZZA, S.
CATENAZZI, P.
GALLUS, R.
GALLINI, F.
FIORETTI, M.
ANZIVINO, R.
CORSELLO, M.
COTA, F.
VENTO, G.
CONTI, G.
Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?
title Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?
title_full Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?
title_fullStr Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?
title_full_unstemmed Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?
title_short Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?
title_sort hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?
topic Audiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501617
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-2116
work_keys_str_mv AT frezzas hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT catenazzip hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT gallusr hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT gallinif hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT fiorettim hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT anzivinor hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT corsellom hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT cotaf hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT ventog hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat
AT contig hearinglossinverypreterminfantsshouldwewaitortreat