Cargando…

Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new?

Epistaxis is one of the most common complaints presenting to emergency departments. The aim of this study is to systematically review and critically evaluate the evidence relating to treatment of idiopathic epistaxis for guiding best practice. A comprehensive review of the English language literatur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MECCARIELLO, G., GEORGALAS, C., MONTEVECCHI, F., CAMMAROTO, G., GOBBI, R., FIRINU, E., DE VITO, A., VICINI, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore Srl 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30933179
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-2155
_version_ 1783450103052238848
author MECCARIELLO, G.
GEORGALAS, C.
MONTEVECCHI, F.
CAMMAROTO, G.
GOBBI, R.
FIRINU, E.
DE VITO, A.
VICINI, C.
author_facet MECCARIELLO, G.
GEORGALAS, C.
MONTEVECCHI, F.
CAMMAROTO, G.
GOBBI, R.
FIRINU, E.
DE VITO, A.
VICINI, C.
author_sort MECCARIELLO, G.
collection PubMed
description Epistaxis is one of the most common complaints presenting to emergency departments. The aim of this study is to systematically review and critically evaluate the evidence relating to treatment of idiopathic epistaxis for guiding best practice. A comprehensive review of the English language literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Central electronic databases. The inclusion criteria were: retrospective or prospective or randomised controlled clinical trials which included outcomes in the management of idiopathic epistaxis. Twenty-three articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Nasal packing still represents the first-line approach to epistaxis, although, at present, it appears that there is clear evidence in the literature to suggest that it is less effective and associated with more admissions and longer hospital stays than endoscopic electrocoagulation-based management of epistaxis. In conclusion, cauterisation should be the first-line approach for its high cost-effectiveness rate and low risk of complications. Further research is urgently needed to assess the efficacy of new biomaterials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6734206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Pacini Editore Srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67342062019-09-14 Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new? MECCARIELLO, G. GEORGALAS, C. MONTEVECCHI, F. CAMMAROTO, G. GOBBI, R. FIRINU, E. DE VITO, A. VICINI, C. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Review Epistaxis is one of the most common complaints presenting to emergency departments. The aim of this study is to systematically review and critically evaluate the evidence relating to treatment of idiopathic epistaxis for guiding best practice. A comprehensive review of the English language literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Central electronic databases. The inclusion criteria were: retrospective or prospective or randomised controlled clinical trials which included outcomes in the management of idiopathic epistaxis. Twenty-three articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Nasal packing still represents the first-line approach to epistaxis, although, at present, it appears that there is clear evidence in the literature to suggest that it is less effective and associated with more admissions and longer hospital stays than endoscopic electrocoagulation-based management of epistaxis. In conclusion, cauterisation should be the first-line approach for its high cost-effectiveness rate and low risk of complications. Further research is urgently needed to assess the efficacy of new biomaterials. Pacini Editore Srl 2019-08 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6734206/ /pubmed/30933179 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-2155 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any digital medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. For details, please refer to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
MECCARIELLO, G.
GEORGALAS, C.
MONTEVECCHI, F.
CAMMAROTO, G.
GOBBI, R.
FIRINU, E.
DE VITO, A.
VICINI, C.
Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new?
title Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new?
title_full Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new?
title_fullStr Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new?
title_full_unstemmed Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new?
title_short Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new?
title_sort management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what’s new?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30933179
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-2155
work_keys_str_mv AT meccariellog managementofidiopathicepistaxisinadultswhatsnew
AT georgalasc managementofidiopathicepistaxisinadultswhatsnew
AT montevecchif managementofidiopathicepistaxisinadultswhatsnew
AT cammarotog managementofidiopathicepistaxisinadultswhatsnew
AT gobbir managementofidiopathicepistaxisinadultswhatsnew
AT firinue managementofidiopathicepistaxisinadultswhatsnew
AT devitoa managementofidiopathicepistaxisinadultswhatsnew
AT vicinic managementofidiopathicepistaxisinadultswhatsnew