Cargando…

Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery

BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately and comprehensively identify genomic variations is critical for plant studies utilizing high-throughput sequencing. Most bioinformatics tools for processing next-generation sequencing data were originally developed and tested in human studies, raising questions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xing, Heffelfinger, Christopher, Zhao, Hongyu, Dellaporta, Stephen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6057-7
_version_ 1783450104717377536
author Wu, Xing
Heffelfinger, Christopher
Zhao, Hongyu
Dellaporta, Stephen L.
author_facet Wu, Xing
Heffelfinger, Christopher
Zhao, Hongyu
Dellaporta, Stephen L.
author_sort Wu, Xing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately and comprehensively identify genomic variations is critical for plant studies utilizing high-throughput sequencing. Most bioinformatics tools for processing next-generation sequencing data were originally developed and tested in human studies, raising questions as to their efficacy for plant research. A detailed evaluation of the entire variant calling pipeline, including alignment, variant calling, variant filtering, and imputation was performed on different programs using both simulated and real plant genomic datasets. RESULTS: A comparison of SOAP2, Bowtie2, and BWA-MEM found that BWA-MEM was consistently able to align the most reads with high accuracy, whereas Bowtie2 had the highest overall accuracy. Comparative results of GATK HaplotypCaller versus SAMtools mpileup indicated that the choice of variant caller affected precision and recall differentially depending on the levels of diversity, sequence coverage and genome complexity. A cross-reference experiment of S. lycopersicum and S. pennellii reference genomes revealed the inadequacy of single reference genome for variant discovery that includes distantly-related plant individuals. Machine-learning-based variant filtering strategy outperformed the traditional hard-cutoff strategy resulting in higher number of true positive variants and fewer false positive variants. A 2-step imputation method, which utilized a set of high-confidence SNPs as the reference panel, showed up to 60% higher accuracy than direct LD-based imputation. CONCLUSIONS: Programs in the variant discovery pipeline have different performance on plant genomic dataset. Choice of the programs is subjected to the goal of the study and available resources. This study serves as an important guiding information for plant biologists utilizing next-generation sequencing data for diversity characterization and crop improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-6057-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6734213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67342132019-09-12 Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery Wu, Xing Heffelfinger, Christopher Zhao, Hongyu Dellaporta, Stephen L. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately and comprehensively identify genomic variations is critical for plant studies utilizing high-throughput sequencing. Most bioinformatics tools for processing next-generation sequencing data were originally developed and tested in human studies, raising questions as to their efficacy for plant research. A detailed evaluation of the entire variant calling pipeline, including alignment, variant calling, variant filtering, and imputation was performed on different programs using both simulated and real plant genomic datasets. RESULTS: A comparison of SOAP2, Bowtie2, and BWA-MEM found that BWA-MEM was consistently able to align the most reads with high accuracy, whereas Bowtie2 had the highest overall accuracy. Comparative results of GATK HaplotypCaller versus SAMtools mpileup indicated that the choice of variant caller affected precision and recall differentially depending on the levels of diversity, sequence coverage and genome complexity. A cross-reference experiment of S. lycopersicum and S. pennellii reference genomes revealed the inadequacy of single reference genome for variant discovery that includes distantly-related plant individuals. Machine-learning-based variant filtering strategy outperformed the traditional hard-cutoff strategy resulting in higher number of true positive variants and fewer false positive variants. A 2-step imputation method, which utilized a set of high-confidence SNPs as the reference panel, showed up to 60% higher accuracy than direct LD-based imputation. CONCLUSIONS: Programs in the variant discovery pipeline have different performance on plant genomic dataset. Choice of the programs is subjected to the goal of the study and available resources. This study serves as an important guiding information for plant biologists utilizing next-generation sequencing data for diversity characterization and crop improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-6057-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6734213/ /pubmed/31500583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6057-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Xing
Heffelfinger, Christopher
Zhao, Hongyu
Dellaporta, Stephen L.
Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery
title Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery
title_full Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery
title_fullStr Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery
title_short Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery
title_sort benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6057-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxing benchmarkingvariantidentificationtoolsforplantdiversitydiscovery
AT heffelfingerchristopher benchmarkingvariantidentificationtoolsforplantdiversitydiscovery
AT zhaohongyu benchmarkingvariantidentificationtoolsforplantdiversitydiscovery
AT dellaportastephenl benchmarkingvariantidentificationtoolsforplantdiversitydiscovery