Cargando…

Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the main curative option for the treatment of intraspinal tumour. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty with process-lamina complex replantation compared with laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation for intraspinal tumours....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Zhaojun, Zhang, Zhi, Ye, Yongjie, Zheng, Jiazhuang, Wang, Fandong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0602-9
_version_ 1783450143301828608
author Song, Zhaojun
Zhang, Zhi
Ye, Yongjie
Zheng, Jiazhuang
Wang, Fandong
author_facet Song, Zhaojun
Zhang, Zhi
Ye, Yongjie
Zheng, Jiazhuang
Wang, Fandong
author_sort Song, Zhaojun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the main curative option for the treatment of intraspinal tumour. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty with process-lamina complex replantation compared with laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation for intraspinal tumours. METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, 27 patients received tumour resection surgery by laminoplasty with reconstruction plate fixation and 32 patients received laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Data, including surgical time, blood loss, volume of drainage, drainage time, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status were compared. In addition, imaging evaluation was also included. RESULTS: Patients in the laminoplasty group had lower blood loss (laminoplasty group: 281.5 ± 130.2 mL; laminectomy group: 450.0 ± 224.3 mL; p = 0.001), shorter surgical time (laminoplasty group: 141.7 ± 26.2 min, laminectomy group: 175.3 ± 50.4 min; p = 0.003), lower volume of drainage (laminoplasty group: 1578.9 ± 821.7 mL, laminectomy group: 2621.2 ± 1351.0 mL; p = 0.001), shorter drainage time (laminoplasty group: 6.6 ± 2.5 days, laminectomy group: 9.7 ± 1.8 days; p = 0.000), and a shorter hospital stay (laminoplasty group: 16.9 ± 4.9 days, laminectomy group: 21.0 ± 4.4 days; p = 0.002) compared with patients in the laminectomy group. There were significant differences of oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.034). The incidence of secondary spinal stenosis in the laminoplasty group was significantly reduced (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Laminoplasty in intraspinal tumour resection has a lower blood loss and volume of drainage, shorter surgical time and hospital stay as advantages over the standard laminectomy technique. Moreover, laminoplasty can effectively avoid iatrogenic spinal canal stenosis and thus enhancing functional recovery of spinal cord.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6734390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67343902019-09-12 Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours Song, Zhaojun Zhang, Zhi Ye, Yongjie Zheng, Jiazhuang Wang, Fandong BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the main curative option for the treatment of intraspinal tumour. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty with process-lamina complex replantation compared with laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation for intraspinal tumours. METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, 27 patients received tumour resection surgery by laminoplasty with reconstruction plate fixation and 32 patients received laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Data, including surgical time, blood loss, volume of drainage, drainage time, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status were compared. In addition, imaging evaluation was also included. RESULTS: Patients in the laminoplasty group had lower blood loss (laminoplasty group: 281.5 ± 130.2 mL; laminectomy group: 450.0 ± 224.3 mL; p = 0.001), shorter surgical time (laminoplasty group: 141.7 ± 26.2 min, laminectomy group: 175.3 ± 50.4 min; p = 0.003), lower volume of drainage (laminoplasty group: 1578.9 ± 821.7 mL, laminectomy group: 2621.2 ± 1351.0 mL; p = 0.001), shorter drainage time (laminoplasty group: 6.6 ± 2.5 days, laminectomy group: 9.7 ± 1.8 days; p = 0.000), and a shorter hospital stay (laminoplasty group: 16.9 ± 4.9 days, laminectomy group: 21.0 ± 4.4 days; p = 0.002) compared with patients in the laminectomy group. There were significant differences of oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.034). The incidence of secondary spinal stenosis in the laminoplasty group was significantly reduced (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Laminoplasty in intraspinal tumour resection has a lower blood loss and volume of drainage, shorter surgical time and hospital stay as advantages over the standard laminectomy technique. Moreover, laminoplasty can effectively avoid iatrogenic spinal canal stenosis and thus enhancing functional recovery of spinal cord. BioMed Central 2019-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6734390/ /pubmed/31500614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0602-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Song, Zhaojun
Zhang, Zhi
Ye, Yongjie
Zheng, Jiazhuang
Wang, Fandong
Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours
title Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours
title_full Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours
title_fullStr Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours
title_short Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours
title_sort efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0602-9
work_keys_str_mv AT songzhaojun efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours
AT zhangzhi efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours
AT yeyongjie efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours
AT zhengjiazhuang efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours
AT wangfandong efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours