Cargando…
Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours
BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the main curative option for the treatment of intraspinal tumour. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty with process-lamina complex replantation compared with laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation for intraspinal tumours....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0602-9 |
_version_ | 1783450143301828608 |
---|---|
author | Song, Zhaojun Zhang, Zhi Ye, Yongjie Zheng, Jiazhuang Wang, Fandong |
author_facet | Song, Zhaojun Zhang, Zhi Ye, Yongjie Zheng, Jiazhuang Wang, Fandong |
author_sort | Song, Zhaojun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the main curative option for the treatment of intraspinal tumour. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty with process-lamina complex replantation compared with laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation for intraspinal tumours. METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, 27 patients received tumour resection surgery by laminoplasty with reconstruction plate fixation and 32 patients received laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Data, including surgical time, blood loss, volume of drainage, drainage time, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status were compared. In addition, imaging evaluation was also included. RESULTS: Patients in the laminoplasty group had lower blood loss (laminoplasty group: 281.5 ± 130.2 mL; laminectomy group: 450.0 ± 224.3 mL; p = 0.001), shorter surgical time (laminoplasty group: 141.7 ± 26.2 min, laminectomy group: 175.3 ± 50.4 min; p = 0.003), lower volume of drainage (laminoplasty group: 1578.9 ± 821.7 mL, laminectomy group: 2621.2 ± 1351.0 mL; p = 0.001), shorter drainage time (laminoplasty group: 6.6 ± 2.5 days, laminectomy group: 9.7 ± 1.8 days; p = 0.000), and a shorter hospital stay (laminoplasty group: 16.9 ± 4.9 days, laminectomy group: 21.0 ± 4.4 days; p = 0.002) compared with patients in the laminectomy group. There were significant differences of oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.034). The incidence of secondary spinal stenosis in the laminoplasty group was significantly reduced (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Laminoplasty in intraspinal tumour resection has a lower blood loss and volume of drainage, shorter surgical time and hospital stay as advantages over the standard laminectomy technique. Moreover, laminoplasty can effectively avoid iatrogenic spinal canal stenosis and thus enhancing functional recovery of spinal cord. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6734390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67343902019-09-12 Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours Song, Zhaojun Zhang, Zhi Ye, Yongjie Zheng, Jiazhuang Wang, Fandong BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the main curative option for the treatment of intraspinal tumour. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty with process-lamina complex replantation compared with laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation for intraspinal tumours. METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, 27 patients received tumour resection surgery by laminoplasty with reconstruction plate fixation and 32 patients received laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Data, including surgical time, blood loss, volume of drainage, drainage time, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status were compared. In addition, imaging evaluation was also included. RESULTS: Patients in the laminoplasty group had lower blood loss (laminoplasty group: 281.5 ± 130.2 mL; laminectomy group: 450.0 ± 224.3 mL; p = 0.001), shorter surgical time (laminoplasty group: 141.7 ± 26.2 min, laminectomy group: 175.3 ± 50.4 min; p = 0.003), lower volume of drainage (laminoplasty group: 1578.9 ± 821.7 mL, laminectomy group: 2621.2 ± 1351.0 mL; p = 0.001), shorter drainage time (laminoplasty group: 6.6 ± 2.5 days, laminectomy group: 9.7 ± 1.8 days; p = 0.000), and a shorter hospital stay (laminoplasty group: 16.9 ± 4.9 days, laminectomy group: 21.0 ± 4.4 days; p = 0.002) compared with patients in the laminectomy group. There were significant differences of oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.034). The incidence of secondary spinal stenosis in the laminoplasty group was significantly reduced (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Laminoplasty in intraspinal tumour resection has a lower blood loss and volume of drainage, shorter surgical time and hospital stay as advantages over the standard laminectomy technique. Moreover, laminoplasty can effectively avoid iatrogenic spinal canal stenosis and thus enhancing functional recovery of spinal cord. BioMed Central 2019-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6734390/ /pubmed/31500614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0602-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Song, Zhaojun Zhang, Zhi Ye, Yongjie Zheng, Jiazhuang Wang, Fandong Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours |
title | Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours |
title_full | Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours |
title_fullStr | Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours |
title_short | Efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours |
title_sort | efficacy analysis of two surgical treatments for thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumours |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0602-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songzhaojun efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours AT zhangzhi efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours AT yeyongjie efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours AT zhengjiazhuang efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours AT wangfandong efficacyanalysisoftwosurgicaltreatmentsforthoracicandlumbarintraspinaltumours |