Cargando…
Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention
BACKGROUND: Adherence to a therapy, though a key factor for successful treatment, is low among patients with chronic conditions such as migraine. Dose frequency plays a major role in adherence. This study evaluated the impact of having flexible dosing options on acceptance of and adherence to a new...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0998-8 |
_version_ | 1783450147347234816 |
---|---|
author | Cowan, Robert Cohen, Joshua M. Rosenman, Erik Iyer, Ravi |
author_facet | Cowan, Robert Cohen, Joshua M. Rosenman, Erik Iyer, Ravi |
author_sort | Cowan, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adherence to a therapy, though a key factor for successful treatment, is low among patients with chronic conditions such as migraine. Dose frequency plays a major role in adherence. This study evaluated the impact of having flexible dosing options on acceptance of and adherence to a new migraine preventive therapy class among adults with migraine. METHODS: In this observational study, two 20-min online surveys were completed: one by physicians currently treating adult patients with migraine and the other by adults with migraine. Both surveys presented the participants with three scenarios: 1) only monthly, 2) only quarterly, and 3) both dosing options of the new medication are available. Physicians estimated the proportion of their migraine patients who would receive the new medication in each scenario. Patients were asked about their dosing preference when either or both options are available. Respondents were asked to rate the likelihood of their acceptance of and adherence to the therapy. RESULTS: 400 physicians and 417 US adults with migraine completed the surveys. The availability of both dosing options yielded a significant increase in the proportion of patients expected to receive the new medication. The overall proportion of patients favoring monthly dosing (35%) was similar to the proportion favoring quarterly dosing (40%). Among those who preferred monthly dosing (n = 147), a greater proportion indicated they are more likely to fill the prescription (77% vs 56%, P < 0.05) and remain adherent (80% vs 57%, P < 0.05) when only monthly is available versus when only quarterly is available. Similarly, among those who preferred quarterly dosing (n = 166), a greater proportion indicated they are likely to fill (63% vs 55%, P < 0.05) and remain adherent (62% vs 54%, P < 0.05) when only quarterly is available compared with when only monthly is available. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians anticipated that the proportion of patients to receive the new medication would increase when both dosing options are available. Patients stated that they are more likely to fill the prescription and adhere to the new therapy when their preferred dosing regimen is available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6734424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67344242019-09-12 Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention Cowan, Robert Cohen, Joshua M. Rosenman, Erik Iyer, Ravi J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Adherence to a therapy, though a key factor for successful treatment, is low among patients with chronic conditions such as migraine. Dose frequency plays a major role in adherence. This study evaluated the impact of having flexible dosing options on acceptance of and adherence to a new migraine preventive therapy class among adults with migraine. METHODS: In this observational study, two 20-min online surveys were completed: one by physicians currently treating adult patients with migraine and the other by adults with migraine. Both surveys presented the participants with three scenarios: 1) only monthly, 2) only quarterly, and 3) both dosing options of the new medication are available. Physicians estimated the proportion of their migraine patients who would receive the new medication in each scenario. Patients were asked about their dosing preference when either or both options are available. Respondents were asked to rate the likelihood of their acceptance of and adherence to the therapy. RESULTS: 400 physicians and 417 US adults with migraine completed the surveys. The availability of both dosing options yielded a significant increase in the proportion of patients expected to receive the new medication. The overall proportion of patients favoring monthly dosing (35%) was similar to the proportion favoring quarterly dosing (40%). Among those who preferred monthly dosing (n = 147), a greater proportion indicated they are more likely to fill the prescription (77% vs 56%, P < 0.05) and remain adherent (80% vs 57%, P < 0.05) when only monthly is available versus when only quarterly is available. Similarly, among those who preferred quarterly dosing (n = 166), a greater proportion indicated they are likely to fill (63% vs 55%, P < 0.05) and remain adherent (62% vs 54%, P < 0.05) when only quarterly is available compared with when only monthly is available. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians anticipated that the proportion of patients to receive the new medication would increase when both dosing options are available. Patients stated that they are more likely to fill the prescription and adhere to the new therapy when their preferred dosing regimen is available. Springer Milan 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6734424/ /pubmed/31072307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0998-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cowan, Robert Cohen, Joshua M. Rosenman, Erik Iyer, Ravi Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention |
title | Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention |
title_full | Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention |
title_fullStr | Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention |
title_full_unstemmed | Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention |
title_short | Physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention |
title_sort | physician and patient preferences for dosing options in migraine prevention |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0998-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cowanrobert physicianandpatientpreferencesfordosingoptionsinmigraineprevention AT cohenjoshuam physicianandpatientpreferencesfordosingoptionsinmigraineprevention AT rosenmanerik physicianandpatientpreferencesfordosingoptionsinmigraineprevention AT iyerravi physicianandpatientpreferencesfordosingoptionsinmigraineprevention |