Cargando…

Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Headache disorder is not only a common complaint but also a global burden. Pharmacotherapeutic and non-pharmacotherapeutic approaches have been developed for its treatment and prophylaxis. The present study included a systematic review of psychological treatments for primary headache dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hye Jeong, Lee, Jin Hyeok, Cho, Eun Young, Kim, Sun Mi, Yoon, Seoyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30764752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0965-4
_version_ 1783450150656540672
author Lee, Hye Jeong
Lee, Jin Hyeok
Cho, Eun Young
Kim, Sun Mi
Yoon, Seoyoung
author_facet Lee, Hye Jeong
Lee, Jin Hyeok
Cho, Eun Young
Kim, Sun Mi
Yoon, Seoyoung
author_sort Lee, Hye Jeong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Headache disorder is not only a common complaint but also a global burden. Pharmacotherapeutic and non-pharmacotherapeutic approaches have been developed for its treatment and prophylaxis. The present study included a systematic review of psychological treatments for primary headache disorder accessible in Korea. METHODS: We included English and Korean articles from EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane library database, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycArticles and Korean database, KoreaMed and KMBASE which studied primary headache and medication-overuse headache. The primary efficacy measure was the number of headache days per month, while secondary efficacy measures were the number of headache attacks per week, headache index, treatment response rate, and migraine disability assessment. The meta-analysis was performed using R 3.5.1. to obtain pooled mean difference and pooled relative risk with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data and dichotomous data, respectively. RESULTS: From 12,773 identified articles, 27 randomized clinical trials were identified. Primary outcome showed significant superiority of psychological treatments (pooled mean difference = − 0.70, 95% CI [− 1.22, − 0.18]). For the secondary outcomes, the number of headache attacks (pooled mean difference = − 1.15, 95% CI [− 1.63, − 0.67]), the headache index (pooled mean difference = − 0.92, 95% CI [− 1.40 to − 0.44]) and the treatment response rate (pooled relative risk = 3.13, 95% CI [2.24, 4.37]) demonstrated significant improvements in the psychological treatment group over the control group. CONCLUSION: Psychological treatments for primary headache disorder reduced headache frequency and the headache index. Future research using standardized outcome measures and strategies for reducing bias is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s10194-019-0965-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6734438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67344382019-09-12 Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lee, Hye Jeong Lee, Jin Hyeok Cho, Eun Young Kim, Sun Mi Yoon, Seoyoung J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Headache disorder is not only a common complaint but also a global burden. Pharmacotherapeutic and non-pharmacotherapeutic approaches have been developed for its treatment and prophylaxis. The present study included a systematic review of psychological treatments for primary headache disorder accessible in Korea. METHODS: We included English and Korean articles from EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane library database, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycArticles and Korean database, KoreaMed and KMBASE which studied primary headache and medication-overuse headache. The primary efficacy measure was the number of headache days per month, while secondary efficacy measures were the number of headache attacks per week, headache index, treatment response rate, and migraine disability assessment. The meta-analysis was performed using R 3.5.1. to obtain pooled mean difference and pooled relative risk with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data and dichotomous data, respectively. RESULTS: From 12,773 identified articles, 27 randomized clinical trials were identified. Primary outcome showed significant superiority of psychological treatments (pooled mean difference = − 0.70, 95% CI [− 1.22, − 0.18]). For the secondary outcomes, the number of headache attacks (pooled mean difference = − 1.15, 95% CI [− 1.63, − 0.67]), the headache index (pooled mean difference = − 0.92, 95% CI [− 1.40 to − 0.44]) and the treatment response rate (pooled relative risk = 3.13, 95% CI [2.24, 4.37]) demonstrated significant improvements in the psychological treatment group over the control group. CONCLUSION: Psychological treatments for primary headache disorder reduced headache frequency and the headache index. Future research using standardized outcome measures and strategies for reducing bias is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s10194-019-0965-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Milan 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6734438/ /pubmed/30764752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0965-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Hye Jeong
Lee, Jin Hyeok
Cho, Eun Young
Kim, Sun Mi
Yoon, Seoyoung
Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30764752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0965-4
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyejeong efficacyofpsychologicaltreatmentforheadachedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leejinhyeok efficacyofpsychologicaltreatmentforheadachedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT choeunyoung efficacyofpsychologicaltreatmentforheadachedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimsunmi efficacyofpsychologicaltreatmentforheadachedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoonseoyoung efficacyofpsychologicaltreatmentforheadachedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis