Cargando…

Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the findings of clinical electrophysiology studies aimed to investigate changes in information processing of migraine with aura patients. MAIN BODY: Abnormalities in alpha rhythm power and symmetry, the presence of slow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coppola, Gianluca, Di Lorenzo, Cherubino, Parisi, Vincenzo, Lisicki, Marco, Serrao, Mariano, Pierelli, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0997-9
_version_ 1783450166440755200
author Coppola, Gianluca
Di Lorenzo, Cherubino
Parisi, Vincenzo
Lisicki, Marco
Serrao, Mariano
Pierelli, Francesco
author_facet Coppola, Gianluca
Di Lorenzo, Cherubino
Parisi, Vincenzo
Lisicki, Marco
Serrao, Mariano
Pierelli, Francesco
author_sort Coppola, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the findings of clinical electrophysiology studies aimed to investigate changes in information processing of migraine with aura patients. MAIN BODY: Abnormalities in alpha rhythm power and symmetry, the presence of slowing, and increased information flow in a wide range of frequency bands often characterize the spontaneous EEG activity of MA. Higher grand-average cortical response amplitudes, an increased interhemispheric response asymmetry, and lack of amplitude habituation were less consistently demonstrated in response to any kind of sensory stimulation in MA patients. Studies with single-pulse and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have reported abnormal cortical responsivity manifesting as greater motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, lower threshold for phosphenes production, and paradoxical effects in response to both depressing or enhancing repetitive TMS methodologies. Studies of the trigeminal system in MA are sparse and the few available showed lack of blink reflex habituation and abnormal findings on SFEMG reflecting subclinical, probably inherited, dysfunctions of neuromuscular transmission. The limited studies that were able to investigate patients during the aura revealed suppression of evoked potentials, desynchronization in extrastriate areas and in the temporal lobe, and large variations in direct current potentials with magnetoelectroencephalography. Contrary to what has been observed in the most common forms of migraine, patients with familial hemiplegic migraine show greater habituation in response to visual and trigeminal stimuli, as well as a higher motor threshold and a lower MEP amplitude than healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Since most of the electrophysiological abnormalities mentioned above were more frequently present and had a greater amplitude in migraine with aura than in migraine without aura, neurophysiological techniques have been shown to be of great help in the search for the pathophysiological basis of migraine aura.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6734510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67345102019-09-12 Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura Coppola, Gianluca Di Lorenzo, Cherubino Parisi, Vincenzo Lisicki, Marco Serrao, Mariano Pierelli, Francesco J Headache Pain Review Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the findings of clinical electrophysiology studies aimed to investigate changes in information processing of migraine with aura patients. MAIN BODY: Abnormalities in alpha rhythm power and symmetry, the presence of slowing, and increased information flow in a wide range of frequency bands often characterize the spontaneous EEG activity of MA. Higher grand-average cortical response amplitudes, an increased interhemispheric response asymmetry, and lack of amplitude habituation were less consistently demonstrated in response to any kind of sensory stimulation in MA patients. Studies with single-pulse and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have reported abnormal cortical responsivity manifesting as greater motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, lower threshold for phosphenes production, and paradoxical effects in response to both depressing or enhancing repetitive TMS methodologies. Studies of the trigeminal system in MA are sparse and the few available showed lack of blink reflex habituation and abnormal findings on SFEMG reflecting subclinical, probably inherited, dysfunctions of neuromuscular transmission. The limited studies that were able to investigate patients during the aura revealed suppression of evoked potentials, desynchronization in extrastriate areas and in the temporal lobe, and large variations in direct current potentials with magnetoelectroencephalography. Contrary to what has been observed in the most common forms of migraine, patients with familial hemiplegic migraine show greater habituation in response to visual and trigeminal stimuli, as well as a higher motor threshold and a lower MEP amplitude than healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Since most of the electrophysiological abnormalities mentioned above were more frequently present and had a greater amplitude in migraine with aura than in migraine without aura, neurophysiological techniques have been shown to be of great help in the search for the pathophysiological basis of migraine aura. Springer Milan 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6734510/ /pubmed/31035929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0997-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Coppola, Gianluca
Di Lorenzo, Cherubino
Parisi, Vincenzo
Lisicki, Marco
Serrao, Mariano
Pierelli, Francesco
Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura
title Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura
title_full Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura
title_fullStr Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura
title_full_unstemmed Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura
title_short Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura
title_sort clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6734510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0997-9
work_keys_str_mv AT coppolagianluca clinicalneurophysiologyofmigrainewithaura
AT dilorenzocherubino clinicalneurophysiologyofmigrainewithaura
AT parisivincenzo clinicalneurophysiologyofmigrainewithaura
AT lisickimarco clinicalneurophysiologyofmigrainewithaura
AT serraomariano clinicalneurophysiologyofmigrainewithaura
AT pierellifrancesco clinicalneurophysiologyofmigrainewithaura