Cargando…

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of residual myopia and astigmatism following femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty (FLEK). DESIGN: Retrospective case review. METHODS: Chart review of all patients with pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Elizabeth, Tsai, Lester, Muniz Castro, Hannah, Wade, Matthew, Farid, Marjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6735192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31559093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8520183
_version_ 1783450308109664256
author Shen, Elizabeth
Tsai, Lester
Muniz Castro, Hannah
Wade, Matthew
Farid, Marjan
author_facet Shen, Elizabeth
Tsai, Lester
Muniz Castro, Hannah
Wade, Matthew
Farid, Marjan
author_sort Shen, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of residual myopia and astigmatism following femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty (FLEK). DESIGN: Retrospective case review. METHODS: Chart review of all patients with prior FLEK who subsequently underwent femto-LASIK surgery after full suture removal was performed at the Gavin Herbert Eye Institute at the University of California, Irvine. A total of 14 eyes in 13 patients met this criterion, and their comprehensive examinations performed at standard intervals were reviewed. Main outcome measures include uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), manifest refractive astigmatism, and spherical equivalent. RESULTS: From the preoperative visit to the 3 month visit, all 14 eyes significantly improved in UDVA (logMAR, 0.93 ± 0.23 to 0.44 ± 0.32, P = 0.002) with no loss of CDVA (logMAR, 0.26 ± 0.19 to 0.18 ± 0.23, P = 0.50). All 14 eyes showed significant improvement in manifest refractive astigmatism (4.71 ± 1.77 to 2.18 ± 1.45 diopters (D), P = 0.003) and spherical equivalent (−2.57 ± 2.45 to −0.48 ± 0.83 D, P = 0.0007). There were no flap or graft complications as a result of femto-LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that femto-LASIK on eyes with prior FLEK is safe and effective in improving visual acuity and reducing residual astigmatism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6735192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67351922019-09-26 Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty Shen, Elizabeth Tsai, Lester Muniz Castro, Hannah Wade, Matthew Farid, Marjan J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of residual myopia and astigmatism following femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty (FLEK). DESIGN: Retrospective case review. METHODS: Chart review of all patients with prior FLEK who subsequently underwent femto-LASIK surgery after full suture removal was performed at the Gavin Herbert Eye Institute at the University of California, Irvine. A total of 14 eyes in 13 patients met this criterion, and their comprehensive examinations performed at standard intervals were reviewed. Main outcome measures include uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), manifest refractive astigmatism, and spherical equivalent. RESULTS: From the preoperative visit to the 3 month visit, all 14 eyes significantly improved in UDVA (logMAR, 0.93 ± 0.23 to 0.44 ± 0.32, P = 0.002) with no loss of CDVA (logMAR, 0.26 ± 0.19 to 0.18 ± 0.23, P = 0.50). All 14 eyes showed significant improvement in manifest refractive astigmatism (4.71 ± 1.77 to 2.18 ± 1.45 diopters (D), P = 0.003) and spherical equivalent (−2.57 ± 2.45 to −0.48 ± 0.83 D, P = 0.0007). There were no flap or graft complications as a result of femto-LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that femto-LASIK on eyes with prior FLEK is safe and effective in improving visual acuity and reducing residual astigmatism. Hindawi 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6735192/ /pubmed/31559093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8520183 Text en Copyright © 2019 Elizabeth Shen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shen, Elizabeth
Tsai, Lester
Muniz Castro, Hannah
Wade, Matthew
Farid, Marjan
Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty
title Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty
title_full Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty
title_fullStr Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty
title_short Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty
title_sort femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis treatment of residual refractive error following femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6735192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31559093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8520183
work_keys_str_mv AT shenelizabeth femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusistreatmentofresidualrefractiveerrorfollowingfemtosecondlaserenabledkeratoplasty
AT tsailester femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusistreatmentofresidualrefractiveerrorfollowingfemtosecondlaserenabledkeratoplasty
AT munizcastrohannah femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusistreatmentofresidualrefractiveerrorfollowingfemtosecondlaserenabledkeratoplasty
AT wadematthew femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusistreatmentofresidualrefractiveerrorfollowingfemtosecondlaserenabledkeratoplasty
AT faridmarjan femtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusistreatmentofresidualrefractiveerrorfollowingfemtosecondlaserenabledkeratoplasty