Cargando…

Centralized Communication of Blood Culture Results Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if integrating antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) personnel with rapid diagnostic testing resulted in improved outcomes for patients with positive blood cultures. METHOD: Beginning in 2016, Saint Luke’s Health System (SLHS) implemented a new process wher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shemanski, Shelby, Bennett, Nicholas, Essmyer, Cynthia, Kennedy, Kevin, Buchanan, Donna M, Warnes, Andrew, Boyd, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz321
_version_ 1783450452424130560
author Shemanski, Shelby
Bennett, Nicholas
Essmyer, Cynthia
Kennedy, Kevin
Buchanan, Donna M
Warnes, Andrew
Boyd, Sarah
author_facet Shemanski, Shelby
Bennett, Nicholas
Essmyer, Cynthia
Kennedy, Kevin
Buchanan, Donna M
Warnes, Andrew
Boyd, Sarah
author_sort Shemanski, Shelby
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if integrating antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) personnel with rapid diagnostic testing resulted in improved outcomes for patients with positive blood cultures. METHOD: Beginning in 2016, Saint Luke’s Health System (SLHS) implemented a new process where all positive blood cultures were communicated to ASP personnel or SLHS pharmacy staff. Pharmacists then became responsible for interpreting results, assessing patient specific information, and subsequently relaying culture and treatment information to providers. This was a multisite, pre-post, quasi-experimental study (Pre: August to December 2014; Post: August to December 2016). Patients 18 years of age and older with a positive blood culture during admission were included (2014, n = 218; 2016, n = 286). Coprimary outcomes of time to optimal and appropriate therapy were determined from time of culture positivity via gram stain. Secondary outcomes focused on clinical, process, and fiscal endpoints. A pre-post intervention physician survey was conducted to assess the impact on antimicrobial decision making and perceived effect on patient outcomes. RESULTS: There was no difference in time to appropriate therapy groups (P = .079). Time to optimal therapy was 9.2 hours shorter in 2016 (P = .004). Provider surveys indicated the process improved communication among clinicians and facilitated a shared decision-making process with a perceived improvement in patient care. CONCLUSIONS: An ASP-led blood culture communication process for patients with positive blood cultures was shown to improve time to optimal therapy, support physicians in their decision making on critical lab data, and improve the care for hospitalized patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6736069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67360692019-09-16 Centralized Communication of Blood Culture Results Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics Shemanski, Shelby Bennett, Nicholas Essmyer, Cynthia Kennedy, Kevin Buchanan, Donna M Warnes, Andrew Boyd, Sarah Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if integrating antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) personnel with rapid diagnostic testing resulted in improved outcomes for patients with positive blood cultures. METHOD: Beginning in 2016, Saint Luke’s Health System (SLHS) implemented a new process where all positive blood cultures were communicated to ASP personnel or SLHS pharmacy staff. Pharmacists then became responsible for interpreting results, assessing patient specific information, and subsequently relaying culture and treatment information to providers. This was a multisite, pre-post, quasi-experimental study (Pre: August to December 2014; Post: August to December 2016). Patients 18 years of age and older with a positive blood culture during admission were included (2014, n = 218; 2016, n = 286). Coprimary outcomes of time to optimal and appropriate therapy were determined from time of culture positivity via gram stain. Secondary outcomes focused on clinical, process, and fiscal endpoints. A pre-post intervention physician survey was conducted to assess the impact on antimicrobial decision making and perceived effect on patient outcomes. RESULTS: There was no difference in time to appropriate therapy groups (P = .079). Time to optimal therapy was 9.2 hours shorter in 2016 (P = .004). Provider surveys indicated the process improved communication among clinicians and facilitated a shared decision-making process with a perceived improvement in patient care. CONCLUSIONS: An ASP-led blood culture communication process for patients with positive blood cultures was shown to improve time to optimal therapy, support physicians in their decision making on critical lab data, and improve the care for hospitalized patients. Oxford University Press 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6736069/ /pubmed/31660401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz321 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Major Article
Shemanski, Shelby
Bennett, Nicholas
Essmyer, Cynthia
Kennedy, Kevin
Buchanan, Donna M
Warnes, Andrew
Boyd, Sarah
Centralized Communication of Blood Culture Results Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics
title Centralized Communication of Blood Culture Results Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics
title_full Centralized Communication of Blood Culture Results Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics
title_fullStr Centralized Communication of Blood Culture Results Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Centralized Communication of Blood Culture Results Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics
title_short Centralized Communication of Blood Culture Results Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics
title_sort centralized communication of blood culture results leveraging antimicrobial stewardship and rapid diagnostics
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz321
work_keys_str_mv AT shemanskishelby centralizedcommunicationofbloodcultureresultsleveragingantimicrobialstewardshipandrapiddiagnostics
AT bennettnicholas centralizedcommunicationofbloodcultureresultsleveragingantimicrobialstewardshipandrapiddiagnostics
AT essmyercynthia centralizedcommunicationofbloodcultureresultsleveragingantimicrobialstewardshipandrapiddiagnostics
AT kennedykevin centralizedcommunicationofbloodcultureresultsleveragingantimicrobialstewardshipandrapiddiagnostics
AT buchanandonnam centralizedcommunicationofbloodcultureresultsleveragingantimicrobialstewardshipandrapiddiagnostics
AT warnesandrew centralizedcommunicationofbloodcultureresultsleveragingantimicrobialstewardshipandrapiddiagnostics
AT boydsarah centralizedcommunicationofbloodcultureresultsleveragingantimicrobialstewardshipandrapiddiagnostics