Cargando…

Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence in the last decade has pointed to the effectiveness of oncolytic virus in the treatment of a variety of cancer types in preclinical or clinical studies, showing high potency and low toxicity compared to conventional treatments. To track this research trend and highl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Yidi, Luo, Yong, Zhang, Jun, Xia, Ningshao, Tan, Guowei, Huang, Chenghao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016817
_version_ 1783450462793498624
author Zou, Yidi
Luo, Yong
Zhang, Jun
Xia, Ningshao
Tan, Guowei
Huang, Chenghao
author_facet Zou, Yidi
Luo, Yong
Zhang, Jun
Xia, Ningshao
Tan, Guowei
Huang, Chenghao
author_sort Zou, Yidi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence in the last decade has pointed to the effectiveness of oncolytic virus in the treatment of a variety of cancer types in preclinical or clinical studies, showing high potency and low toxicity compared to conventional treatments. To track this research trend and highlight future directions, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research to date. METHODS: Relevant studies were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection between January 2000 and December 2018. Data were collected in terms of the number of publications, country, journal of publication, journal scope, author, and keywords or topics. Analysis and visual representation of the data were performed with CiteSpace V. RESULTS: The trend in publications related to oncolytic virus showed a dramatic increase, from 10 publications in 2000 to 199 publications in 2018. The United States clearly dominates this field (981 publications, 52.770%), followed by Canada (244, 13.125%) and China (205, 11.027%). The top 15 academic journals account for over one third of the total publications on oncolytic virus research (724, 38.95%). Most of the related papers were published in journals with a focus on biology, medicine, immunology, medicine, molecular biology, and clinical perspectives, as represented by the dual-map overlay. The most highly cited papers were published in journals in the fields of nursing, molecular biology, general biology, genetics, health, and medicine. Over 1300 institutions have focused their attention on oncolytic virus research to date, and cooperation among mainstream institutions is common. CONCLUSION: The global field of oncolytic virus research has expanded at a rapid pace from 2000 to 2018. There is no doubt that North America currently has the most powerful impact on the field with respect to both productivity and contribution. However, European and some East Asian institutions are also prominent in this field. Overall, this bibliometric study identifies the top 4 hotspots in oncolytic virus research: T-cells, vaccinia virus, dendritic cells, and apoptosis. Thus, further research focuses on these topics may be more helpful to promote the clinical translation of this treatment strategy to bring a benefit to cancer patients in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6736135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67361352019-10-02 Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018 Zou, Yidi Luo, Yong Zhang, Jun Xia, Ningshao Tan, Guowei Huang, Chenghao Medicine (Baltimore) 3700 BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence in the last decade has pointed to the effectiveness of oncolytic virus in the treatment of a variety of cancer types in preclinical or clinical studies, showing high potency and low toxicity compared to conventional treatments. To track this research trend and highlight future directions, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research to date. METHODS: Relevant studies were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection between January 2000 and December 2018. Data were collected in terms of the number of publications, country, journal of publication, journal scope, author, and keywords or topics. Analysis and visual representation of the data were performed with CiteSpace V. RESULTS: The trend in publications related to oncolytic virus showed a dramatic increase, from 10 publications in 2000 to 199 publications in 2018. The United States clearly dominates this field (981 publications, 52.770%), followed by Canada (244, 13.125%) and China (205, 11.027%). The top 15 academic journals account for over one third of the total publications on oncolytic virus research (724, 38.95%). Most of the related papers were published in journals with a focus on biology, medicine, immunology, medicine, molecular biology, and clinical perspectives, as represented by the dual-map overlay. The most highly cited papers were published in journals in the fields of nursing, molecular biology, general biology, genetics, health, and medicine. Over 1300 institutions have focused their attention on oncolytic virus research to date, and cooperation among mainstream institutions is common. CONCLUSION: The global field of oncolytic virus research has expanded at a rapid pace from 2000 to 2018. There is no doubt that North America currently has the most powerful impact on the field with respect to both productivity and contribution. However, European and some East Asian institutions are also prominent in this field. Overall, this bibliometric study identifies the top 4 hotspots in oncolytic virus research: T-cells, vaccinia virus, dendritic cells, and apoptosis. Thus, further research focuses on these topics may be more helpful to promote the clinical translation of this treatment strategy to bring a benefit to cancer patients in the near future. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6736135/ /pubmed/31464907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016817 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3700
Zou, Yidi
Luo, Yong
Zhang, Jun
Xia, Ningshao
Tan, Guowei
Huang, Chenghao
Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018
title Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018
title_full Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018
title_fullStr Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018
title_short Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018
title_sort bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018
topic 3700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016817
work_keys_str_mv AT zouyidi bibliometricanalysisofoncolyticvirusresearch2000to2018
AT luoyong bibliometricanalysisofoncolyticvirusresearch2000to2018
AT zhangjun bibliometricanalysisofoncolyticvirusresearch2000to2018
AT xianingshao bibliometricanalysisofoncolyticvirusresearch2000to2018
AT tanguowei bibliometricanalysisofoncolyticvirusresearch2000to2018
AT huangchenghao bibliometricanalysisofoncolyticvirusresearch2000to2018