Cargando…

Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study

The composition of the small intestinal microbiota has not yet been characterized thoroughly using culture-independent techniques. We compared small intestinal microbial communities in patients with and without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) using culture-dependent and culture-independ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Andrea S., Gao, Xiang, Bohm, Matthew, Lin, Huaiying, Gupta, Anita, Nelson, David E., Toh, Evelyn, Teagarden, Sean, Siwiec, Robert, Dong, Qunfeng, Wo, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464691
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000073
_version_ 1783450474236608512
author Shin, Andrea S.
Gao, Xiang
Bohm, Matthew
Lin, Huaiying
Gupta, Anita
Nelson, David E.
Toh, Evelyn
Teagarden, Sean
Siwiec, Robert
Dong, Qunfeng
Wo, John M.
author_facet Shin, Andrea S.
Gao, Xiang
Bohm, Matthew
Lin, Huaiying
Gupta, Anita
Nelson, David E.
Toh, Evelyn
Teagarden, Sean
Siwiec, Robert
Dong, Qunfeng
Wo, John M.
author_sort Shin, Andrea S.
collection PubMed
description The composition of the small intestinal microbiota has not yet been characterized thoroughly using culture-independent techniques. We compared small intestinal microbial communities in patients with and without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) using culture-dependent and culture-independent bacterial identification approaches. METHODS: Small bowel aspirate and mucosal samples were collected from patients with suspected SIBO. The aspirates were cultured to diagnose SIBO, defined as ≥10(4) colony-forming units/mL coliform or ≥10(5) colony-forming units/mL upper aerodigestive tract bacteria. Bacteria in the aspirates and mucosa were identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We compared small intestinal microbiome composition between groups with and without a culture-based SIBO diagnosis. RESULTS: Analysis of the aspirate and mucosal microbial communities from 36 patients revealed decreased α-diversity but no differences in β-diversity in patients with SIBO compared with those without SIBO. There were no significant differences in the relative abundance of individual taxa from the aspirates or mucosa after adjustment for false discovery rate between patients with and without SIBO. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in mucosal β-diversity between the coliform and upper aerodigestive tract subgroups. Relative abundances of a mucosal Clostridium spp. (P = 0.05) and an aspirate Granulicatella spp. (P = 0.02) were higher in coliform SIBO vs non-SIBO subgroups. The microbial composition and relative abundance of multiple taxa significantly differed in the mucosal and aspirate specimens. DISCUSSION: Culture-based results of small bowel aspirates do not correspond to aspirate microbiota composition but may be associated with species richness of the mucosal microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6736222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67362222019-10-10 Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study Shin, Andrea S. Gao, Xiang Bohm, Matthew Lin, Huaiying Gupta, Anita Nelson, David E. Toh, Evelyn Teagarden, Sean Siwiec, Robert Dong, Qunfeng Wo, John M. Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article The composition of the small intestinal microbiota has not yet been characterized thoroughly using culture-independent techniques. We compared small intestinal microbial communities in patients with and without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) using culture-dependent and culture-independent bacterial identification approaches. METHODS: Small bowel aspirate and mucosal samples were collected from patients with suspected SIBO. The aspirates were cultured to diagnose SIBO, defined as ≥10(4) colony-forming units/mL coliform or ≥10(5) colony-forming units/mL upper aerodigestive tract bacteria. Bacteria in the aspirates and mucosa were identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We compared small intestinal microbiome composition between groups with and without a culture-based SIBO diagnosis. RESULTS: Analysis of the aspirate and mucosal microbial communities from 36 patients revealed decreased α-diversity but no differences in β-diversity in patients with SIBO compared with those without SIBO. There were no significant differences in the relative abundance of individual taxa from the aspirates or mucosa after adjustment for false discovery rate between patients with and without SIBO. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in mucosal β-diversity between the coliform and upper aerodigestive tract subgroups. Relative abundances of a mucosal Clostridium spp. (P = 0.05) and an aspirate Granulicatella spp. (P = 0.02) were higher in coliform SIBO vs non-SIBO subgroups. The microbial composition and relative abundance of multiple taxa significantly differed in the mucosal and aspirate specimens. DISCUSSION: Culture-based results of small bowel aspirates do not correspond to aspirate microbiota composition but may be associated with species richness of the mucosal microbiota. Wolters Kluwer 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6736222/ /pubmed/31464691 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000073 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Andrea S.
Gao, Xiang
Bohm, Matthew
Lin, Huaiying
Gupta, Anita
Nelson, David E.
Toh, Evelyn
Teagarden, Sean
Siwiec, Robert
Dong, Qunfeng
Wo, John M.
Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Characterization of Proximal Small Intestinal Microbiota in Patients With Suspected Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort characterization of proximal small intestinal microbiota in patients with suspected small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464691
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000073
work_keys_str_mv AT shinandreas characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT gaoxiang characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT bohmmatthew characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT linhuaiying characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT guptaanita characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT nelsondavide characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT tohevelyn characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT teagardensean characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT siwiecrobert characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT dongqunfeng characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy
AT wojohnm characterizationofproximalsmallintestinalmicrobiotainpatientswithsuspectedsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthacrosssectionalstudy