Cargando…

A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: ASP8273, a novel, small molecule, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) specifically inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with activating mutations or EGFR T790M resistance mutations. The current study examines the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, R J, Shepherd, F A, Krivoshik, A, Jie, F, Horn, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31070709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz128
_version_ 1783450496031260672
author Kelly, R J
Shepherd, F A
Krivoshik, A
Jie, F
Horn, L
author_facet Kelly, R J
Shepherd, F A
Krivoshik, A
Jie, F
Horn, L
author_sort Kelly, R J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ASP8273, a novel, small molecule, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) specifically inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with activating mutations or EGFR T790M resistance mutations. The current study examines the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations not previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This global, phase III, open-label, randomized study evaluated ASP8273 versus erlotinib/gefitinib in patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or unresectable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. They were ineligible if they received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points included overall survival, investigator-assessed PFS, best overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, duration of response (DoR), and the safety/tolerability profile. RESULTS: Patients (n = 530) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive ASP8273 (n = 267) or erlotinib/gefitinib (n = 263). Patient demographics between both treatment groups were generally balanced. Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.6–11.1 months) for patients receiving ASP8273 and 9.6 months (95% CI 8.8–NE) for the erlotinib/gefitinib group, with a hazard ratio of 1.611 (P = 0.992). The ORR in the ASP8273 group was 33% (95% CI 27.4–39.0) versus 47.9% (95% CI 41.7–54.1) in the erlotinib/gefitinib group. Median DoR was similar for both groups (9.2 months for ASP8273 versus 9.0 months for erlotinib/gefitinib). More grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in patients receiving ASP8273 than in those receiving erlotinib/gefitinib (54.7% versus 43.5%). An independent data monitoring committee carried out an interim safety analysis and recommended discontinuing the study due to toxicity and limited predicted efficacy of ASP8273 relative to erlotinib/gefitinib. CONCLUSIONS: First-line ASP8273 did not show improved PFS or equivalent toxicities versus erlotinib/gefitinib. CLINICALTRIAL.GOV NUMBER: NCT02588261.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6736319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67363192019-09-16 A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer Kelly, R J Shepherd, F A Krivoshik, A Jie, F Horn, L Ann Oncol Original Articles BACKGROUND: ASP8273, a novel, small molecule, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) specifically inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with activating mutations or EGFR T790M resistance mutations. The current study examines the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations not previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This global, phase III, open-label, randomized study evaluated ASP8273 versus erlotinib/gefitinib in patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or unresectable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. They were ineligible if they received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points included overall survival, investigator-assessed PFS, best overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, duration of response (DoR), and the safety/tolerability profile. RESULTS: Patients (n = 530) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive ASP8273 (n = 267) or erlotinib/gefitinib (n = 263). Patient demographics between both treatment groups were generally balanced. Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.6–11.1 months) for patients receiving ASP8273 and 9.6 months (95% CI 8.8–NE) for the erlotinib/gefitinib group, with a hazard ratio of 1.611 (P = 0.992). The ORR in the ASP8273 group was 33% (95% CI 27.4–39.0) versus 47.9% (95% CI 41.7–54.1) in the erlotinib/gefitinib group. Median DoR was similar for both groups (9.2 months for ASP8273 versus 9.0 months for erlotinib/gefitinib). More grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in patients receiving ASP8273 than in those receiving erlotinib/gefitinib (54.7% versus 43.5%). An independent data monitoring committee carried out an interim safety analysis and recommended discontinuing the study due to toxicity and limited predicted efficacy of ASP8273 relative to erlotinib/gefitinib. CONCLUSIONS: First-line ASP8273 did not show improved PFS or equivalent toxicities versus erlotinib/gefitinib. CLINICALTRIAL.GOV NUMBER: NCT02588261. Oxford University Press 2019-07 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6736319/ /pubmed/31070709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz128 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kelly, R J
Shepherd, F A
Krivoshik, A
Jie, F
Horn, L
A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_short A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer
title_sort phase iii, randomized, open-label study of asp8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage iiib/iv non-small-cell lung cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6736319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31070709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz128
work_keys_str_mv AT kellyrj aphaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT shepherdfa aphaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT krivoshika aphaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT jief aphaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hornl aphaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kellyrj phaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT shepherdfa phaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT krivoshika phaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT jief phaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hornl phaseiiirandomizedopenlabelstudyofasp8273versuserlotiniborgefitinibinpatientswithadvancedstageiiibivnonsmallcelllungcancer